Brennan admits Obama allows targeted assassination of Americans

[DumbAss Tanker]

CM, Javelin & Co. are mainly Ron Paul Libertarian types, who are heavily isolationist and want to pretend the US has no real business conducting military operations overseas without a formal declaration of war against another nation-state, but otherwise should pull everything back into the States.  Within the US, they do sort of believe in the Constitution, but they are just the opposite side of the same coin the Dems represent - they mean the Constitution as THEY interpret it, not what 220-odd years of law, scholarship, and Supreme Court rulings have said it means.

The '100 percenters' are not necessarily the same bunch, though there's certainly overlap.  Still, there are other members active here who are basically 100 percenters, without being Paultards.  It means they are against anyone who isn't absolutely 100 percent square with their own views, and wouldn't support a GOP candidate (For example) who had five out of seven important positions in common with them against a Democrat who had zero in common and stood for their total destruction to boot (Note to other readers, I'm not talking about anyone in particular here, but if the shoe fits, wear it).   

[ConservativeMobster]

Thanks DAT! 

[TheSarge]

CM, Javelin & Co. are mainly Ron Paul Libertarian types, who are heavily isolationist and want to pretend the US has no real business conducting military operations overseas without a formal declaration of war against another nation-state, but otherwise should pull everything back into the States.  Within the US, they do sort of believe in the Constitution, but they are just the opposite side of the same coin the Dems represent - they mean the Constitution as THEY interpret it, not what 220-odd years of law, scholarship, and Supreme Court rulings have said it means.

The '100 percenters' are not necessarily the same bunch, though there's certainly overlap.  Still, there are other members active here who are basically 100 percenters, without being Paultards.  It means they are against anyone who isn't absolutely 100 percent square with their own views, and wouldn't support a GOP candidate (For example) who had five out of seven important positions in common with them against a Democrat who had zero in common and stood for their total destruction to boot (Note to other readers, I'm not talking about anyone in particular here, but if the shoe fits, wear it).  

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

This was the most confusing thread I've read here, thus far.  Not you MSB or DAT....are these nutjobs Javelin et al for tyranny or what?  No, that would exclude quoting the Constitution, so they are Reaganites?  NO, he's spinning about now....

And most importantly, what is a 100 %er?

They believe that if the gov't targets US citizens bearing arms against the US that somehow that will bode ill for anyone daring to criticize the government.

It basically descends from an over-inflated sense of self, as if they are somehow important enough to merit government scrutiny and they are more vigilant then the average American. The 100-percenters (because it's 100% their agenda or the entire nation is too corrupt to be allowed to endure with these cats) will point to examples such as DHS's report looking at people who oppose abortion or assert the primacy of the 10th Amendment as a reason to fear for their lives. What they obviously miss is the fact that there was a media to expose the report in the first place and good Americans inside DHS willing to spill the beans by leaking the report.

The notion that anyone bearing arms in an act of war is entitled to civil judicial proceedings is unheard of except in modern America only by those who dream of leading a 2nd American Revolution or Civil War...ironically, that engenders them killing thousands of Americans without due process by acts of war as the prime method of their effort to protect us from those who would kill people engaged in acts of war without due process.