Do not 'dis' the Popebama on Skin's island! :D

[lizard]

Seems like the primitives are no longer allowed to question the annointed Popebama.   

This thread is about a lawsuit filed over intimidation and illegal investigation tactics, not about the sex
and drug accusations made before by the same individual.  Sounds to me like the plaintiff's civil rights
have been infringed upon....wait...shouldn't the DUmmies be on his side? They would be if it was anyone
other than their sainted savior....but being as it showed the Popebama in a negative light it was locked so
it would fall down to not be seen.

I cannot wait until Rush  takes this and runs with it. 


_______________________________________________________________________

citizen_jane  (1000+ posts)       Fri Feb-15-08 07:33 PM
Original message
Larry Sinclair v. Barack Obama
 

Larry Sinclair filed suit in Minnesota District Court on Monday against Barack Obama, along with Obama’s campaign strategist David Axelrod and others, regarding issues stemming from Sinclair’s allegations that he used cocaine and performed a sexual act with Obama in 1999. Abbreviated excerpt:

This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981, 18 U.S.C. 241 and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution’s right to Freedom of Speech. Defendants have and continue to conspire against the rights of citizens in that they are actively engaged in ongoing internet intimidation, claim to be conducting illegal investigations into plaintiff’s personal life, actively involved in preventing allegations of illegal drug use and sexual activity involving Defendant Obama from becoming public knowledge.

Plaintiff states that he personally engaged in sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999 with U.S. Senator Barack Obama on two separate occasions. Plaintiff states that he attempted to contact defendant Obama in the fall of 2007 to advise defendant Obama to make his 1999 use of illegal drugs public himself and that if he did not do so then plaintiff would have no choice but to come forward as defendants’ actions were relevant to his running for President of the United States. Defendant Obama ignored plaintiffs attempts to allow defendant Obama to reveal this information on his own.

http://bigheaddc.com/2008/02/14/larry-sinclair-v-barack... /

----------------------------

Why hasn't Obama just denounced this instead
of intimidating the accuser.

_______________________________________________________

Link:  http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4610464

It has a pic of the actual document filed in Court.  A few replies mostly crying slander and slime. 

[Carl]

Thought in light of everything thrown at President Bush every second of the day at the DUmp the first response was hilariously ironic.

fenriswolf  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-15-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. because if he had to refute every individual claim
   he would spend his entire day refuting these claims. Do you really think obama snorted cocaine and perfomed sexual acts with this man? its freaking rediculas.

[Lord Undies]

fenriswolf  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-15-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. because if he had to refute every individual claim
   he would spend his entire day refuting these claims. Do you really think obama snorted cocaine and perfomed sexual acts with this man? its freaking rediculas.

It could only be 'rediculas' if Obama had 'diculased' with the guy before.

[franksolich]

You know, the lupine ferris-wheel primitive, the primitive whose comments remind one very much of a bewildered wolf on a circular carnival ride, is proving a real disappointment.

After the legendary herb primitive got chased off the island (no, he wasn't banned; he just got tired of the harassment, and silently left), I was looking around for new primitive literary talent, and thought perhaps the lupine ferris-wheel primitive would fill the bill.

Alas, no, the lupine ferris-wheel primitive can't even spell, much less connect thoughts together.

<<still looking for new primitive literary talent.

[Carl]

You know, the lupine ferris-wheel primitive, the primitive whose comments remind one very much of a bewildered wolf on a circular carnival ride, is proving a real disappointment.

After the legendary herb primitive got chased off the island (no, he wasn't banned; he just got tired of the harassment, and silently left), I was looking around for new primitive literary talent, and thought perhaps the lupine ferris-wheel primitive would fill the bill.

Alas, no, the lupine ferris-wheel primitive can't even spell, much less connect thoughts together.

<<still looking for new primitive literary talent.

You are asking a lot from them Frank.

[jukin]

NEVER count the Clintonias out of a race.

[miskie]

Humm, I wonder... If this goes to trial, is there a prominent  Attorney who could deal with it ??

How about This Guy ? -- Do you think he will do ?   

[dandi]

fenriswolf  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-15-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. because if he had to refute every individual claim
   he would spend his entire day refuting these claims.

Wow, really? Are there that many similar claims out there?

Do you really think obama snorted cocaine and perfomed sexual acts with this man? its freaking rediculas.

Why is it ridiculous? You got something against a little toot for the snoot and some hot man-on-man action? I would think such behavior would be a plus in DUmmy eyes.

[TheSarge]

Almost wrecked the car the other morning listening to this woman describe Obama as "messianic" and as Chris Core was trying to hang up on her she blurted out how he was going to save the country and save the world.
 

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

fenriswolf  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-15-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. because if he had to refute every individual claim
   he would spend his entire day refuting these claims. Do you really think obama snorted cocaine and perfomed sexual acts with this man? its freaking rediculas.

And Bush unspeechly one, huh?