The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: fatboy on April 20, 2018, 01:17:50 PM
-
Democratic Party suing Trump and his henchmen:
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 11:04 AM
Kingofalldems (26,935 posts)
Democratic Party suing Trump and his henchmen:
twitter link: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/987345648717651968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F100210518420
Fire up the orgasmatron
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210518420
I do have a question for DUmmy Kingofalldems. If Putin is pulling Trump's strings and in charge of things and Trump is his lacky, then how come the OP writer referrs to Putin as one of Trump's henchmen?
Response to Corgigal (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 11:08 AM
BoneyardDem (1,142 posts)
2. If they are suing for $Millions, it appears to be a civil suit.
There is a preponderance of evidence for that
Right. It's invisable. You need special glasses to view it.
Response to Corgigal (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 11:36 AM
Sophia4 (2,152 posts)
5. The Democrats can request or even subpoena discovery and obtain
relevant documents, depositions, etc.
Of course it will be done in the civil courts. And the courts are a separate and equal, independent branch of government.
Those on the receiving side of the complaint, don't they have the same right? And would not the complaint need to produce some evidence to go along with the filing? And just how exactly does the DNC have access to the "evidence" that the Mueller team has put together? And what will Tom "Einstein" Perez say when the Trump campaign in defense asks him in court the simple most obvious question "why the DNC didn't hand over their server to the FBI to investigate the hack?" And "produce the server now as a part of our discovery".
Response to Corgigal (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 11:54 AM
The Velveteen Ocelot (59,502 posts)
6. It's a civil case. Assuming the complaint survives a motion to dismiss,
the plaintiffs can conduct discovery entirely apart from the Mueller investigation
Overall a subdued response to another Democrat attempt at crash and burn.
-
Tell Lucy to order another case or two of footballs.
-
Tom Perez has gone full retard.
-
And the only thing they're missing after several investigations lasting well over a year is any actual evidence.
They have a lot of nerve considering what they did to Sanders in the primary.
BTW, how are those DNC servers?
.
-
:rotf:
the dummies think this is a good idea? It'll probably be dismissed but they aren't afraid of discovery? This is a good sign for the midterms, they're going to try to run on Russian collusion.
-
Mayb Trump can sue them for the fake Dossier, that would be a hoot if he could bankrupt the DNC. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
-
If BantheGOP attempted to rejoin the DUmp, he would be rejected for being too right-wing, compared to this crowd.
-
Desperate plea for attention. They must have finally realized the Mueller thing isn't going to go anywhere, ultimately.
-
Mayb Trump can sue them for the fake Dossier, that would be a hoot if he could bankrupt the DNC. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Team Trump has responded:
... If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:
How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.
Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.
How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.
How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.
Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more...
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-responds-to-frivolous-dnc-lawsuit/ (https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-responds-to-frivolous-dnc-lawsuit/)
It is quite possible that the DNC shredders started overheating months ago, as well as the high-powered magnets erasing the laptops and cel phones. There will be nothing to see, and incipient Alzheimer’s will become an epidemic among all Dems involved.
Unless…they are really stupid and arrogant enough to think their files and computers are somehow sacrosanct. :lol:
-
Sue for what? Wikileaks got the information from someone from the DNC who leaked it out. As for Russia, that was proven to be false and a work of a few private Russian citizens.
As far as I am concerned, Wikileaks and Russia had no impact on 2016 Election.
-
Sue for what? Wikileaks got the information from someone from the DNC who leaked it out. As for Russia, that was proven to be false and a work of a few private Russian citizens.
As far as I am concerned, Wikileaks and Russia had no impact on 2016 Election.
What had the largest impact, the most influence, on how the 2016 elections turned out was the caliber of the Democrat candidate for president.
-
Doesn't mean a thing. This is how the Dims play politics and keep their goobers involved. If they have nothing else going on,they announce a lawsuit to rally their troops and bring the donations in again.
And it has to be said the alleged Republican Party does the same thing these days.
The fact is if any of them had anything they had any hope of proving they would be filing criminal charges. They don't have any evidence to prove anything,so they go with innuendo and try to influence public opinion. This rallies their drones and the hope is they can fool enough of the "I only vote once every 4 years for whoever has the cutest candidate/wife" voters that vote on emotion instead of knowledge/political awareness.
Chances are none of this is going to get any closer to a courtroom than on the headlines of a newspaper someone leaves there.
-
And the only thing they're missing after several investigations lasting well over a year is any actual evidence.
Ahhhh,but you don't need no stinking evidence if you have a newspaper editor in your pocket,and your goal is to spread rumors to harm your political opponents. All you need is allegations. People tend to believe the RUMORS they hear reported on tv and read in their daily newspapers as being facts,NOT allegations,so the political damage is done.
-
What had the largest impact, the most influence, on how the 2016 elections turned out was the caliber of the Democrat candidate for president.
That's the one thing DU-grade Progs and party-line Ds dare not admit. HilLIARy is horribly corrupt, inept, and arrogant, and ran a stupid arrogant campaign that paid little attention to the reality of how the Electoral College works, something she should have learned about at age 14 or 15!
-
What had the largest impact, the most influence, on how the 2016 elections turned out was the caliber of the Democrat candidate for president.
Exactly. Hillary Clinton turned the Democratic Party into her personal bank account.
-
Exactly. Hillary Clinton turned the Democratic Party into her personal bank account.
Money-launderer might be more accurate.
-
Exactly. Hillary Clinton turned the Democratic Party into her personal bank account.
And her personal flunkies as well. :thatsright:
And they are still to stupid to have caught on. :-)