Very glad to see this, as I cannot stand Hillary and Edwards never had much of a chance. What a smackdown for Queen I'm Entitled to the Presidency, Damnit! herself. Now if he can just keep this up and win the nomination!!!!!!!!!!!
And you'd be really surprised at how many of us Dems do NOT want Hillary as the nominee and didn't even want her to run. Not that it makes much difference what hubby and I think, since our primary isn't until June 3, the very last one in the country.
I dunno.
I still think Messalina Agrippina's the one, and you're stuck with her; you'll be singing her praises in circa two months.
Actually, as a conservative Republican, while there's 298,576,689 other Americans I'd sooner see as president, Messalina Agrippina's the Democrat most stomachable to me.
Don't count her out; South Carolina is a small state with a substantial proportion of the population there imagining Barack Hussein Obama is "one of them," when he's one of them about as much as I am.
I love this year; I'm tired of someone getting the nomination (either Republican or Democrat) all "tied up" before the convention.
Of course, we have George McGovern of South Dakota to blame for that; he announced his candidacy in early 1971, for the 1972 Democrat nomination, which was at the time scandalously early. And it's been that way ever since then.
There's been no drama, no excitement, no last-minute deals, surrounding any Democrat candidate since 1960, and any Republican candidate since 1968 (i.e., the party convention started where someone did not already have the necessary votes all in place).
It'd be good for America if we got back to that.