Author Topic: primitives discuss driving in deep snow  (Read 1942 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58679
  • Reputation: +3057/-173
primitives discuss driving in deep snow
« on: March 27, 2008, 07:08:17 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=310x463

Oh my.

Quote
TheBorealAvenger  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-15-05 10:41 AM
Original message

Do you think "little cars" handle well in deep snow?
   
Two decades ago, I drove cars the size of the old Corolla. At ~2100 pounds these vehicles got "pushed around" a lot in the deep snow. We get a lot of snow in Cleveland. It is not uncommon to get a foot of snow and have to drive home in it. I would be scared to drive my old B210 if I still had it.

Those little cars had trouble changing lanes when you hit "the wall" of snow outside of the rutted tire paths. Big trucks flung snow all over them. Even in fair weather, those vintage compact cars feel overwhelmed when commuting in the 21st century world of big passenger vehicles (SUVs, pickups, & minivans). The "car talk" guys say buy something that is 3000 pounds or bigger for safety if you have to drive on the highway. However, efficiency in that weight range is notably less than the new economy cars like the Focus, Corolla, and Civic.

So my question is, what would I expect from the 21st century economy cars that weigh 2600 or 2700 pounds? White knuckles or confidence? I know snow tires have improved, but how about the rest of the car? Does all that power help? How about the more responsive steering of modern vehicles? (Have I asked enough questions?)

You know, back in my salad days when I was green in judgement, I used an old American Motors Gremlin; the hatchback was handy for toting beer kegs around.

This was during global cooling, when Lincoln got lots and lots of knee-deep snow for several winters in a row.

I don't recall any particular problems, but then and again, it's not the vehicle, but the driver; a lousy driver can't handle even a good vehicle well under the best of conditions, while a good driver can handle a lousy vehicle expertly under the worst of conditions.

Quote
jayfish  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-15-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message

1. My Thoughts.
   
I've been driving in snow since I've had my license and have driven almost any type of car you can think of in the snow. For me it has always been about a cars drive-train. More specifically front-drive v. rear-drive. I have driven small cars with front-drive that handled even the deepest snow with ease. I've driven big cars with rear-drive that were terrifying in the snow. Modern traction control systems my help with some of the rear-drive issues but for me, if your in the snow, it's front-drive no matter the size.

Quote
TheBorealAvenger  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-15-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. My 2950 pound Celebrity wagon was a world better than the Datsun 210
   
That is comparing a FWD car vs. a minimalist RWD car with a straight rear axle and leaf springs. I also have a data point of a 1981 Ford Fairmont that I replaced with the Celebrity in 1989. From what I recall, the RWD Fairmont, with the same weight as the Celebrity, was pretty good in the snowy weather. I only drove it two winters and don't recall any scary moments. Then again, that was 16 years ago!

White knuckles was when I drove a RWD 1973 Pontiac Catalina on the freeway in the snow. That monster 400 cu in engine gave the sedan a front heavy weight distribution and I was losing traction often. It had all-season tires, not snow tires. I was also quite inexperienced and had none of the skills and knowledge I have now. That car was in the two ton range, and behemoth weight did not give it the winter advantage it needed.

My GF, who is doing the car shopping now, recalls being happy with her FWD Dodge Charger (the cousin of the Omni) in the snow. I would guess that vehicle was probably 2200 or 2300 pounds. So on the balance, your FWD/RWD opinion seems sound.

Quote
nickinSTL  (1000+ posts) Sep-16-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message

3. I had a 1996 Corolla
   
front wheel drive, traction control wasn't available on Corollas in the mid-'90s.

I slid all over the damn place. Even on wet roads, the tires would spin if I tried to start moving on an incline.

I finally bought a 4WD because we get just enough snow and ice that I didn't feel safe driving it.

However, we briefly had a 1997 Saturn wagon with front wheel drive and traction control, and it was great. We couldn't get the tires to spin even on packed snow/ice.

So, I'd say that as long as you've got traction control, you're probably ok.

Quote
midnight armadillo  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Oct-28-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message

4. I never had trouble with little cars
   
My past cars have included an '85 Nissan Sentra wagon, a '90 Camry (~2900 lbs), and a '93 Corolla. I never had any trouble with snow in any of them, especially with good tires. All were FWD. The Camry with its stick shift was especially good since there was lots of road feedback in the steering & handling (not at all like a recent Camry). No traction control on any of these for Mass. driving.

Just get good tires, and traction control if you can. ABS is more important :-)

The Nokian WR all-season tire is the finest on the market if you want a year-round tire that will kick serious ass in the snow. I have 'em on my Subaru and they're great.

Forgive the ignorance, but what is "ABS"?

Quote
Warpy  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Mar-31-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message

5. I drove my VW to work during the blizzard of 78 in eastern Massachusetts.

I didn't find out the Gov had shut the state down until I got there.

But the warped primitive's a nurse; surely he understood that even if nobody else could get to work, he had to.

