Always these little gems at DU.

[soleil]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8691183

Crotchdroppings? Sick asshole.

Locked as a "group" bashing. No it isn't bashing a group. It is just flat out disgusting.

[chitownchica]

Good find Mrs. Sunshine.
Normally I think Odin2005 is a punk, but he hit the nail on the head here:

Odin2005  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-04-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hate the "Childfree Movement" creeps exactly because they use terms like "crotchdroppings".

[Ballygrl]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8691183

Crotchdroppings? Sick asshole.

Locked as a "group" bashing. No it isn't bashing a group. It is just flat out disgusting.

WOW!

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

So what does the OP consider himself?

[AllosaursRus]

So what does the OP consider himself?

uh.......dog droppings? At least that's what I consider him/her/it.........

[Carl]

Jeez,any holiday that should make a person happy just causes so much bile and ugliness from the primitives.

It must suck to live that life.

[franksolich]

Jeez,any holiday that should make a person happy just causes so much bile and ugliness from the primitives.

It must suck to live that life.

The primitives are at their best at being their worst at Christmas though, remember.

[dandi]

RB TexLa again. He's a walking bundle of antisocial behaviors, that one.

[diesel driver]

At least, from what I could gather from reading their drek, is that most of them haven't had or chose not to have children....

Proof positive that there IS a GOD!

[franksolich]

At least, from what I could gather from reading their drek, is that most of them haven't had or chose not to have children....

Proof positive that there IS a GOD!

The primitives use the argument that they're against children because it increases the population and lessens the resources available to each person.

Well, that's not true, but even if it were true, the primitives would still be lying about their againstness.

Primitives try to cloak base motives behind a facade of "principle."

The primitives are really anti-children because children take resources--time, attention, money, energy--that the primitives think should be spent on them.  This is true in both the personal (individual family) sense, and in the collective sense.

Primitives want everything, want it all; they don't want anybody else to have anything.

[TheSarge]

At least, from what I could gather from reading their drek, is that most of them haven't had or chose not to have children....

Proof positive that there IS a GOD!

Those idiots refer to people that have kids as "breeders".

[BEG]

madmax   (1000+ posts)           Sun Jul-04-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've reproduced
   
Once, and if I had it to do over again, I'd raise Yorkshire Terriers instead. 

Nice.....

[soleil]

The primitives use the argument that they're against children because it increases the population and lessens the resources available to each person.

Well, that's not true, but even if it were true, the primitives would still be lying about their againstness.

Primitives try to cloak base motives behind a facade of "principle."

The primitives are really anti-children because children take resources--time, attention, money, energy--that the primitives think should be spent on them.  This is true in both the personal (individual family) sense, and in the collective sense.

Primitives want everything, want it all; they don't want anybody else to have anything.

Nobody wants to procreate with these assholes. That is the real truth.

[Revolution]

I've NEVER in my life heard that term used for children. Anyone who would do so is dirt beneath my feet.

miscsoc  Donating Member  (914 posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Sun Jul-04-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. second one sort of makes sense
   
hell i don't want kids - make a terrible father - but i appreciate other people having them. Someone's going to have to pay for my social services.

Never fails. At least one or two tend to make a thread not about them...ABOUT THEM!

Nice.....

  I think America owes this primitive a gigantic "thank you" for not being interested in sex. Maybe the World.

[miskie]

Wow - thats hateful.. 'crotchdroppings'

Well, you know what primitives ? - Humanity thanks you for removing yourselves from the gene pool, and Darwin smiles down from the afterlife, as he says to God - "See, I can be right about evolution too !", then they laugh and clink their beer steins together.

[DumbAss Tanker]

At least, from what I could gather from reading their drek, is that most of them haven't had or chose not to have children....

Proof positive that there IS a GOD!

Probably has more to do with blindness being relatively rare in our society these days, than it does religion.

[JohnnyReb]

What we need is.........more chlorine in the gene pool.

[diesel driver]

The primitives use the argument that they're against children because it increases the population and lessens the resources available to each person.

Well, that's not true, but even if it were true, the primitives would still be lying about their againstness.

Primitives try to cloak base motives behind a facade of "principle."

The primitives are really anti-children because children take resources--time, attention, money, energy--that the primitives think should be spent on them.  This is true in both the personal (individual family) sense, and in the collective sense.

Primitives want everything, want it all; they don't want anybody else to have anything.

In other words, primitives ARE children themselves, and don't want to compete for "mommy or daddy's" attention   (Government payouts)....

I think you are quite right, Frank.  After attending numerous family functions over the 4th, I see a very scary similarity to DUmmie postings, and squabbling 6 year-olds....