There are lies, damned lies and then there are liberals

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

tabatha  (1000+ posts)      Thu Oct-14-10 04:17 PM
Original message
Obama admin reducing deficit
 Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 04:17 PM by tabatha
Why don't the dems make an ad about this???


http://www.flickr.com/photos/speakerpelosi/5081452634/s... /

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9316214

Where's TARP?

Where's the home foreclosure relief fund?

Where's the rest of the bail-outs, especially those to union thugs?

Where's the stimulus?

Why is a tax cut called an expense?

Can you prove ObamaCoup won't run over budget?

How does a student aid bill save money when the government assumes what was once a private transaction?

How will Cap-n-Tax save tax revenue when private incomes have to absorb hundreds if not thousands of dollars in new expenses?

How does Wall St reform reduce the deficit?

[true_blood]

Where's TARP?

Where's the home foreclosure relief fund?

Where's the rest of the bail-outs, especially those to union thugs?

Where's the stimulus?

Why is a tax cut called an expense?

Can you prove ObamaCoup won't run over budget?

How does a student aid bill save money when the government assumes what was once a private transaction?

How will Cap-n-Tax save tax revenue when private incomes have to absorb hundreds if not thousands of dollars in new expenses?

How does Wall St reform reduce the deficit?

BINGO! Game Over!

[AllosaursRus]

I'd sure like for one of these DUmbasses to explain to me how their HealthCare Bill is shrinking the deficit!!!!

What a bunch of absolute utter BS!!!!!!! The only places on the planet where anyone believes this shit is in Pelosi's office and the DUmp!

If they're so damned good, why is it O'Bumbler has expanded the deficit more than all the presidents before him put together?

Answer that one DUmb****!

Gawd these people are stooooopid!!!!!!!!

[Karin]

There are 5 replies to this OP, one of which is tabatha's, and she's confused about her own graph.  Very confused.  Don't go read it, you will leak brain cells. 

[AllosaursRus]

There are 5 replies to this OP, one of which is tabatha's, and she's confused about her own graph.  Very confused.  Don't go read it, you will leak brain cells. 

I know whatcha mean! It's one of those threads that sane people should avoid like the plague!

[jukin]

So the big three in the Bush era adds up to $2,095 billion.  However, federal deficits 2001-2008 add up to $1,750 billion.

The big three under Obama add up to $155 billion.  However the federal deficit 2009-2010 is $2,950 billion.

1+1=POTATO

[AllosaursRus]

So the big three in the Bush era adds up to $2,095 billion.  However, federal deficits 2001-2008 add up to $1,750 billion.

The big three under Obama add up to $155 billion.  However the federal deficit 2009-2010 is $2,950 billion.

1+1=POTATO

Now you ought to know better than to confuse DUmmies with facts! Their primitive minds can't grasp reality!

[DumbAss Tanker]

Where's TARP?

Where's the home foreclosure relief fund?

Where's the rest of the bail-outs, especially those to union thugs?

Where's the stimulus?

Why is a tax cut called an expense?

Can you prove ObamaCoup won't run over budget?

How does a student aid bill save money when the government assumes what was once a private transaction?

How will Cap-n-Tax save tax revenue when private incomes have to absorb hundreds if not thousands of dollars in new expenses?

How does Wall St reform reduce the deficit?

The chart was constructed using Magickal Accounting Troll logic, and by Democrats to boot, which means it bears no detectable resemblance to real economics at all.

[diesel driver]

The chart was constructed using Magickal Accounting Troll logic, and by Democrats to boot, which means it bears no detectable resemblance to real economics at all.

Or the real world, for that matter.   

[BlueStateSaint]

The chart was constructed using Magickal Accounting Troll logic, and by Democrats to boot, which means it bears no detectable resemblance to real economics at all.

You need to use a liberal dose of angel magic pixie dust to be able to read it.

[zeitgeist]

You need to use a liberal dose of angel magic pixie dust to be able to read it.

I think you were right with the Angel Dust, aka horse tranquilizer.   The more comatose the better.


I will never forget an accounting teacher's comment on government (fund) accounting, Fun Accounting, not fund accounting as he called it.  His point was that unlike real accounting where everything has to balance to the penny, with "fun accounting" you just move assets and liabilities from fund to fund until you get the balance you want.  Got a deficit in that account?  No problem just move money from another and another and another until the problem magically disappears.  Then all that is necessary is to lather, rinse and repeat, before long the paper trail is so convoluted that no one can hope to follow it.

[JohnnyReb]

How can the federal government be broke and in debt? They still have blank checks left in their check book.[DU/mode]

[AllosaursRus]

How can the federal government be broke and in debt? They still have blank checks left in their check book.[DU/mode]

It's pretty easy since they have no money! So basically, every thing they do, is in the red! They use the pyramid scheme of the IRS! Only difference is, they write the laws so cannot be held accountable!

[true_blood]

DUmmies and liberals have ZERO financial sense. Absolutely ZERO common sense as well.

[BlueStateSaint]

DUmmies and liberals have ZERO financial sense. Absolutely ZERO common sense as well.

The least common thing in the world is common sense.

[diesel driver]

I CONSTANTLY hear about how much the Reagan or the Bush tax cuts "caused the deficit", or how much in "revenue" they cost the government, "having to pay for tax cuts," etc., etc.

If this was true, then show me where the revenue to the FedGov ACTUALLY decreased. 

Revenue under Reagan almost DOUBLED in 8 years.

Deficit predictions were constantly being revised downward under Bush 43, in spite of runaway spending.

 

I'm no accounting wizard, but I do understand "cause and effect".  Tax cuts=more revenue.  More spending=more deficit.

It's not that hard, unless you're a DUmmie.