Hi,
I was out of town and late to this party. As a guy who has been to many tea parties, supported conservative candidates over the years etc. let me chime in.
Forget the damn labels for a minute and look at facts.
I am opposed to something for nothing, you work, you eat. You choose not to work, you go hungry. That is the way it is in most countries in the world.
I am not dispassionate, those who truly cannot work, birth defects, and/or other things should be provided for. If we stopped subsidizing the lazy we would have plenty to go around for the needy.
All men are created equal, and have a right to PURSUE LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. The government nor any society in the world guarantees equal results. You do not penalize success in the name of "fairness" and confiscate what they achieved to give to those who choose to live off the government as a lifestyle of choice.
When Hoover and Roosevelt were sparring over what government's role should be during the great depression, Hoover wanted to subsidize businesses to create jobs so people could work and get back on their feet. Roosevelt started unemployment and wanted to give the money directly to the people.
As it said in my daughter's history book, and I quote Mr. Hoover....."The minute you allow the public direct access to the treasury you will create chaos beyone anything mankind has ever known."
Would seem to me that Hoover was correct. Once politicians on both sides of the aisle realized they could spend our hard earned tax dollars to buy votes they turned it into an art form. Now we subsidize and incentivize out of wedlock birth so millions of Americans are on the government dole and therefore must continue to vote for those who feed them. We give people in this country illegally money, free health care etc. in hopes of someday giving them amnesty so they too can be democrats and keep the party in power.
The socialists don't give a damn about the people, they find their programs are best suited to maintian their power.
A conservative looks at success as how many people they can get off the government dole, into the work force, bettering their life and the lives of their family. Conservatives believe it is the parents and the family that know best, as do the local governments and the role of the federal government should be as intended in the constitution, to provide for the common defense and regulate trade. The rest should be left to the states.
A socialist looks at success as how they can steal from producers, give more to those on the dole so they can maintain their power. They more they can consolidate power federally and take it away from the states and the people the more they insure their power for generations. Why does Mexico suck? Might start with the fact the ruling party has ruled for 100 years. Look at the US cities where the democrats have ruled for close to 100 years, looks like abject failure to me.
5412