Author Topic: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus  (Read 1297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6195
  • Reputation: +391/-44
Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« on: November 05, 2010, 03:34:11 PM »
I am taking this from FR because it is the easiest way to do it<


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2622270/posts

Quote

Senate Members 2010 Election Results

•Hon. Roland Burris (IL) NOT RUNNING (replaced by a Republican)

•Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT) Next Election (2012) •Hon. Tom Udall (NM) Next Election (2014) House Members

1.REHIRED – Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)

2.REHIRED – Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)

3.REHIRED – Hon. Earl Blumenauer (OR-03)

4.REHIRED – Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01) (Unopposed)

5.REHIRED – Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)

6.REHIRED – Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08) (Unopposed)

7.REHIRED – Hon. André Carson (IN-07)

8.REHIRED – Hon. Donna Christensen (VI)

9.REHIRED – Hon. Judy Chu (CA-32)

10.REHIRED – Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)

11.REHIRED – Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)

12.REHIRED – Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)

13.REHIRED – Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)

14.REHIRED – Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)

15.REHIRED – Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)

16.REHIRED – Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)

17.REHIRED – Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)

18.REHIRED – Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)

19.REHIRED – Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)

20.REHIRED – Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)

21.REHIRED – Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)

22.REHIRED – Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)

23.REHIRED – Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)

24.REHIRED – Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)

25.FIRED – Hon. John Hall (NY-19)

26.FIRED – Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)

27.REHIRED – Hon. Alcee Hastings (FL-23)

28.REHIRED – Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)

29.REHIRED – Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)

30.REHIRED – Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)

31.REHIRED – Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)

32.REHIRED – Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)

33.REHIRED – Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

34.FIRED – Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13) (fired in the primary)

35.REHIRED – Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)

36.REHIRED – Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)


(37.REHIRED – Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
38.REHIRED – Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)

39.REHIRED – Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)

40.REHIRED – Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)

41.REHIRED – Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07) (Unopposed)

42.REHIRED – Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)

43.REHIRED – Hon. George Miller (CA-07)

44.REHIRED – Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)

45.REHIRED – Hon. Jim Moran (VA-08)

46.REHIRED – Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)

47.REHIRED – Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC)

48.REHIRED – Hon. John Olver (MA-01)

49.REHIRED – Hon. Frank Pallone (NJ-06)

50.REHIRED – Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)

51.REHIRED – Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)

52.REHIRED – Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)

53.REHIRED – Hon. Jared Polis (CO-02)

54.REHIRED – Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)

55.REHIRED – Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)

56.REHIRED – Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)

57.REHIRED – Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)

58.REHIRED – Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-39)

59.REHIRED – Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)

60.REHIRED – Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)

61.REHIRED – Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)

62.REHIRED – Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)

63.REHIRED – Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)

64.REHIRED – Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)

65.REHIRED – Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12) (Unopposed)

66.REHIRED – Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)

67.REHIRED – Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)

68.REHIRED – Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)

69.REHIRED – Hon. Peter Welch (VT-)



Has anyone posted the dimocrat Senators up for re-election in '12.  I only know one of Sparky's  friends Snowball is up but I think there is a thread over there on that too.

ETA:
Man that vicodin is good stuff I missed a u in Caucus
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 03:41:13 PM by zeitgeist »
< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2010, 07:33:12 PM »
That's all we need the most liberal of democrats to be rehired. :hammer:
(What's the vicodin for?)

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6195
  • Reputation: +391/-44
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2010, 10:54:25 AM »
That's all we need the most liberal of democrats to be rehired. :hammer:
(What's the vicodin for?)

