Pro-Amnesty Activist Joins Obama White House Staff

[thundley4]

(CNSNews.com) – An 18-year veteran of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), who advocated for federal legislation to give the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States a path to citizenship, has been tapped for President-elect Barack Obama’s White House staff.
 
Cecilia Muñoz, who currently serves as senior vice president for the office of research, advocacy and legislation at the NCLR, will serve as director for intergovernmental affairs in the Obama administration.
 
“We’re continuing to build a White House team that can rise to the challenges facing this country,” Obama said when he announced the appointment of Muñoz and Jonathan Favreau as director of speechwriting last week.

CNSN

We all knew that the Messiah is racist at his core.

[Atomic Lib Smasher]

CNSN

We all knew that the Messiah is racist at his core.

Or a ****in' idiot. What does Obama plan to do with 12 million illegals and more wanting in? Have this doofus from LaRaza fix it? God, it's like asking Micheal Moore for weight loss help.

[Odin's Hand]

She is big buddies with UT-Arlington professor Jose Angel Gutierrez I believe.

[thundley4]

She is big buddies with UT-Arlington professor Jose Angel Gutierrez I believe.

That nut sounds like he could be best buds with Ward Churchill.

[TheSarge]

Or a ******' idiot. What does Obama plan to do with 12 million illegals and more wanting in? Have this doofus from LaRaza fix it? God, it's like asking Micheal Moore for weight loss help.

Register them as Democrat Party voters when he gives them blanket amnesty and automatic citizenship.

[formerlurker]

I am so glad all those "real conservatives" stayed home and voted Obama in.   

Thanks!! 

[Chris_]

I am so glad all those "real conservatives" stayed home and voted Obama in.   

Thanks!! 

Whatever Lurker.  Tell it to the hand.

Nobody's votes can be taken for granted - not conservative, "moderate", liberal or "other".

McLame got only as much as he got because he was a limp dick that stabbed the Republican rank and file in the back any chance he got.  If he didn't convince enough people to hold their noses and pull the lever for him, perhaps your time might be more productively used asking the "maverick" what the **** made him think the republicans he'd sold out time and time again would just "forgive and forget" all that shit...

[NHSparky]

For every "moderate" that Obama puts in and the press trumpets, a dozen moonbats like her are slipping in the backdoor. 

Rest well, people.

[formerlurker]

Whatever Lurker.  Tell it to the hand.

Nobody's votes can be taken for granted - not conservative, "moderate", liberal or "other".

McLame got only as much as he got because he was a limp dick that stabbed the Republican rank and file in the back any chance he got.  If he didn't convince enough people to hold their noses and pull the lever for him, perhaps your time might be more productively used asking the "maverick" what the **** made him think the republicans he'd sold out time and time again would just "forgive and forget" all that shit...

    <------  that's a liberal/libertarian trait you know.   

[Chris_]

   <------  that's a liberal/libertarian trait you know.   

Except for one thing Lurker.  I'm not the one crying about the results of this election.  You are the one I hear bitching loudest and longest about it.

Dear Leader is a Marxist and always has been.  McLame is and has been for the majority of his career in the Congress, a moderate/liberal Democrat in Republican's clothing, with big government socialist leanings.  These facts were known WAAAAAY back when and did not come as any kind of shock to me.  I was pleasently surprised when he picked Sarah to shore up his credibility with conservatives - make no mistake, that was exactly what picking her was about - but again, wasn't surprised when he refused to let her off the damned leash, and kept sending liberal signals in spite of her on the ticket.

None of this was unpredictable or unexpected.  It was also my considered opinion WAAAAAAAAAAY back in March when McLame got himself nominated that this wasn't going to end good for America and her Constitution, no matter which of the three liberals won in November.  So I resigned myself to doing what I could do: hunkering down, laying up a store against the hard times to come - you can't possibly tell me that things would be going any easier with Big Government McCain at the helm - and batten the hatches against the coming storm. 

If you don't want to watch Marxist Democrats take the Oval Office, don't nominate RINOs.  It's that simple.

[Zeus]

Not to hijack the tread.

McCain was to liberal for you but Snobama isn't ?

I can relate to some folks dissatisfaction with McCain . What I don't understand is so n so is to liberal for me so I'll let the more liberal candidate win,that'll learn em attitude.

Personally I think it's folks not understanding the situation and just talking out their ass.

[Tantal]

I was pleasently surprised when he picked Sarah to shore up his credibility with conservatives - make no mistake, that was exactly what picking her was about - but again, wasn't surprised when he refused to let her off the damned leash, and kept sending liberal signals in spite of her on the ticket.

I hate to admit it, but I voted for McCain on the outside chance that his heart would explode 10 minutes after being sworn-in, thus allowing Sarah to be President. Does that make me a bad person?

[formerlurker]

Except for one thing Lurker.  I'm not the one crying about the results of this election.  You are the one I hear bitching loudest and longest about it.

Dear Leader is a Marxist and always has been.  McLame is and has been for the majority of his career in the Congress, a moderate/liberal Democrat in Republican's clothing, with big government socialist leanings.  These facts were known WAAAAAY back when and did not come as any kind of shock to me.  I was pleasently surprised when he picked Sarah to shore up his credibility with conservatives - make no mistake, that was exactly what picking her was about - but again, wasn't surprised when he refused to let her off the damned leash, and kept sending liberal signals in spite of her on the ticket.

None of this was unpredictable or unexpected.  It was also my considered opinion WAAAAAAAAAAY back in March when McLame got himself nominated that this wasn't going to end good for America and her Constitution, no matter which of the three liberals won in November.  So I resigned myself to doing what I could do: hunkering down, laying up a store against the hard times to come - you can't possibly tell me that things would be going any easier with Big Government McCain at the helm - and batten the hatches against the coming storm. 

If you don't want to watch Marxist Democrats take the Oval Office, don't nominate RINOs.  It's that simple.

I am not bitching about it, just sending a friendly reminder as to why we find ourselves with a socialist as president.     You pounced on it cause it hits a nerve.  

[Chris_]

I hate to admit it, but I voted for McCain on the outside chance that his heart would explode 10 minutes after being sworn-in, thus allowing Sarah to be President. Does that make me a bad person?

You and me both.  I really didn't see him filling a full term in office, no matter who the XO-in-Chief was.

I think that makes us conservatives.  Apparently that's a bad thing in and of itself, in some people's eyes.

[formerlurker]

You and me both.  I really didn't see him filling a full term in office, no matter who the XO-in-Chief was.

I think that makes us conservatives.  Apparently that's a bad thing in and of itself, in some people's eyes.

So you voted for McCain now?   

[Chris_]

Not to hijack the tread.

McCain was to liberal for you but Snobama isn't ?

I can relate to some folks dissatisfaction with McCain . What I don't understand is so n so is to liberal for me so I'll let the more liberal candidate win,that'll learn em attitude.

Personally I think it's folks not understanding the situation and just talking out their ass.

All three of the finalists (McLame, Her Thighness, and The One) are/were liberals.  The latter two are card carrying Progressives/Marxists, while McCain was a "me too" Republican right out of the bad old days of the New Deal.  Why on earth would moderates and "undecideds" - which can be argued to be nothing more than Democrats uncomfortable with being labeled "liberal" - vote for the Faux Progressive when they had a real one to vote for?

That's the faulty calculus that cost the Republican this election.

[Chris_]

So you voted for McCain now?   

I've been telling you for a month now that I voted for McCain, lurker.

BS! for not paying attention.

[formerlurker]

I've been telling you for a month now that I voted for McCain, lurker.

BS! for not paying attention.

Never saw it, and why on earth do you care if I call out the politically immature who stayed home to cast their votes for the Messiah, and throw away more seats in Congress? 

[Chris_]

Never saw it, and why on earth do you care if I call out the politically immature who stayed home to cast their votes for the Messiah, and throw away more seats in Congress? 

I care, because if Sarah hadn't been on the ticket, I'd have BEEN one of those "politically immature" as you call us. 

Without Sarah on the ticket, and the calculus in my head that McCain was extremely unlikely to survive his full term and thus thrusting her into the center seat firmly in my head, I very likely would have voted Bob Barr this time around - in spite of the fact that I'm an elected precinct committee man for the REPUBLICAN Party.  I understand exactly why the "politically immature" made the choices they did, and I don't blame anybody but the milk toast Republican party and the RINO McCain for not securing their votes.

[formerlurker]

I care, because if Sarah hadn't been on the ticket, I'd have BEEN one of those "politically immature" as you call us. 

Without Sarah on the ticket, and the calculus in my head that McCain was extremely unlikely to survive his full term and thus thrusting her into the center seat firmly in my head, I very likely would have voted Bob Barr this time around - in spite of the fact that I'm an elected precinct committee man for the REPUBLICAN Party.  I understand exactly why the "politically immature" made the choices they did, and I don't blame anybody but the milk toast Republican party and the RINO McCain for not securing their votes.

 

http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,17008.0.html

Show me where you claimed to have voted for McCain? 

[Zeus]

All three of the finalists (McLame, Her Thighness, and The One) are/were liberals.  The latter two are card carrying Progressives/Marxists, while McCain was a "me too" Republican right out of the bad old days of the New Deal.  Why on earth would moderates and "undecideds" - which can be argued to be nothing more than Democrats uncomfortable with being labeled "liberal" - vote for the Faux Progressive when they had a real one to vote for?

That's the faulty calculus that cost the Republican this election.

Ah I get it now, McCainn wasn't conservative enough to get the moderates and "undecideds" - which can be argued to be nothing more than Democrats uncomfortable with being labeled "liberal" - vote .

It all makes sense now 

[USA4ME]

Nobody's votes can be taken for granted - not conservative, "moderate", liberal or "other".

McLame got only as much as he got because he was a limp dick that stabbed the Republican rank and file in the back any chance he got.  If he didn't convince enough people to hold their noses and pull the lever for him, perhaps your time might be more productively used asking the "maverick" what the **** made him think the republicans he'd sold out time and time again would just "forgive and forget" all that shit...

I completely agree.  The vote I cast for McCain was a vote against Il Duce.  No way to win an election when there were a lot of others who did exactly that.

More on topic, it's funny how the libs continually say they believe we should learn from history, but it fails to be played out in action when one takes into account that one of the main reasons the Roman Empire fell was their loose immigration policies.  Will it be any different with the USA?  Nope.  Do you see the libs learning from history and demanding we close the borders?  Nope.  Once again, they're all talk.

.

[Zeus]

I completely agree.  The vote I cast for McCain was a vote against Il Duce.  No way to win an election when there were a lot of others who did exactly that.

More on topic, it's funny how the libs continually say they believe we should learn from history, but it fails to be played out in action when one takes into account that one of the main reasons the Roman Empire fell was their loose immigration policies.  Will it be any different with the USA?  Nope.  Do you see the libs learning from history and demanding we close the borders?  Nope.  Once again, they're all talk.

.

I think they seriously believe the Ideology didn't fail. The wrong people tried it.

[miskie]

I say we let the Mexicans in once we annex their whole country. It would solve so many problems, and as an added bonus, give us a much smaller border to the south to defend.

If Mexico refuses to let us have the entire country, then the answer to illegal immigration should be no.