Even if on snow-shoes or by dog-sled; professional ethics.

Quote
sam sarrha  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sat Apr-22-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message

6. it has a lot to do with the tires.. i prefer front wheel drive. my 65 VW was like a little tank in mud and snow.. it went anywhere..

my 1956 1100 104D Fiat had high clearance and 14 inch tires.. and a reverse gear lower than granny low.. what i couldnt drive up i backed up.. i used it for scrambling around the high sierra fire roads.. if i got in sand or gravel and spun out i jacked it up and pushed it foward off the jack again and again till i got out of the bad patch and went on.. it was like a jeep.. just amazing.

i have a 1589cc 1987 Nissan Sentra.. and i just love it, it is quite abit like driving a vw..
i lived in Tahoe for several years, i had a set of knobby snow tires for winter.. no problem, but regular tires were a pain..

Quote
Ready4Change  (1000+ posts) May-01-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message

7. To me, tires make the largest difference.
   
2600, 2700 lbs is heavy. compared to smaller cars of yesteryear. Snow tires have become wonderfull. (REAL snow tires, not all seasons.) Todays new cars are nearly all better controlled than older cars. Power does NOT help in the snow. You can't ask too many questions.

Too much weight can be a detriment in snow. If you don't have extra traction to counter it, that weight makes it harder to stop, harder to turn, and easier to sink in and get stuck.

Good snow tires can turn a winter garage queen into a virtual Jeep. Bad tires can turn a Jeep into a winter garage queen.

Snow driving is an art, that needs to be practiced. Each year I find an empty parking lot and practice in the first snow fall, to re-awaken old skills. Snow driving takes focus and awareness. Driving to slowly or too timidly is almost as bad as too fast and too aggressive. Approach it as a skill to be mastered, rather than a challenge to be feared.

When the snow gets taller than your ground clearance you've got problems. This is, IMO, the ONLY time bigger cars have an advantage in the snow.

To me, RWD and FWD are different, not better or worse. AWD has an advantage, but it's not enough if you've got rotten tires, can't drive, or the snow is too deep.

My evidence? I used to drive my old '69 MGB around in the snow, looking for 4WD pickups stuck in ditches who I could help get back up on the roads. Most of those guys would turn down my offers to help. Oh well!

Quote
nerddem  (151 posts) Fri Jul-20-07 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #7

9. haha, i can relate
   
this past winter i drove around in and after one of the blizzards that hit philadelphia in a 96 z3 with shitty tires, but i was able to parallel park and everything

Quote
kysrsoze  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-09-07 01:35 AM
Response to Original message

8. I think small FWD cars are great in snow
   
My fiance's last car was a VW Jetta and it was great in snow - like a little tank. My friend and I had twin cars - a '93 Eagle Summit and Mistubishi Mirage. We drove both of them back from spring break through the 13" snowfall in Alabama. We had 13" wheels with tires about 6 inches wide. We made it ALL the way home - driving across medians filled with snow and passing some jeeps people had driven into ditches. Small, fairly light FWD cars are great in snow as long as they have decent tread - it's all about having weight on the wheels. My current RWD car is OK on snow, but only b/c I have good all-season tires on it. My fiance now has an Acura TSX and it's decent, but no great in snow - most likely b/c it has wide performance tires.

Quote
safeinOhio  Donating Member  (83 posts) Sep-02-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8

10. Tire width on small cars
   
I had an Escort the first year they came out. Was great in snow. The newer ones and Focus have wide profile tires that tend to float on top of the snow. The old narrow tires would cut in and give you some bite. Anyone else remember the "good ole days"?

Quote
benEzra  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sat Feb-16-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message

11. Lightweight FWD cars work pretty well in the snow...and small AWD cars work almost as well as 4-wheel-drive SUV's (the only real difference is ground clearance).

This is a little heavier than you were looking at, but it's an excellent performer in the snow with AWD:

http://www.volvocars.us/models/s40 /

after which a photograph of some black sedan

If you get one with performance tires, you'd definitely want to get some cheap wheels and skinnier winter tires from Tire Rack, though.
apres moi, le deluge

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
Re: primitives discuss driving in deep snow
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2008, 07:25:06 AM »
ABS is the anti-locking brake system.  It use to be a good way to get a foot massage.  It made the pedal "pulse" when it kicked in.

This southern boy keeps his car in the garage until the snow is gone the next day.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58679
  • Reputation: +3057/-173
Re: primitives discuss driving in deep snow
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2008, 07:27:05 AM »
ABS is the anti-locking brake system.  It use to be a good way to get a foot massage.  It made the pedal "pulse" when it kicked in.

I wondered if that might be it, but I thought the proper acronym for that was ALBS, not ABS.
apres moi, le deluge

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15737
  • Reputation: +1713/-170
Re: primitives discuss driving in deep snow
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2008, 09:13:24 AM »
Why worry about snow driving when the world will be under water from globull warming?
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.