Had some major oral surgery.  After I took it,  I began to itch, I have the same reaction to percocet.  I am not sure which is worse the pain or the itch.  I will have to up date my records.  Never had Vicodin before don't want it ever again.  Feel a lot better today but still look like I went ten rounds with a heavy weight. :argh:

I am amazed at how few people know or care about the history of "Progesssive" democrats.  Scary when you really think about it.  The truly are the determined ten percent working from within whom my mother use to talk about (rail might be a better word)   

The left managed to marginalize ( admittedly with his own help ) Joe Mc Carthy but they never disproved what he was saying. In fact much of it was verified with the break up of the Soviet Union. Now no one dares go there again.  Wouldn't be prudent to call them what they are even though it is true.  All the while the socialists march on in the House and Senate giving a big horse laugh to We, the people.

Bread and circus keep We, the people entertained while they march on. 
 
< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2010, 11:10:48 AM »
Had some major oral surgery.  After I took it,  I began to itch, I have the same reaction to percocet.  I am not sure which is worse the pain or the itch.  I will have to up date my records.  Never had Vicodin before don't want it ever again.  Feel a lot better today but still look like I went ten rounds with a heavy weight. :argh:

I am amazed at how few people know or care about the history of "Progesssive" democrats.  Scary when you really think about it.  The truly are the determined ten percent working from within whom my mother use to talk about (rail might be a better word)   

The left managed to marginalize ( admittedly with his own help ) Joe Mc Carthy but they never disproved what he was saying. In fact much of it was verified with the break up of the Soviet Union. Now no one dares go there again.  Wouldn't be prudent to call them what they are even though it is true.  All the while the socialists march on in the House and Senate giving a big horse laugh to We, the people.

Bread and circus keep We, the people entertained while they march on. 
 

"The Verona Intercepts"...I think I have that right...yeah, he was right.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6195
  • Reputation: +391/-44
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2010, 12:25:19 PM »
"The Verona Intercepts"...I think I have that right...yeah, he was right.
Roger that JR.

One of the reasons libs ( or what ever they want to be called these days ) have such a vehement hater or Ann Coulter is because of her book "Treason"

Quote
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=219

MCCARTHYISM: THE ROSETTA STONE OF LIBERAL LIES
November 7, 2007


When I wrote a ferocious defense of Sen. Joe McCarthy in Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism , liberals chose not to argue with me. Instead they posted a scrolling series of reasons not to read my book, such as that I wear short skirts, date boys, and that "Treason" was not a scholarly tome.

After printing rabidly venomous accounts of McCarthy for half a century based on zero research, liberals would only accept research presenting an alternative view of McCarthy that included, as the Los Angeles Times put it, at least the "pretense of scholarly throat-clearing and objectivity."

This week, they got it. The great M. Stanton Evans has finally released Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies . Based on a lifetime's work, including nearly a decade of thoroughgoing research, stores of original documents and never-before-seen government files, this 672-page book ends the argument on Joe McCarthy. Look for it hidden behind stacks of Bill Clinton's latest self-serving book at a bookstore near you.

Evans' book is such a tour de force that liberals are already preparing a "yesterday's news" defense -- as if they had long ago admitted the truth about McCarthy. Yes, and they fought shoulder to shoulder with Ronald Reagan to bring down the Evil Empire. Thus, Publishers Weekly preposterously claims that "the history Evans relates is already largely known, if not fully accepted." Somebody better tell George Clooney.

The McCarthy period is the Rosetta stone of all liberal lies. It is the textbook on how they rewrite history -- the sound chamber of liberal denunciations, their phony victimhood as they demean and oppress their enemies, their false imputation of dishonesty to their opponents, their legalization of every policy dispute, their ability to engage in lock-step shouting campaigns, and the black motives concealed by their endless cacophony.

The true story of Joe McCarthy, told in meticulous, irrefutable detail in "Blacklisted by History," is that from 1938 to 1946, the Democratic Party acquiesced in a monstrous conspiracy being run through the State Department, the military establishment, and even the White House to advance the Soviet cause within the U.S. government.

In the face of the Democrats' absolute refusal to admit to their fecklessness, fatuity and recklessness in allowing known Soviet spies to penetrate the deepest levels of government, McCarthy demanded an accounting.

