The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: Eupher on September 01, 2021, 06:53:45 PM
-
The entire JCOS should have resigned after GropeyJoe insisted on this--assuming they objected to this BS when they heard about it.
Just after the fall of Kabul, the Taliban started turning up in U.S. uniforms, carrying U.S. rifles, and riding in U.S. vehicles. They started showing off a Black Hawk helicopter they’d captured. It soon became clear that when the Taliban overran the Afghan military, it also snapped up all of that military’s gear. It also grabbed all of the gear the U.S. military left behind at Bagram Air Base and other posts as it hastily retreated. Joe Biden insists he and his high command, including generals who wear medal clusters so enormous you could serve a pizza on them, planned for all this. But did they? Did they plan to arm the Taliban?
One question now is: Did they plan for the ongoing cover-up?
Forbes reports that the State Department is telling other federal agencies to scrub their websites of lists of weapons the U.S. provided the Afghan military over the years.
According to an admission obtained from the State Department, Biden officials recently directed federal agencies to scrub their websites of official reports detailing the $82.9 billion in military equipment and training provided to the Afghan security forces since 2001.
The scrubbed audits and reports included detailed accounting of what the U.S. had provided to Afghan forces, down to the number of night vision devices, hand grenades, Black Hawk helicopters, and armored vehicles.
Reports further quantified 208 aircraft and helicopters; 75,000 war vehicles – including 22 Humvees, 50,000 tactical vehicles and nearly 1,000 mine resistant vehicles; and 600,000 weapons – including 350,000 M4 and M16 rifles, 60,000 machine guns, and 25,000 grenade launchers.
The Biden administration claims it’s scrubbing weapons information, including some reports that are several years old, to protect those it left stranded in Afghanistan. That’s laughable.
Why haven't impeachment proceedings been started against GropeyJoe and his entire cast of thugs?
More at the link, sorry to say.
PJMedia (https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/bryan-preston/2021/09/01/billion-dollar-memory-hole-biden-admin-now-scrubbing-federal-websites-of-lists-of-weapons-it-gave-the-taliban-n1474953?utm_source=pjmedia&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=&bcid=54b311e9e985a52310aeaad8e21af0fc&recip=19794211)
-
Why haven't impeachment proceedings been started against GropeyJoe and his entire cast of thugs?
Because the triers of matters are equally complicit.
-
As much as it's deserved. I can't get excited about impeachment with heels up waiting in the on deck circle
-
As much as it's deserved. I can't get excited about impeachment with heels up waiting in the on deck circle
That was the whole point of Cameltoe Hairs; coincidently, the same reason Reggie Love's Li'l Bitch selected the utterly incompetent #JoeThePedophile as his impeachment insurance veep 13 years ago.
-
As much as it's deserved. I can't get excited about impeachment with heels up waiting in the on deck circle
Her unpopularity would paralyze the dems.
-
Someone needs to inform Gropey Joe that, much like what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, once something goes on the internet it stays on the internet.
Forever.
-
Because the triers of matters are equally complicit.
Well, inasmuch as it's pointless, apparently articles of impeachment have been filed (in the circular file, of course) against Blinken.
The question I posed was largely rhetorical. Because with Pelousy in the Speaker's chair, nothing happens anyway unless it's to further her own agenda.
-
Someone needs to inform Gropey Joe that, much like what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, once something goes on the internet it stays on the internet.
Forever.
Good one Zath ...
A 1,000 :thumbs: