The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on November 26, 2019, 10:29:37 PM

Title: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: dutch508 on November 26, 2019, 10:29:37 PM
Quote
Star Member EffieBlack (14,156 posts) Mon Nov 25, 2019, 06:39 PM
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212729131

So far, my friend's been right: The judiciary IS holding!

"The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212113242

Quote
Star Member EffieBlack (14,156 posts)
Mon May 20, 2019, 06:29 PM

"The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
A few weeks ago, a dear old friend, a Republican-appointed federal judge, trying to console me during a moment of despair about the future of our country, said to me “The Judiciary branch is strong and will hold.” When I expressed skepticism, he leaned toward me, looked me dead in the eye, and said as firmly as he could without shouting: “We are strong and WE. WILL. HOLD.”

Today, thanks to Judge Mehta, I think he may be right ...


 :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

Quote
Star Member Roland99 (45,660 posts)

1. SCOTUS is different tho. Thanks to #MoscowMitch

Quote
OliverQ (2,397 posts)

3. It's hard to believe that considering how many corrupt, unqualified judges McConnell has approved.

Quote
Star Member budkin (4,041 posts)

6. It means nothing when SCOTUS is the final word

Its Trump's court now.

Quote
DonaldsRump (808 posts)

53. As awful as Kavanaugh is ...

Last edited Mon Nov 25, 2019, 10:41 PM - Edit history (1)

Remember that he was George W. Bush's lawyer. GWB hates Trump. Kavanaugh now no longers owes anything to the Dumbass-in-Chief.

During Watergate, Nixon also banked on his appointments to SCOTUS voting for him in US v. Nixon (aka the Tapes Case). None of them did.

I was talking to one of my children today about CJ Roberts. I told my child that I cannot imagine that he would allow the Supreme Court to side with Trump on outright stonewalling of Congress by the President. That would result in the immediate destruction of the three co-equal branches of government in the US.

Then again, what do I know!

Quote
amywalk (188 posts)

52. Kavanaugh and Anthony Kennedy have seriously compromised

themselves with their criminal behavior. Justice Kennedy gave up his seat so that his son wouldn’t be in trouble. He works for Deutsche Bank and gave the Trumps and Kushners a billion dollar loan that saved his ass. This was a criminal conspiracy between Trump, Kennedy, Kennedy, Kavanaugh, Kushner and whoever paid his debts off. I feel like this will eventually come out as most things like this do. It doesn’t mean they will be punished, but a girl can dream, right?

Quote
Star Member malaise (198,703 posts)

11. The institutions are holding

**** Don the Con and his enablers

Quote
Star Member ancianita (12,043 posts)

12. While I can't stand Roberts, I know that he knows he will have to stand with the appeals courts

if ANY appeal gets a certoriari by SCOTUS.

As he goes, so the others will, so that the ruling will be unanimous.

But I doubt any appeal case will get a certoriari, because the arguments are stupid, by appeals justices opinions, so far; and because SCOTUS justices (I hope) know that the rest of the well argued and written precedent rulings preclude their listening to any appeals brought forward at all, at this point.

Roberts will just go sit there in the Senate, say and do nothing, hide his pleasure over the Senate exoneration of Trump. And the Repub traitors will know how he feels.

It will be just the way he presided over the prepping of the team that argued Gore v Bush before SCOTUS in the 2000 presidential.

I hold John Roberts as activist as any justice in US history.

Bush and Roberts ****ed this country over.

And here we are in this sickening, toxic place with democracy in chains.

Quote
yaesu (2,421 posts)

17. Nope, they will break eventually, a Democracy will not stand under the weight of fascist capitalism

Quote
Star Member Laura PourMeADrink (30,029 posts)

49. Hope so much it is true. Throughout all this abomination I have thought...JHC are there no sane reps in House..in Senate, in the Military, in the DOJ, in the SD..I worked for the govt in DC...there are so many fine, honest, admirable, intelligent people. Too many to let the monster win.

 :rotf:
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: franksolich on November 26, 2019, 10:53:46 PM
Quote
a Democracy will not stand under the weight of fascist capitalism

Nor, as is obviously going on, under the weight of Democrat decadence and corruption.
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on November 27, 2019, 08:45:29 AM
Quote
Star Member ancianita (12,043 posts)

12.

But I doubt any appeal case will get a certoriari, because the arguments are stupid, by appeals justices opinions, so far; and because SCOTUS justices (I hope) know that the rest of the well argued and written precedent rulings preclude their listening to any appeals brought forward at all, at this point.
Is it just me or is anyone else have trouble reading the sentence posted above? I feel like I am suffering from some sort of aphasia when I try to read it.


Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: SVPete on November 27, 2019, 08:57:21 AM
DUpipo have no sympathy for conservatives who will lose their bogeyclown circuit when Trump "flips" the Ninth?! :rotf: What callous jerks! :rotf:  :tongue:
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: ADsOutburst on November 27, 2019, 09:09:41 AM
Quote
...a Democracy will not stand under the weight of fascist capitalism
This sentence will not stand under the weight of this oxymoron.
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: Drafe Hoblin on November 27, 2019, 09:42:42 AM
OliverQ (2,397 posts)

3. It's hard to believe that considering how many corrupt, unqualified judges McConnell has approved.



Your boy changed the rules to confirmation by a simple majority, even though he was implicitly warned not to.  How's it taste?
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: BadCat on November 27, 2019, 11:35:51 AM
Just wait for RGB to leave us.  Man, the head explosions will be something to see.
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: landofconfusion80 on November 27, 2019, 02:50:32 PM
Just wait for RGB to leave us.  Man, the head explosions will be something to see.
At first glance the title of this post made me think that's what happened
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: jukin on November 27, 2019, 03:37:46 PM
Just wait for RGB to leave us.  Man, the head explosions will be something to see.

All I want for Christmas is a room temperature RBG.
Title: Re: "The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD"
Post by: landofconfusion80 on November 27, 2019, 05:07:19 PM
All I want for Christmas is a room temperature RBG.
It's got to be close. Imagine her nurses dread at the cold clammy grip of having to hoist her up every morning