Even if one concedes to on-the-one-hand-on-the-other-hand whiners like Ronald Radosh that Truman's Secretary of State Dean Acheson didn't like communism, his record is what it was. And that record was to treat Soviet spies like members of the Hasty Pudding Club.

Rather than own up to their moral blindness to Soviet espionage, Democrats fired up the liberal slander machine, which would be deployed again and again over the next half century to the present day. In hiding their own perfidy, liberals were guilty of every sin they lyingly imputed to McCarthy. There were no "McCarthyites" until liberals came along.

Blacklisted by History proves that every conventional belief about McCarthy is wrong, including:

-- That he lied about his war service: He was a tailgunner in World War II;
-- That he was a drunk: He would generally nurse a single drink all night;
-- That he made the whole thing up: He produced loads of Soviet spies in government jobs;
-- That he just did it for political gain: He understood perfectly the godless evil of communism.

Ironically, for all of their love of conspiracy theories -- the rigging of the 2000 election, vote suppression in Ohio in 2004, 9/11 being an inside job, oil companies covering up miracle technology that would allow cars to run on dirt, Britney Spears' career, etc., etc. -- when presented with an actual conspiracy of Soviet spies infiltrating the U.S. government, they laughed it off like world-weary skeptics and dedicated themselves to slandering Joe McCarthy.

Then as now, liberals protect themselves from detection with wild calumnies against anybody who opposes them. They have no interest in -- or aptitude for -- persuasion. Their goal is to anathematize their enemies. Blacklisted by History removes the curse from one of the greatest patriots in American history.

COPYRIGHT 2007 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111






Again what is scary is how long this has been going on and how effective the left has been in marginalizing all opposition as "Krazy Klan" "Birtchers" "McCarthyites" "Right Wing Goldwater supporters" "Fundamentalist"
"Birther" "Teabagger"  ad nausea and yet they recoil at being called by their rightful name "democratic Socialists".   And what is the ultimate goal of socialism?   

< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2010, 02:49:20 PM »
The left managed to marginalize ( admittedly with his own help ) Joe Mc Carthy but they never disproved what he was saying. In fact much of it was verified with the break up of the Soviet Union. Now no one dares go there again.  Wouldn't be prudent to call them what they are even though it is true.  All the while the socialists march on in the House and Senate giving a big horse laugh to We, the people.
How very true. Progressive is just a code word for communist.
I hope you feel better soon. :cheersmate:

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1278/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2010, 10:13:49 PM »
Trust me, zeit, few if any of those people are going anywhere.  I dare say that if Hodes and Che could have counted on getting reelected with 70-plus percent of the vote every two years, they'd have been card carrying members as well.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6195
  • Reputation: +391/-44
Re: Democat Progressive (socialist)Caucus
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2010, 06:50:35 AM »
Trust me, zeit, few if any of those people are going anywhere.  I dare say that if Hodes and Che could have counted on getting reelected with 70-plus percent of the vote every two years, they'd have been card carrying members as well.

I was reading a thread on redistricting the other night at the dump which was kind of funny.  Hardly worth bringing over but loaded with irony.  Dummies think that it is ok when their side does it but shamefully wrong when the other side does.  That, and they simply don't understand the process.  What is surprising is how close a race Mass CD4 became ( Bun& Frank's Gerrymandered District ).

With luck Hodes and Porter will become a footnote in the annals of NH history.  Carol, in four years, managed to introduce 41 bills of which ZERO got out of committee.  She is now stuck with that record. 

In terms of this state's redistricting at the local level, Newington needs to get out from under the thumb of P_town to have any representation in Concord.  They simply cannot over come the democrat machine in P_town to get a Republican elected although they vote overwhelmingly Republican.  If they are redistricted in with Stratham they might have a chance at fair representation. 

 
< watch this space for coming distractions >