Author Topic: Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act  (Read 1985 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Attero Dominatus

  • VRWC Psionics Corps
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2387
  • Reputation: +164/-11
  • Ipsa Scientia Potestas Est
Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act
« on: January 30, 2008, 05:16:47 PM »
Quote
By Nate Anderson  | Published: January 29, 2008 - 09:57PM CT

Not content with the current (and already massive) statutory damages allowed under copyright law, the RIAA is pushing to expand the provision. The issue is compilations, which now are treated as a single work. In the RIAA's perfect world, each copied track would count as a separate act of infringement, meaning that a copying a ten-song CD even one time could end up costing a defendant $1.5 million if done willfully. Sound fair? Proportional? Necessary? Not really, but that doesn't mean it won't become law.

The change to statutory damages is contained in the PRO-IP Act that is currently up for consideration in Congress. We've reported on the bill before, noting that Google's top copyright lawyer (and the man who wrote a seven-volume treatise on the subject of copyright law), William Patry, called the bill the most "outrageously gluttonous IP bill ever introduced in the US."

The industries pushing it (music, especially) have an "unslakable lust for more and more rights, longer terms of protection, draconian criminal provisions, and civil damages that bear no resemblance to the damages suffered," he said. 

Public Knowledge head Gigi Sohn testified before Congress last year that statutory damages are already "disproportionate penalties for infringement," pointing that it hardly seems fair to bill someone like Jammie Thomas more than $9,000 per song when each track costs a buck. Even accounting for a punitive penalty, that seems absurdly high.

Both Patry and Sohn attended a Copyright Office roundtable on statutory damages a few days ago, and Public Knowledge's staff attorney Sherwin Siy has posted a fascinating writeup of the closed-door session.

The meeting was a small affair, with only 30 or so stakeholders in attendance, and it quickly became clear that even content owners had different takes on the situation. The Magazine Publishers Association, for instance, argued for maintaining the current law. If the PRO-IP Act passes, anyone found guilty of copying a magazine could be liable for hundreds of separate acts of infringement (at the judge's discretion), but magazine accused of copyright violations would face similarly huge penalties.

Treat every person who buys a CD as a potential criminal. <sarcasm>That will boost CD sales </sarcasm> :whatever:

More: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080129-statutory-damages-not-high-enough.html
Those who would trade their liberty for temporary security will get neither. --Benjamin Franklin.

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23532
  • Reputation: +924/-225
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2008, 09:29:33 PM »
Stupid idea.  ::)
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline Atomic Lib Smasher

  • Liberal Hunter
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
  • Reputation: +165/-16
  • Just Say Nobama
Re: Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2008, 09:32:38 PM »
I think the RIAA has done more to screw the music industry in recent years, then even the shitty songs by recycled so called "artists" have.

Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid! - Mark R. Levin

Offline djones520

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Reputation: +181/-146
Re: Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2008, 09:42:25 PM »
I tend to break CD's on a somewhat frequent basis.  So the first thing I do when I buy one is copy the music onto my PC so if I do break it, I can reburn it and still listen to it at work and such.

Companies wanna come after me for that, I'd love to see them try it.
"Chuck Norris once had sex in an 18 wheeler. Some of his semen dripped onto the engine. We now call that truck Optimus Prime."

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11479
  • Reputation: +592/-163
Re: Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2008, 11:56:28 PM »
Great way to keep the millions of music fans going to the stores and buying your artist products. 




Oh wait they aren't buying jack now2 because the RIAA has ripped us off and is now trying to make it so no one will be willing to buy even one copy of "Jan and Deans Greatest Hits" let alone The Beatles "Abby Road" or Fleetwood Macs "Rumors" or Rick Wakemans "White Rock".
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Copy a CD, owe $1.5 million under "gluttonous" PRO-IP Act
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2008, 12:11:34 AM »
Well, since music pretty much sucks these days, this isn't much of an issue.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.