Author Topic: The Deadly War Against DDT  (Read 2417 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TVDOC

  • General Malcontent and
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5686
  • Reputation: +165/-3
  • Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
The Deadly War Against DDT
« on: September 15, 2010, 12:22:23 PM »
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/246562/deadly-war-against-ddt-elizabeth-m-whelan

Quote
September 15, 2010 4:00 A.M.

The Deadly War against DDT

In its two decades of widespread use, DDT saved more lives than any other man-made chemical. A remarkable new documentary tells the story of how political and ideological forces combined to ban a widely and safely used chemical, DDT, leading to a surge of malaria deaths in developing countries like Kenya, Indonesia, and India.

3 Billion and Counting, which premieres this Friday in Manhattan, was produced by Dr. Rutledge Taylor, a California physician who specializes in preventive medicine. His film will both shock and anger you.

DDT was first synthesized in 1877, but it was not until 1940 that a Swiss chemist demonstrated that it could kill insects without any harm to humans. It was introduced into widespread use during World War II and became the single most important pesticide in maintaining human health for the next two decades. The scientist who discovered the insecticidal properties of DDT, Dr. Paul Müller, was awarded the 1948 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on DDT. (In the 1940s and 1950s the chemical was the “secret” ingredient in a popular new cocktail, the Mickey Slim: gin, with a pinch of DDT.)

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s lyrical but scientifically flawed book, Silent Spring, argued eloquently, but erroneously, that pesticides, especially DDT, were poisoning both wildlife and the environment – and also endangering human health. The National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the U.S. surgeon general were among those who dismissed these charges and came out in support of continuing to use DDT to fight disease and protect crops. A federal hearing was held on the safety of DDT, and in April 1972 Judge Edmund Sweeney concluded that not only was DDT safe, but it was an essential chemical. Two months later, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, William Ruckelshaus – who had never attended a single day’s session of the EPA’s hearings and admitted that he had not read the transcripts — overturned the judge’s decision, declaring, without evidence, that DDT was “a potential human carcinogen” and banned it for virtually all uses. The ban on DDT was considered to be the first major victory for the environmentalist movement in the United States, and countries around the world followed America’s lead.

<exerpted>

 

Balance at link.....

doc
"Study the past if you wish to define the future"

Confucius

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: The Deadly War Against DDT
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2010, 12:36:04 PM »
The classic example of environmentalists using junk science that results in the death of millions with no benefit to the environment.

Offline cavegal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
  • Reputation: +105/-42
Re: The Deadly War Against DDT
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2010, 12:54:01 PM »
The classic example of environmentalists using junk science that results in the death of millions with no benefit to the environment.
:banghead: Just ask anyone who has had to deal with red ants...
« Last Edit: September 15, 2010, 12:57:00 PM by cavegal »


“Look, we’re led by a man that either is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind,”  Donald J.Trump. 6/13/16

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12281
  • Reputation: +1239/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: The Deadly War Against DDT
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2010, 01:35:56 PM »
It's no different than the gun control debate.

Sure, if you could completely ban guns you could save 30,000 from gun deaths but you would condemn the 2,000,000 who have used a gun to defend themselves.

The libs love to look at the first figure and ignore the second.

In the pesticide debate they do the same thing.  They look at the numbers 'killed' by the 'nasty' chemical and ignore the lives saved.

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen