That one's too stupid, and for too many different reasons, to even try to explain. I could write a 3-5 page legal analysis memo of just how FUBAR this is.
God save us from that...
Their obsession with explaining precedence to the world last month was quite enough already... and then again this month with their conveniently modified use of innocence presumption. One can only absorb a certain amount of their idiocy before shutting down.
Thing is (from my non-expert viewpoint), as much as we all bust on it sometimes, US law is grounded in common sense and civility about 98% of the time. Meaning, a person of civil and fair nature can look at an argument and come to a reasonable basic conclusion that will align with written law most times, all while knowing very little about written law itself. This concept appears to escape their tiny pinko minds. Like everything else within the reach of their inferior brains, law is just a tool that can be re-forged at will to further assist their quest for power and control, and it means nothing more than that to them.