Author Topic: Court Weighs Gay Marriage  (Read 4010 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jctejas

  • Just Off Probation
  • *
  • Posts: 110
  • Reputation: +11/-49
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #25 on: March 27, 2013, 09:58:16 PM »
More important story is the libtards hating of polyamourous people and incestuous people.    Such haters.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #26 on: March 27, 2013, 10:14:30 PM »
More important story is the libtards hating of polyamourous people and incestuous people.    Such haters.

They really do hate the Mormons, yet I think polygamy is more acceptable than gay marriage.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1278/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #27 on: March 27, 2013, 10:19:27 PM »
When they realized they could get tax breaks for it.

How do you figure?  Funny, but when they used the phrase, "Marriage penalty," they weren't joking.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline Articulate Ape

  • ad hominid
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
  • Reputation: +25/-55
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #28 on: March 28, 2013, 12:05:44 AM »
Exactly....must destroy everything good and decent in our society so that socialism can thrive. "Thrive" may have been a poor choice of words there since socialism is anti-thriving for anyone and everyone but more like depriving anyone and everyone of anything.

Well said, sir.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~ Benjamin Franklin

Offline Articulate Ape

  • ad hominid
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
  • Reputation: +25/-55
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #29 on: March 28, 2013, 04:38:49 AM »
It's just an online poll, but it's kind of interesting how very lopsided it is.  Both sides had the opportunity to stack the poll so one cannot say that the results are completely with merit when considering the views of the greater population.  It would seem that a tiny but noisy group of Leftists have taken over the helm of this great nation and are steering us into the shoals.  The tail is wagging the dog, so to speak.  That dynamic needs to change soon if the America we love is to survive.

From Latina magazine' which certainly shows how Hispanics lean on this issue.

Do You Support Same-Sex Marriage?
 [Yes] it's time for change.
 [ No ] I have traditional views.

Yes, it's time for change.
8.9%
No, I have traditional views.
91.1%]


Wouldn't it be neat if the people we sent to Washington DC to do our will actually did our will?  Now that's a novel idea.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~ Benjamin Franklin

Offline Mr Mannn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14885
  • Reputation: +2646/-276
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #30 on: March 28, 2013, 08:56:45 AM »
They really do hate the Mormons, yet I think polygamy is more acceptable than gay marriage.
True. But I know for a fact that if I had 16 wives...they would all be mad at me at same time.
Mr Mann ~~ flowers x 16 = budget breaker

Offline Freeper

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #31 on: March 28, 2013, 09:13:59 AM »
How do you figure?  Funny, but when they used the phrase, "Marriage penalty," they weren't joking.

Maybe I don't understand how the tax code works but my tax burden was less as was my wife's if we filed jointly. If we filed married but separately we would have paid more.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #32 on: March 28, 2013, 12:59:11 PM »
Maybe I don't understand how the tax code works but my tax burden was less as was my wife's if we filed jointly. If we filed married but separately we would have paid more.

Same thing for us.
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #33 on: March 28, 2013, 01:09:07 PM »
The lower tax happens when a married couple only has a single income earner.

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #34 on: March 28, 2013, 01:29:31 PM »
The lower tax happens when a married couple only has a single income earner.

Is that income only wages and salaries, or does it also include dividends, social security, and pensions?
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #35 on: March 28, 2013, 01:43:26 PM »
Is that income only wages and salaries, or does it also include dividends, social security, and pensions?

Not sure, but I would think it includes all incomes. I know I'd pay more if I filed separately or as head of household than I do filing jointly, since my wife doesn't work.

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #36 on: March 28, 2013, 02:20:56 PM »
Not sure, but I would think it includes all incomes. I know I'd pay more if I filed separately or as head of household than I do filing jointly, since my wife doesn't work.

I'm retired, and my wife works.
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #37 on: March 30, 2013, 01:25:52 AM »
Quote
Elena Kagan, 2009: ‘There Is No Constitutional Right To Same-Sex Marriage’

Let’s take a stroll down memory lane.  It’s 2009, and Elena Kagan is answering questions during her confirmation hearing for the position of Solicitor General within the Obama administration. According to William Jacobson at Legal Insurrection, who posted this piece on March 25, this is what she had to say about gay marriage:
PJ Media
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Revolution

  • It's a Hoagie not a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • Reputation: +503/-426
  • 8/20/50 - 3/8/12 Love you, Pop
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #38 on: March 30, 2013, 03:02:37 AM »
How does that work? A big, bad bull-dyke saying something like that? Hypocrite, self-loather, or gigantic liar.

:usflag: :salutearmy: :saluteaf: :saluteusmc: :salutenavy: :taps:
THANK YOU for what you do!

soon as you find your manhood all else falls into place.

Quote from: Greg Gutfeld
If Ft. Hood was "workplace violence," then the Hindenburg was an air show.

Guns do not kill people. Rotting, festering, disgusting, grimy, evil, un-reparable souls kill people.

Quote
I don't know if sand glows in the dark, but we're gonna find out.

3x PROUD Facebook Felon!!

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #39 on: March 30, 2013, 10:58:35 AM »
Assuming Kagan conveniently forgets about what she's said, the tragedy is, nobody can force her to eat her words, throw her out, impeach her for having "evolved."

The dyke is fixed and permanent.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1278/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Court Weighs Gay Marriage
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2013, 09:26:24 AM »
Maybe I don't understand how the tax code works but my tax burden was less as was my wife's if we filed jointly. If we filed married but separately we would have paid more.

Right--but even if you file married/joint you'll end up getting hammered if you're a "DINK" (dual income, no kids) because you'll have to file Single-Zero and have some serious deductions, otherwise you're going to end up owing because ALL of the second income at the marginal rate for your income bracket rather than the lower rates. 

Couple that with some states (Maine and CA are two which come to mind) where your state taxes are based on your federal return.  You could in theory get hammered so hard if the spouse works part-time it's barely worth working.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford