TheMastersNemesis.... Say What You Will. Trump IS Their Best Candidate.

[CC27]

TheMastersNemesis (4,935 posts)

Say What You Will. Trump IS Their Best Candidate. All Others Are Horrid And Evil.


Unfortunately Trump is the best GOP candidate. Think of the consequences if ANY of the others won the White House. President Huckabee, President Walker, President Bush, et al. Give me a ****ing quart of vodka is any of these others could win. Forget global warming or any other disaster. A GOP president would be a national disaster of global proportions.

And if Trump really is the best offer, what the hell has happened to our country. And what is worse even the worst of them would get a lot votes. And the religionut churches would vote 1005 for any of them

Someone is scared of the Donald. Nice projection there DUmmie.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027136156

[Skul]

Stumping for the Trump, I see.

[Patriot Guard Rider]

Whiskeytide (1,194 posts)
2. Everyone I have talked to who...

... either supports Trump or at least finds him appealing for some reason - to a person - cites his "I don't give a shit" attitude toward the establishment and the media. They love that part of his persona.

I think he's appealing to people who are, at least subconsciously, anarchist and want to burn it all down. They see him as the best arsonist.

Let me 'splain it to you in small words and short sentences there Whiskeytide, so you can understand. NO ONE wants to burn it all down. All they want is a return to the constitution and for an out of control government, who only pays attention to the electorate whey they seek re-election, to be reined in.

[Maverick1987]

Let me 'splain it to you in small words and short sentences there Whiskeytide, so you can understand. NO ONE wants to burn it all down. All they want is a return to the constitution and for an out of control government, who only pays attention to the electorate whey they seek re-election, to be reined in.

That's just another projection on their part.  It's those f*****s that want to burn it all down. 

[BannedFromDU]

Let me 'splain it to you in small words and short sentences there Whiskeytide, so you can understand. NO ONE wants to burn it all down. All they want is a return to the constitution and for an out of control government, who only pays attention to the electorate whey they seek re-election, to be reined in.

     I think Trump is an imbecile in matters that don't relate to him acquiring more money, and I don't believe that his ability to acquire money for himself would translate to the wellbeing of the US. I DO believe that he would at least bring with him in matters relevant to the United States something we've lacked since 2009: BALLS. I also believe that Hillary is also out for Hillary and Hillary's wealth alone, so between the two I prefer Trump. While we can't build a wall, and we can't send 11 million people packing, he at least said he WANTS those things, and that's far more than Hillary has said. In fact, I don't think she's said anything at all.

     I also think that each and every DUmmy can go **** themselves.

[HawkHogan]

Let me 'splain it to you in small words and short sentences there Whiskeytide, so you can understand. NO ONE wants to burn it all down. All they want is a return to the constitution and for an out of control government, who only pays attention to the electorate whey they seek re-election, to be reined in.

Well Dummies want to burn it down hence Occupy Wall Street, BLM, etc.  They have already lost at this life, so there only solution is ruin the lives of others.

[obumazombie]

     I think Trump is an imbecile in matters that don't relate to him acquiring more money, and I don't believe that his ability to acquire money for himself would translate to the wellbeing of the US. I DO believe that he would at least bring with him in matters relevant to the United States something we've lacked since 2009: BALLS. I also believe that Hillary is also out for Hillary and Hillary's wealth alone, so between the two I prefer Trump. While we can't build a wall, and we can't send 11 million people packing, he at least said he WANTS those things, and that's far more than Hillary has said. In fact, I don't think she's said anything at all.

     I also think that each and every DUmmy can go **** themselves.

I don't accept the lib proposition that we can't build a wall, and that we can't send 11 million illegal aliens and anchor babies packing.
Just a small attrition rate of 3 to 5% per year would clear them out in less than 20 years.
By attrition I mean anything that would cause them to surface into the public arena such as a traffic stop.
Such as
No car insurance
No drivers license
Domestic abuse calls
Workers comp
Any traffic violation
Any arrest
Any use of welfare
public intoxication
Gang activity
Money laundering
Attempting to vote
Attempting to hold any public office
Vagrancy
Solicitation

If they are able to stay in the shadows, be productive and mind their own business, in my mind they are welcome to stay as long as they want.

