Dear Leftists, screw you and your Muslim sluts
Okay, so Rush Limbaugh popped-off on some slut who apparently can’t pay for her own birth control while attending a college where only the progeny of the 1% can afford the tuition costs. One wonders if Fluke went to a Catholic university for no reason except to agitate for the trampling of Catholic beliefs. It’s like watching David Duke trying to muscle his way into the African American Students Union on the basis of Affirmative Action.
I don’t know why she’s offended by the term slut. I like sluts (even though I don’t like Fluke, her jaw-line is too Brad Pittish). Some of my best friends over the years have been sluts and I look forward to meeting new sluts every day. Some people say slut like it’s a bad thing. I don’t understand this.
If you’re going to be a certain sort of person just be that person and who cares what others think about it. Who cares if your detractors give it a negative connotation? If it makes you feel bad then maybe you shouldn’t do it. In legal circles it’s called, consciousness of guilt. Among the clergy it’s called conviction.
Case in point: I have never once taken offense at being called an asshole.
A slut, near as I can tell, is a term for a woman who will consistently and regularly have sex for the purpose of self-gratification with serial partners without regard to long-term commitment in a relationship.
That’s awesome!
Men have needs too, you know! For every slut there are several men out there being well-serviced. In a world of sexual equality men deserve to have just as much sex as women and if too many women are waiting until marriage then it’s nice to know the Slut Brigade is there to bat clean-up. In the 80’s we moved past the social stigma associated with sloppy seconds; now our sexual relief is being assaulted on a new front.
Obviously stray offspring would only complicate matters so let’s make sure our sluts aren’t getting pregnant. There’s no reason 3 or 4 or more guys all have to wait nervously at the doctor’s office waiting for the DNA test to come back just to find out who is on the hook for the impending abortion/child support. That’s a lot of man-hours wasted which could have been spent on gainful employments and those bar tabs don’t pay for themselves.
And no, I’m not sporting for the cost of condoms. It’s her body so obviously it’s her choice…or so I’m told. If she doesn’t want HER body to become pregnant then SHE can use whatever contraceptive SHE feels appropriate.
What the Left is asking for is for Catholics – and everybody else for that matter – to subsidize their recreational sex. Supposedly to oppose this is to engage in a “war on women,†as termed by the decidedly un-Fluke-able, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D – FL, (813) 555-2546) because recreational sex is an integral part of a woman’s identity that she cannot control or delay. She has to have it NOW!
Just don’t call them sluts.
The Left has decided “slut†like “prostitute†is a bad word, even though it seems far more neutral than “whore.†Now we have the Orwellian euphemism of “sex worker.†Presenting one's vagina for the sole explicit purpose of sexually gratifying men is a time-honored liberal platform. Perhaps if Limbaugh had called Sandra Fluke a, “sex volunteer†they would have nodded approvingly.
Still, it is recreational sex we’re discussing. It is sex akin to playing video games and many a gamer has embraced the term “geek.†Conversely, liberals do not see Catholics as being permitted to have a personal identity. it's almost as if the Liberals consider them unviable tissue. To liberals the Church is less than recreational because it teaches a Catholic man having sex with a Catholic woman will be spiritually and legally bound to her and willing to gladly accept all offspring borne of their union.
Well, we certainly can’t have that! That’s obviously a threat to everything liberals stand/bend-over/kneel/prop-up for.
I’m not going to recite the litany of hypocrisy about Bill Maher, Ed Schultz and the rest of liberal crap-bags they allow to skate for much worse, much more frequently. I won’t even mention that one of their treasured talk show hosts—who can barely speak coherently—incited an anti-Semitic race that cost an innocent man his life.
Nope, I’m not going to mention any of this.
Instead I wish to return your attention to the riots in Afghanistan.
I know you’re probably wondering what non-sequitor this might be but in-between frothing spasms over Mr. Limbaugh’s comments the Left defends mass-murder over a book. Not just any book but a book that is far more misogynist than there mere refusal to subsidize the sexual relief of millions of American men.
The Left will even rail against laws designed to keep sharia from being used as a basis for law and jurisprudence in the US.
So, if I understand the Left correctly, they’re saying Catholics have no right to refrain from paying for contraceptives and abortificients for people who reject Catholic doctrine. Even during Prohibition there was a religious exemption for Communion wine but the Left won’t even concede them an exemption from what Catholics consider to be the taking of human life.
But we must adhere to every cockamamie scheme a bunch of lunatics whose most beloved prophet’s last wife didn’t need contraceptives because – at the tender age of 9 – she hadn’t reached puberty yet.
The Left can find common cause with hordes that take human life because a book was disposed of with the rest of the rubbish and you support US military personnel being punished—OFFICIALLY, ACTUALLY PUNISHED—to assuage a foreign religious law.
And yet they rail when laws are passed to prevent sharia from establishing itself here.
BTW – would sluts feel more inconvenienced by attending Georgetown or a madrassa?
Last month we had Keith Olbermann and Markos Moulitas joking that nobody cared about rapes occurring at the Occupy Wall Street camps around the country. After callously laughing about it they denied it ever occurred. When that failed they then parsed a few, select incidences into triviality; statutory rape, no less (perhaps that explains their comity with the Muhammedans).
During this on-going assault on Leftist women engaged in leftist protest actions in leftist governed shanty-panty towns the Left was silent. Apparently Sandra Fluke is only worth defending because she puts out willingly. To hell with rape victims, they just need to learn to take one for the team…from the team.
Let’s also talk about Rolling Stone writer Matt Tiabbi celebrating the death of Andrew Breitbart whom he calls a “douche.†Never mind the grave-dancing, if we take the Left’s standard that refusing to pay for someone else’s recreational activities is a “war on women†then by calling Breitbart a “douche†then Tiabbi shows an obvious disdain for feminine hygiene. Why does Tiabbi hate women or only love them if they’re scuzzy?
Actually, I lied. Let’s talk about the grave-dancing. If making tasteless statements is all that is required to land a job at Rolling Stone then let me just say Tiabbi will never be on the "caliber" of the other famous Rolling Stone writer, Hunter S. Thompson…unless he too decides to blow his brains out.
We certainly wish him all success but if his marksmanship is anything like his journalistic prowess I have my doubts.
Now, concurrently, we have radio talk show host Mike Malloy mocking people of faith and using the occasion of the tornadoes ravaging the southern US as his impetus. The god these people believe in has supposedly crushed them into “grease spots†with His almighty thumb.
Calling people by a common vernacular term when they proudly boast of engaging in uncommitted sex with an on-going series of partners is bad but the Left is silent about mocking people of faith while their families and lives are shattered. Apparently these country rubes earned their miseries for the sin of believing in God.
Unless they’re Muslims, that is; in which case we want any US service member who upsets them to suffer the weight of sharia. To hell with our constitution or Status Of Forces Agreement that make the US and its Uniform Code of Military Justice the sole governance of US armed forces. Now, suddenly, the Left demands religious sensibilities matter more than law.
Unless the Left is suggesting murderous riots is the only means to gaining their tolerance I’m not sure what message is supposed to be gained here.
Actually, I do.
You liberals are obviously not acting on principle but only political opportunism and for this I take umbrage. You have ruined the once noble cause of sluttery and turned it into a cheap political football.
Damn you! Damn you all!
Edited for major re-write.
