Unbelievable, but women could actually put Moore in office

[fatboy]

Tue Dec 5, 2017, 09:37 AM
FM123 (1,353 posts)

Unbelievable, but women could actually put Moore in office
 
 (CNN)If Republican Roy Moore wins next week's Senate special election in Alabama, it will be largely because of his support among women.

More specifically, Moore's ability to survive the allegations of sexually pursuing young girls, which have rocked his campaign, will likely turn on whether he can maintain his pre-scandal advantage among white women without a college education -- even as their college-educated counterparts have moved toward Democrat Doug Jones in much bigger numbers than usual for deeply conservative Alabama, according to public and private polling in the race. Read more.....
[link:http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/05/politics/white-women-class-divide-gender-divide/index.html

DUmmy FM123 is not a believer.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029928203

Response to jrthin (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 5, 2017, 10:13 AM

WhiskeyGrinder (1,492 posts)

5. White women.

The root of all evil. Voting against their own interests.   

Response to FM123 (Original post)

Tue Dec 5, 2017, 10:11 AM

Proud Liberal Dem (16,207 posts)

3. Something is seriously wrong <--- with democrats!

if people- regardless of gender or where they live- seriously think that it's better for them to elect a child molester to the US Senate over a Democrat

We can thus conclude that the democrat candidate is worse than a child molester.

[thundley4]

if people- regardless of gender or where they live- seriously think that it's better for them to elect a(n) alleged child molester to the US Senate over a Democrat that supports killing babies and open borders with amnesty for illegal immigrants.

FIFY

[Old n Grumpy]

Response to jrthin (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 5, 2017, 10:13 AM

WhiskeyGrinder (1,492 posts)

5. White women.

Those ugly, racist, sexist, homophobic women are at it again.

[Undies]

How come it is it doesn't matter how vile and repulsive a democrat is because a democrat is always better than a Republican no matter what, but Republicans are not allowed to think the same way about their candidates?

I mean, if the only bar is ideology, what is the difference in the behavior of the voters?  I mean, Bill Clinton? Really??  Bill Clinton's wife?  Really?

[SVPete]

DU-morons should try to envision this scenario: many AL women believe the accusations are false, an attempt at a  "Special Election October Surprise"; those many AL women are so POed at false accusations as a political weapon that they are voting for Moore as a rejection of the false accusations.

I know the scenario is beyond DU-morons ability to visualize, but their connection to reality is tenuous on their best days.

[Texacon]

My God they love the phrase ‘college educated’, like it has some significance. I’ll bet better than 75% of them don’t have a degree.

I don’t have a degree and I’d put my cognitive skills up against any of theirs any day.

KC

[diesel driver]

My God they love the phrase ‘college educated’, like it has some significance. I’ll bet better than 75% of them don’t have a degree.

I don’t have a degree and I’d put my cognitive skills up against any of theirs any day.

KC

Tex, I firmly believe the reason you still HAVE cognitive skills is because you don't have a degree...

We haven't had the ability to think "educated" out of us by attending some college...

[USA4ME]

Proud Liberal Dem

3. Something is seriously wrong if people- regardless of gender or where they live- seriously think that it's better for them to elect a child molester to the US Senate over a Democrat.

Once again, the primitives look at this incorrectly.

Setting aside the truth or not of the "child molester" accusation:  Instead of asking "How could they vote for a child molester?", they should be asking "How far off the tracks could the Democrat party ideology be that people would prefer to vote for a child molester?"

.