Biden’s SCOTUS Pick Has ‘Pattern of Letting Child Porn Offenders off the Hook’

[Mr Mannn]

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2022/03/17/hawley-bidens-scotus-pick-pattern-letting-child-porn-offenders-off-hook/

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) called out President Joe Biden’s nominee for United States Supreme Court, Ketanji Brown Jackson, for having “a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes.”

In a series of tweets detailing Judge Jackson’s rulings, interviews, articles, and speeches, Hawley called attention to the “alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

Biden nominated Jackson to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer last month, fulfilling his campaign promise to nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court.

“As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders – saying it leads to ‘stigmatization and ostracism,’” Hawley tweeted. “She’s suggested public policy is driven by a ‘climate of fear, hatred & revenge’ against sex offenders.”

Hawley shared an article penned by Jackson where she wrote:

    In the current climate of fear, hatred, and revenge associated with the release of convicted sex criminals, courts must be especially attentive to legislative enactments that “use[] public health and safety rhetoric to justify procedures that are, in essence, punishment and detention.”

Hawley cited cases such as United States v. Chazin, United States v. Cooper, United States v. Downs, United States v. Sears, and United States v. Stewart as examples of her leniency towards the sentencing of child porn sex offenders.

“In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months. Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law,” Hawley tweeted.

“In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months,” he said in another tweet.

Hawley sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Democrat Senate Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said Jackson would have a “prompt” hearing.

Hawley said the U.S. Sentencing Commission has refused to provide the committee with all of Jackson’s records from her time spent there. The Missouri Senator called Jackson’s record “disturbing,” and added, “sending child predators to jail shouldn’t be controversial.”

He also called out Jackson for wondering if there is a type of “less-serious child pornography offender.” Hawley shared a transcript where Jackson said:

    And so I’m wondering whether you could say that there is a that there could be a less-serious child pornography offender who is engaging in the type of conduct in the group experience level because their motivation is the challenge, or to use the technology? They’re very sophisticated technologically, but they aren’t necessarily that interested in the child pornography piece of it?

Jackson also claims she “mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles,” in another transcript Hawley shared to Twitter. “In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders,” Hawley wrote.

Biden setting up a little insurance with the court?

[Eupher]

The short answer is "yep."

You would think that #SharterJoe's handlers would've vetted this scrunt a little more thoroughly. But then again, Joe's administration is chock full of half-assed incompetents so why would that process have been any better than anything else those morons have done?

Looks to me like Hawley is doing #SharterJoe's job for him -- which is par for the course, as Joe doesn't even know what day it is, unless he's heading back to Wilmington.

[DefiantSix]

The short answer is "yep."

You would think that #SharterJoe's handlers would've vetted this scrunt a little more thoroughly. But then again, Joe's administration is chock full of half-assed incompetents so why would that process have been any better than anything else those morons have done?

I'm becoming more and more convinced by the day that the political appointments coming out of the dementia addled pretender to the throne's regime are deliberate, and exquisitely vetted and thought out.

Consider the following:

(1) #JoeThePedophile's regime IS Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch's third term: this means that Li'l Bitch can be just as radical this time around as his Marxist little heart desires, and there's absolutely no blowback on him. It's the dementia addled white guy's fault.

(2) Make no mistake; Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch was every bit as radical as everything his history was telling us - from his schooling in a Muslim madrassa to his deep connections to the off the charts Marxist scum of the Weather Underground terrorist group - and now with the proverbial governors removed from the throttle, he has no reason to hold back. His associations have always been with groups that want to collapse the entire US republic, and these nominees and policies we've seen in the past 14 months are moves that accelerate his ability to move forward toward that goal much more aggressively than he was able to before.

Remember what we discovered during Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch's official terms: once you approach what the cock sucker is doing from the perspective that the best interests of the United States are NOT a motovation for his actions, everything he does makes sense. Same thing applies to #JoeThePretender's regime: except you can now even remove responsibility for his actions from the motivations he responds to. #SharterJoe truly is the first Muppet to ever sit his Depends behind the HMS Resolution desk.

[Eupher]

I'm becoming more and more convinced by the day that the political appointments coming out of the dementia addled pretender to the throne's regime are deliberate, and exquisitely vetted and thought out.

Consider the following:

(1) #JoeThePedophile's regime IS Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch's third term: this means that Li'l Bitch can be just as radical this time around as his Marxist little heart desires, and there's absolutely no blowback on him. It's the dementia addled white guy's fault.

(2) Make no mistake; Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch was every bit as radical as everything his history was telling us - from his schooling in a Muslim madrassa to his deep connections to the off the charts Marxist scum of the Weather Underground terrorist group - and now with the proverbial governors removed from the throttle, he has no reason to hold back. His associations have always been with groups that want to collapse the entire US republic, and these nominees and policies we've seen in the past 14 months are moves that accelerate his ability to move forward toward that goal much more aggressively than he was able to before.

Remember what we discovered during Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch's official terms: once you approach what the cock sucker is doing from the perspective that the best interests of the United States are NOT a motovation for his actions, everything he does makes sense. Same thing applies to #JoeThePretender's regime: except you can now even remove responsibility for his actions from the motivations he responds to. #SharterJoe truly is the first Muppet to ever sit his Depends behind the HMS Resolution desk.

Agree wholeheartedly about #SharterJoe being Barry's puppet and that this is Barry's 3rd term. Somebody other than Joe is calling the shots so it's got to be Barry.

There's only one problem with naming some of these nominees - especially judges - that clearly are biased and have demonstrated, through their record, how blatant their bias is. Barry has to get his nominees through the Senate, and we've seen a couple of cases where the Senate has shown thumbs down.

Just recently Cruz has released his hold on 13 State Department nominees because of their refusal to impose the congressionally-mandated sanctions against Russia vis a vis the Nordstream pipeline. Barry decided to play ball, so Cruz lifted his hold.

My point is, these nominations are not slam-dunks, though I would agree that a certain amount of vetting has to have been done. This is more a mark of the sheer arrogance of Barry and his thugs more than anything.

[Drafe Hoblin]

This is why Repubs need Roger Stone types...   Venture forth with no expectations in 'wrong crowds'.  You're going to hear something about her you can pass-along to the Right crowd.