There's spin and then there's DU

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

mfcorey1 (2,091 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

O'Keefe Caught In His Own Trap

NO AMOUNT OF PIMP COSTUMES CAN HIDE JAMES O'KEEFE FROM... THE LAW (BUM, BUM, BUMMMMMM) - TPM: "It was one of the few -- if not the only -- coordinated efforts to attempt in-person voter fraud, and it was pulled off by affiliates of conservative activist James O'Keefe at polling places in New Hampshire Tuesday night. All of it part of an attempt to prove the need for voter ID laws that voting rights experts say have a unfair impact on minority voters. Now election law experts tell TPM that O'Keefe's allies could face criminal charges on both the federal and state level for procuring ballots under false names, and that his undercover sting doesn't demonstrate a need for voter ID laws at all. Federal law bans not only the casting of, but the 'procurement' of ballots 'that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held.'"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002157048

Got that?

Showing on video that dem poll workers will provide fraudulant ballots proves Veritas Project was engaged in voter fraud just like the AbScam video proved the FBI was really an Arab front bribing congressmen.

I guess the next step is to find a dutiful democrat AG or federal prosecutor that answers internet petitions to prosecute this.

[franksolich]

I saw this yesterday, because at the very same time this campfire was being lit, the defrocked warped primitive, she with the face like Hindenburg's, was lighting a second one with exactly the same story.

Dowager Hindenburg said it was unimportant because vote fraudsters get caught anyway.

Yeah, sure.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Oh, they are going to be so livid!

Lawless O'Keefe and lawless lawlessry lessen the law with his voting fraud while the dead are disenfranchised!

The attorney general in New Hampshire is probing the state’s voting procedures in response to a video released Wednesday by conservative filmmaker James O’Keefe showing how easy it is to vote in the name of someone who is dead. …
 
O’Keefe told TheDC that the operation was done to bring attention to fraud since the state does not require identification to vote. Law enforcement seems to be watching.
 
“Based on the information we received on election day and the information obtained on the video, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of voting procedures with the Secretary of State’s office,” assistant New Hampshire attorney general Richard Head told TheDC by phone on Thursday.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/12/okeefe-video-prompts-probe-by-new-hampshire-attorney-general/#ixzz1jHMNd4xT

[Karin]

From the quote in the first post, my wheels got stuck here:

Now election law experts tell TPM that O'Keefe's allies could face criminal charges on both the federal and state level for procuring ballots under false names, and that his undercover sting doesn't demonstrate a need for voter ID laws at all.

How does this sentence make any sense?  The "nothing to see here" slapdash spin is attached to the second part of the sentence a little too hastily.  It's also assertion without support; and it does not follow. 

It doesn't demonstrate it, because I say so.  So shutup.