VIDEO: Remember When Pfizer Paxlovid Pill Was Hyped While Ivermectin Slammed?

[pjcomix]

In late 2021, Pfizer and its paid lackeys in the media and government were in panic mode. Vaccine skepticism had already set in and Ivermectin was proving to be a safe, effective, and inexpensive treatment. In addition, almost NOBODY believed the propaganda the Pfizer-paid media (especially by Joe Rogan hating CNN) hurled against Ivermectin. So what happened? Pfizer came up with its own answer to Ivermectin, Paxlovid, which not only had multiple side-effects but at over $1300 for a five day course was much more expensive than a very safe Ivermectin which cost only about $30 for 20 3 mg tablets.

Thankfully the FDA has now been forced to ditch its previous warnings against Ivermectin. However, as a result of MISINFORMATION promulgated by the Pfizer lackeys in the media and the government (including FDA) many people unnecessarily died. The one upside is that people are now so skeptical of corporate and media propaganda now that the friend of a notorious sex-trafficker, Bill Gates, was forced to ditch his COVID vaccine racket because few are buying what he and others are selling.

https://rumble.com/v4lg1zr-remember-when-pfizer-paxlovid-pill-was-hyped-while-ivermectin-slammed.html

[SVPete]

While Paxlovid is sold by bogey-Pfizer your conspiracy theory has anachronism problem and a problem of there being competition for Paxlovid.

1. The whole HCQ-Ivermectin kerfuffle began in spring or summer 2020. Paxlovid was approved by the FDA in May 2023. Paxlovid was approved 3 years or so after the HCQ-Ivermectin kerfuffle.

2. In October 2020 the FDA also approved another anti-viral drug treatment that would be a head-to-head competition against Paxlovid. If bogey-Pfizer was in a conspiracy with the FDA to set up Paxlovid as THE go-to for treating Covid, how did Gilead (not bogey-Pfizer) get remdesivir (trade name Veklury) approved for treating Covid? (BTW, contrary to a common HCQ/Ivermectin-True-Believer claim, remdesivir is not deadly. Just ask someone who received it about that ... such as Donald Trump ... or me.) BTW, a Gilead-FDA conspiracy-theory also has an anachronism problem too, as a clinical trial of remdesivir against the SARS-CoV-2 virus began in February 2020.

[pjcomix]

While Paxlovid is sold by bogey-Pfizer your conspiracy theory has anachronism problem and a problem of there being competition for Paxlovid.

1. The whole HCQ-Ivermectin kerfuffle began in spring or summer 2020. Paxlovid was approved by the FDA in May 2023. Paxlovid was approved 3 years or so after the HCQ-Ivermectin kerfuffle.

2. In October 2020 the FDA also approved another anti-viral drug treatment that would be a head-to-head competition against Paxlovid. If bogey-Pfizer was in a conspiracy with the FDA to set up Paxlovid as THE go-to for treating Covid, how did Gilead (not bogey-Pfizer) get remdesivir (trade name Veklury) approved for treating Covid? (BTW, contrary to a common HCQ/Ivermectin-True-Believer claim, remdesivir is not deadly. Just ask someone who received it about that ... such as Donald Trump ... or me.) BTW, a Gilead-FDA conspiracy-theory also has an anachronism problem too, as a clinical trial of remdesivir against the SARS-CoV-2 virus began in February 2020.

If that's true then why was was Biden hyping Paxlovid in January 2022?

[SVPete]

If that's true then why was was Biden hyping Paxlovid in January 2022?

1. "IF"? Are you seriously questioning that May 2023 date?         Do you really think I pulled that date from my excessively substantial rump? Posting this should not be necessary, but FDA Approves First Oral Antiviral for Treatment of COVID-19 in Adults. This was easily found using the mediocre, non-Google, Duck Duck Go search engine.

2. Assuming your claim, "... Biden hyping Paxlovid in January 2022," is accurate, so what? The HCQ/Ivermectin kerfuffle still started in mid 2020. Whether the anachronism is 3 years or 1 1/2 years, it still contradicts the Pfizer-Paxlovid conspiracy theory. As for Biden "hyping" Paxlovid in 2022, it just means that Paxlovid had been given Emergency Use Authorization in December 2021, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-revises-letter-authorization-emergency-use-authorization-paxlovid , 4th paragraph. This was easily found using the mediocre, non-Google, Duck Duck Go search engine.

ETA: Knowing that EUA is only given after some clinical trial testing, I looked for when the trial was started, and found that it was in late August 2021, https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/pfizer-antiviral-covid-trial/?cf-view (the article date is September 2, but I assume there were a few days' delay between dosing and publication). That is a few months closer to the HCQ/Ivermectin controversy, but there is still over a year's span of anachronism. More plainly, Ivermectin was being "Slammed" over a year before the clinical trial of Paxlovid started.

[pjcomix]

Check out the DATE of when Biden suffered a COVID rebound AFTER taking Paxlovid.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/30/biden-covid-rebound-paxlovid-00048349

1. "IF"? Are you seriously questioning that May 2023 date?         Do you really think I pulled that date from my excessively substantial rump? Posting this should not be necessary, but FDA Approves First Oral Antiviral for Treatment of COVID-19 in Adults. This was easily found using the mediocre, non-Google, Duck Duck Go search engine.

2. Assuming your claim, "... Biden hyping Paxlovid in January 2022," is accurate, so what? The HCQ/Ivermectin kerfuffle still started in mid 2020. Whether the anachronism is 3 years or 1 1/2 years, it still contradicts the Pfizer-Paxlovid conspiracy theory. As for Biden "hyping" Paxlovid in 2022, it just means that Paxlovid had been given Emergency Use Authorization in December 2021, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-revises-letter-authorization-emergency-use-authorization-paxlovid , 4th paragraph. This was easily found using the mediocre, non-Google, Duck Duck Go search engine.

ETA: Knowing that EUA is only given after some clinical trial testing, I looked for when the trial was started, and found that it was in late August 2021, https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/pfizer-antiviral-covid-trial/?cf-view (the article date is September 2, but I assume there were a few days' delay between dosing and publication). That is a few months closer to the HCQ/Ivermectin controversy, but there is still over a year's span of anachronism. More plainly, Ivermectin was being "Slammed" over a year before the clinical trial of Paxlovid started.

[SVPete]

Check out the DATE of when Biden suffered a COVID rebound AFTER taking Paxlovid.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/30/biden-covid-rebound-paxlovid-00048349

The HCQ/Ivermectin kerfuffle started in spring or summer 2020. How do you get around the anachronism with an event that happened two years afterward? Your conspiracy theory simply cannot work. Time machines are a century-old H. G. Wells fiction, not a bogey-Pfizer invention.

[pjcomix]

The HCQ/Ivermectin kerfuffle started in spring or summer 2020. How do you get around the anachronism with an event that happened two years afterward? Your conspiracy theory simply cannot work. Time machines are a century-old H. G. Wells fiction, not a bogey-Pfizer invention.

So how does Politico have a story dated in 2022 about Biden having a COVID rebound AFTER taking Paxlovid?

[SVPete]

So how does Politico have a story dated in 2022 about Biden having a COVID rebound AFTER taking Paxlovid?

Irrelevant. Your conspiracy theory fails due to anachronism.

[pjcomix]

Irrelevant. Your conspiracy theory fails due to anachronism.<p>

So we just IGNORE the 2022 time stamps of multiple videos and stories in order to pretend the incidents I cited couldn't have  happened until 2023? And remember, UP is the opposite of DOWN except in the fifth dimension where UP is three miles east of Philadelphia.