Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Who is the person LEAST QUALIFIED to lecture Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on the subject of ethics? It would have to be that DUmmie fraudster best known for perpetrating the Karl Rove indictment hoax "scoop," known as WILLIAM RIVERS PITT. However, Pitt conveniently forgets his ethically challenged past as a fraudster as well as his history of posting violent fantasies to claim that Thomas is lacking in ethics as you can see in the Fraudster's THREAD, "Clarence Thomas Must Go - my argument." Yeah, and before you start lecturing Justice Thomas, how about if you MAN UP and accept responsibility for the FRAUD you perpetrated about that May 12, 2006 "indictment?" The closest Pitt ever came was his whining and voluminous partial birth NON-APOLOGY chock full of self pity. Cowardly Pitt NEVER took responsibility for his fraud yet he now blasts the ethics of Justice Thomas.
Those who wondered about the motives behind the recent call from 74 congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from any cases involving ObamaCare may now have their answer.But concerns about judicial integrity had nothing to do with it. The Democrats staged a preemptive strike so they'd have an argument to counter Kagan's gaping and genuine conflict of interest regarding ObamaCare when it was inevitably exposed.As Judicial Watch details, a Jan. 8, 2010, e-mail from Neal Katyal, former deputy solicitor general (and current acting solicitor general) to Brian Hauck, senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, discussing organizing the defense of ObamaCare against the inevitable legal challenges, wrote: "Brian, Elena would definitely like OSG (Office of Solicitor General) to be involved in this set of issues ... we will bring in Elena as needed."On March 21, 2010, the day ObamaCare passed the House of Representatives, Katyal urged Kagan to attend a health care litigation meeting that was evidently organized by the Obama White House. It is not credible to suggest Kagan did not attend or did not contribute. An e-mail chain on that date, entitled "Health care litigation meeting," refers to an "internal government meeting regarding the expected litigation." Kagan is both author and recipient in the chain.After Kagan was nominated on May 10, 2010, for the Supreme Court, Katyal began spreading the cover story insisting that Kagan was "walled off" from such discussions, This is after Katyal invited Kagan to administration meetings to discuss precisely that. Another email trail unearthed by Judicial Watch discusses everyone getting his or her story story straight about Kagan's sudden lack of involvement in ObamaCare's defense.On May 17, 2010, for example, Tracy Schmaler, a Department of Justice spokesperson, wrote to Katyal asking if Kagan had been involved in ObamaCare defense strategy. Katyal responded that she had not been. He forwarded the exchange to Kagan, saying, "This is what I told Tracy about HealthCare."Kagan's response speaks volumes about her involvement in ObamaCare's legal defense: "This needs to be coordinated. Tracy you should not say anything about this before talking to me." We are reminded of the adage that if you tell the truth you never have to get your story straight or be "coordinated."
Justice Thomas had better watch his step. He could find himself being scraped from a boot heel with a knife, and fed to Pitt's cat.
