No, DUmbass, I doubt any of us are against early-term abortion in the case of incest, rape, or if delivery may cause deadly harm to the mother. What we're OPPOSED to is you immoral ****s using it as a contraception and many of you leftists exhibit joy in the killing of a child. The overwhelming majority of us are NOT opposed to contraception, but you ****ers took it too far. WAY too far. When Gosnell is a hero of yours? You've went completely off the ****ing rails. MOST of you who I see in protests don't even have anything to worry about anyway. I highly doubt there's a guy that'll give you neither the time nor day....unless he's also a leftist then are you even sure of his gender?
Besides, you low-IQ ****ers who don't read or listen, the overturning of RvW doesn't ban abortion; it sends it back to the states. ALL liberal states will allow it.
It's a hard call, and not a position I would ever want to be involved in in any aspect, but I am opposed to abortions in the horrible cases of rape, and incest, and have not been shown sufficient evidence that the frequency or likely-hood of deadly danger to the mother is enough to leave that option in there. Biblically, nothing happens without God's say so, even things we see as tragedy through out earthly eyes, which means if a woman gets pregnant from any of those events, there's a reason for it. There's some possible argument for the very early one's, but we're living on the slippery slope which that idea goes down.
Other than that, I agree with the rest of your post. The issue of abortion has gone far past any interest in women's safety and rights, and turned into a disregard for human life and just a flat demand to be able to execute your child at whim.
