PG, a death threat is just plain stupid. There's no other way to put it. I understand the outrage - indeed, I feel it myself.
But to resort to penny-ante vandalism (which it certainly is not -- glass is expensive these days) is foolish -- who's going to pay for the damage done to Slaughter's office? Slaughter herself? No sir, you and I are going to pay for that via our taxes and our support of Slaughter and the rest of her cronies.
Feeling the outrage and the pain does not in any way warrant and justify breaking the law to express that outrage, no matter how Patrick Henry-ish it may seem.
It looks to me like most of the Tea Partiers got a very visceral reaction out of the lib government and the MSM and they did it by peaceful demonstrations and voices raised in protest.
Noise doesn't communicate a threat -- bricks and weapons do.
We're a long way from revolution on this because the backlash is just starting. I implore you to give it some time and be patient. Let the system work.
November is not that far off. Apart from our voices, the only viable weapon we should be brandishing at this point is our vote.
Remember this my dearest friend: The "MAIN" reason for the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, is to guard American citizens against tyranny. In very simple terms, in some cases, guarding against tyranny is putting a bullet in the head of government tools when they become dictators and fail to follow the Constitution and violate our God Ordained rights as enumerated by the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution.
Additionally, the Bill of Rights is NOT a document stating the rights given us citizens by the federal government. Rather, the Bill of Rights is a Constitutional document DICTATING how the federal government SHALL *NOT* infirnge upon those rights as endowed upon us citizens/individuals by our creator.
As much as *I* would like to believe, the Second Amendment is not just for hunting and protection from criminals, it is for protection against tyranny. That is where the death threats come in.
"**** with my guaranteed God given Constitutional rights and there is a good chance that you will become an end-user of my Second Amendment rights per se."
The mother-****ers, regardless of how the "Main Stream Media" labels label them, need to know that there are elements in this nation that fully believe in and will act upon every resource available to them to ensure power hunger leftists will not infringe upon their freedoms. If that means making sure they know that their UNCONSTITUTIONAL actions will result in potentially DEATHLY consequences, so be it. Besides, they ****tards do NOT have compromise in their mindset so it is either one extreme or the other" Lose freedoms when enacting their laws or lose their existence because of it.
Which is more important to you by the way?
Listen my friend, a few hundred dollars, in fact a few hundred million is zero compared to the cost of the freedoms we have lost here.
Can you reconcile those costs in a government or IRS budget?
I cannot. Already 0bama and his little Eichmann supporter's have plunged this nation into $10+ TRILLION in debt with the Fannie/Freddie and the bailouts and because of this, hyper inflation is on the horizon.
As far as "breaking the law" goes, 0bama and "dead-eye with the Thousand-Mile-Stare, Botox-Frozen, Medusa-Faced" Pelosi have already done so. I know, bad behavior on ones part does NOT justify bad behavior on another's part and I agree with you on this but I am seriously afraid we are moving to a "no other choice" situation here.
November looms on the horizon. Change is warranted and demanded, or else....
I guess my rant is over for now.
Thank you...