As for the wall, China built one thousands of years ago much longer than the one proposed.
I wouldn't necessarily have any reservations about building a wall a section at a time over a reasonable number of years.

[Skul]

OZ, we'd probably outsource the wall construction to China.
Cripes, it seems everything else is built by them.

  for the fine list.

Repeal the 14th amendment. It was meant to benefit the black men, women and children.
Prior to it, they were not considered citizens, and the southern democrats used that.

[BannedFromDU]

I don't accept the lib proposition that we can't build a wall, and that we can't send 11 million illegal aliens and anchor babies packing.
Just a small attrition rate of 3 to 5% per year would clear them out in less than 20 years.
By attrition I mean anything that would cause them to surface into the public arena such as a traffic stop.
Such as
No car insurance
No drivers license
Domestic abuse calls
Workers comp
Any traffic violation
Any arrest
Any use of welfare
public intoxication
Gang activity
Money laundering
Attempting to vote
Attempting to hold any public office
Vagrancy
Solicitation

If they are able to stay in the shadows, be productive and mind their own business, in my mind they are welcome to stay as long as they want.

As for the wall, China built one thousands of years ago much longer than the one proposed.
I wouldn't necessarily have any reservations about building a wall a section at a time over a reasonable number of years.

     Under those conditions, I mostly agree.

[Ralph Wiggum]

Trump is doing a good job of guiding the topics.  I prefer Carson, Cruz or Walker in no particular order.  At least for now.

[BlueStateSaint]

Trump is doing a good job of guiding the topics.  I prefer Carson, Cruz or Walker in no particular order.  At least for now.

I'd add Fiorina to that short list.

[BattleHymn]

Bernie!  Bernie!

 

Whoops, wait, wrong site.

//switchingoffDUmolemode

[DUmpsterDiver]

What we have here is a failure to communicate ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4Bp-68W-2c

[USA4ME]

TheMastersNemesis

And the religionut churches would vote 1005 for any of them

"would vote 1005 for any of them"

1005??

Can anyone translate this "1005" gibberish into English?

.

[USA4ME]

I think Trump is an imbecile in matters that don't relate to him acquiring more money, and I don't believe that his ability to acquire money for himself would translate to the wellbeing of the US. I DO believe that he would at least bring with him in matters relevant to the United States something we've lacked since 2009: BALLS. I also believe that Hillary is also out for Hillary and Hillary's wealth alone, so between the two I prefer Trump. While we can't build a wall, and we can't send 11 million people packing, he at least said he WANTS those things, and that's far more than Hillary has said. In fact, I don't think she's said anything at all.

I agree Trump is no conservative on social matters. On economic, he's moderate at best. But at least he knows the business of the USA is business, so I'll give him that.

Way too early to know who will emerge as nominee. Personally, I think the Dems have the bigger problem exciting their voters. Between Hillary "it's my turn" Clinton, Bernie "Commie" Sanders, Martin "Who???" O'Malley, and Slow Joe if he joins, the nominee isn't going to get through without some major feelings getting hurt.
.

[DUmpsterDiver]

Well gee, what can one say but this ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvL0wALKKYE

[GOBUCKS]

Say What You Will. Trump IS Their Best Candidate.

If I were a democrat, I'd say the same thing. The Hildebeast would win at least forty states.

If you just read what he says, you'd swear Joan Rivers has come back from the dead. Classy.

Hopefully he'll go away soon, but in the meantime, what an embarrassment.

[SVPete]

When it comes to loony-tunes like TMN, I'd be inclined toward those he most feared and loathed:

All Others Are Horrid And Evil.

Ralph's list is the same as mine, and I would have a difficult time, in November, voting for Fiorina (the same as with Trump, FWIW). A Carson-Cruz ticket would, to me, have the twin virtues of being two very good candidates and being highly ironic in view of the Ds' meme that the Rs are Racists! Racists! Racists!. Especially given the Ds' current field of moldy-white-bread candidates.