Seems like the primitives are no longer allowed to question the annointed Popebama.
This thread is about a lawsuit filed over intimidation and illegal investigation tactics, not about the sex
and drug accusations made before by the same individual. Sounds to me like the plaintiff's civil rights
have been infringed upon....wait...shouldn't the DUmmies be on his side? They would be if it was anyone
other than their sainted savior....but being as it showed the Popebama in a negative light it was locked so
it would fall down to not be seen.
I cannot wait until Rush takes this and runs with it.
_______________________________________________________________________
citizen_jane (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-15-08 07:33 PM
Original message
Larry Sinclair v. Barack Obama
Larry Sinclair filed suit in Minnesota District Court on Monday against Barack Obama, along with Obama’s campaign strategist David Axelrod and others, regarding issues stemming from Sinclair’s allegations that he used cocaine and performed a sexual act with Obama in 1999. Abbreviated excerpt:
This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981, 18 U.S.C. 241 and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution’s right to Freedom of Speech. Defendants have and continue to conspire against the rights of citizens in that they are actively engaged in ongoing internet intimidation, claim to be conducting illegal investigations into plaintiff’s personal life, actively involved in preventing allegations of illegal drug use and sexual activity involving Defendant Obama from becoming public knowledge.
Plaintiff states that he personally engaged in sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999 with U.S. Senator Barack Obama on two separate occasions. Plaintiff states that he attempted to contact defendant Obama in the fall of 2007 to advise defendant Obama to make his 1999 use of illegal drugs public himself and that if he did not do so then plaintiff would have no choice but to come forward as defendants’ actions were relevant to his running for President of the United States. Defendant Obama ignored plaintiffs attempts to allow defendant Obama to reveal this information on his own.
http://bigheaddc.com/2008/02/14/larry-sinclair-v-barack... /
----------------------------
Why hasn't Obama just denounced this instead
of intimidating the accuser.
_______________________________________________________
Link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4610464It has a pic of the actual document filed in Court. A few replies mostly crying slander and slime.