I'm not trying to out-credential anyone, so lighten up a bit. I am pointing out that I do know more than the "average Joe" about this stuff. And by the way... if all those employed by Wall Street firms knew what the hell they were doing,
we wouldn't be here.
I never mentioned "minor correction"; please don't put words in my mouth. I'll quote myself again here, just to be sure... (emphasis mine)
Yes, this is serious. No, it's not the end of the world, and it's definitely not the worst depression since the 30s. This is a regular cyclical adjustment, exacerbated by the amount of bad mortgage debt, and the inability of the players to discern quality debt (because of a lack of transparency in the mortgage-backed securities)
Without the bad debt out there, this would just be a regular cyclical adjustment. But it's not, so we do need extraordinary measures to deal with it. I don't know what those measures are, or if the Bush plan will work. Honestly, I doubt that anyone (your infallible SO included) knows right now what needs to happen, because
nobody knows how much of that mortgage debt is bad. The stock rise was because the government finally stepped in and shouldered the burden of the bad debt,
not because "everything's cool". The libertarian side of me disagrees with this action, but the side that is concerned about a repeat of 1987 (24% one-day drop) is okay with it.
I'm more concerned with the proportion of homeowner equity to debt and the foreclosure rate on mortgages; if a bunch of folks just walk away from their mortgages, house prices will fall drastically, making it a lot more attractive for others to walk out of their mortgages. Rinse and repeat. This is where it gets really ugly, and where intervention is necessary. The exact nature of that intervention is the tricky part.