Author Topic: Specially Trained Capitol Hill Staffers to Observe Closely Contested Elections  (Read 458 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
A couple questions, if I may:

Where the hell were you people (congressional committee members) in 2020 when the election was buggier than a Louisiana swamp in late August?

Why was this letter not signed by the so-called "Chairperson" of this House committee?

Why hasn't this "Chairperson" not commented about this letter, what it means, and what it's going to do if it discovers questionable or even illegal election practices?

What is the committee going to do if a state or commonwealth refuses access to these congressional staffer observers? Declare the election null and void?

Why do I get the feeling that this congressional "committee" was just a rubber-stamp operation in previous elections and has just now decided to get off its collective ass and do its job?

Quote
An unspecified number of Capitol Hill aides are being deployed as “official House election observers in close, or particularly cumbersome congressional elections, in the coming weeks,” according to House Administration Committee Ranking Member Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.).

The administration panel is responsible for exercising “the House’s constitutional responsibility to serve as the final ‘Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its Members,'” Davis told officials in identical October 20 letters (pdf) sent to all 50 states.

“While the Constitution grants the House of Representatives this responsibility and authority, the Constitution grants the states primary authority over the administration of federal elections. Committee Republicans respect the limited nature of Congress’ role in this space and are committed to safeguarding states’ vital constitutional authority,” Davis wrote.

“As in past elections, the House will use this legal authority to credential and deploy trained congressional staffers to serve as official House election observers in close, or particularly cumbersome congressional elections, in the coming weeks. This allows us to prepare for the possibility that a candidate could later contest the race in the House of Representatives,” Davis continued.

The staffers involved are doing so under the House Election Observer Program. Davis also launched the Republican members of the administration panel’s Faith in Elections Project: “a comprehensive effort to offer educational opportunities on how elections are administered, engage with key stakeholders, and put forth thoughtful conservative reforms on how elections are run in this country, with states maintaining primary control over their elections.”

The Illinois Republican said the panel “takes seriously its responsibility regarding federal elections, and we are committed to making sure all lawful ballots in congressional races are counted fairly, accurately, and according to law. Our credentialed observers have been trained by experts in election observation and instructed that they play no formal or advocacy role in the administration of the election or the vote counting process; they are to function exclusively as observers.”

The congressional observers “must be granted access to view the process even if state law credentialing, partisan quota, or access requirements exist to the contrary,” he added.

It is not known whether Democrats, who control the House, will be sending members of their staff as election observers. A spokesman for Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the administration panel’s chairman, could not be reached for comment.

Davis’s announcement comes as the 2022 midterm election campaign approaches its end, with Republicans holding what appears to be a sizable overall lead and are thus expected to regain the House majority they lost in 2018. The GOP’s prospects for retaking the Senate majority have also been brightening in recent weeks.

“The 2022 midterm elections are now only 18 days away, and Republicans have a four-point lead in their bid to recapture control of Congress. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that, if the elections for Congress were held today, 47 percent of Likely U.S. Voters would vote for the Republican candidate, while 43 percent would vote for the Democrat. Just four percent would vote for some other candidate, but another seven percent are not sure,” according to Rasmussen Reports.

On the Senate side, Politico wrote Oct. 22 that “Republicans are roaring back in the battle to control the 50-50 Senate. Over the past week, polls show GOP candidates closing the gap in states where Democrats have led all summer—and perhaps pulling away in races that had appeared close for months.”

Davis had been favored to succeed Lofgren as chairman of the administration panel, but he lost a GOP primary to Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.). The two Illinois Republicans were redistricted into the same district by Democrats who control the Illinois state legislature.

Miller was endorsed by former President Donald Trump.

Epoch Times
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18544
  • Reputation: +2037/-49
A couple questions, if I may:

Where the hell were you people (congressional committee members) in 2020 when the election was buggier than a Louisiana swamp in late August?

Why was this letter not signed by the so-called "Chairperson" of this House committee?

Why hasn't this "Chairperson" not commented about this letter, what it means, and what it's going to do if it discovers questionable or even illegal election practices?

What is the committee going to do if a state or commonwealth refuses access to these congressional staffer observers? Declare the election null and void?

Why do I get the feeling that this congressional "committee" was just a rubber-stamp operation in previous elections and has just now decided to get off its collective ass and do its job?

Epoch Times

Trying to figure out what term the left and the media (but I repeat myself) will use when the lose in 16 days. Somehow they'll craft a soft term other than their harsh "ELECTION DENIER" label they toss around.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender