DUmp crazy "private attorney general" told to get lost again

[Carl]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025844789

laserhaas (1,768 posts)

BREAKING: 9th Circuit (Bogusly) Dismisses HAAS v ROMNEY Racketeering Case
It ain't easy taking down big sleazies. Especially when the United States Government's employees, who swore an oath to protect the Constitution of the United States, believe such is secondary to brown nosing Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney organized crimes. Even judges can't deal with the facts and avoid them at all costs.



A ruling, without details, is simply arbitrariness, in a capricious manner, stating - THEY be big and you be too small; hence No chance at all! The problem the judges have, is the facts are so overwhelming, THEY must make sure such never sees (official) light of day. They can never allow our case to go to trial. So they continue to violate the Law/due process; and make up crap as they go - to protect Romney and his gang.

    9th Circuit (bogus) shut down of HAAS v ROMNEY (for Racketeering)




The ruling (here) states the following;

   

A review of the record and the responses to this court's August 21, 2014 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as to not require further argument. See United States v Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

    All pending motions are denied as moot.

    AFFIRMED

Why they had to rush and shut it down, is because I've been getting more attention lately. When they ordered me to come up with $505.00 (provided - by the way - at the generosity of several die-hard Repubs) and file a "Show Cause" reponse; then Romney and his gang also replied and LIED. When I put in a September 30, 2014 Objection to their attorneys lying and also testifying (a counsel can't make statements as if they are facts - without supplication of evidence 1st);

guess what - NO ONE responded!



Now I must ask the court to rehear the issue (and try) to force them to address the facts. One reporter, made a quaint remark about what the judges said of the bogus remark that my case is "insubstantial"!

The reporter said "What do you need, for Romney to mug you in front of the judges bench"?

Bet'cha that - even in that case - they would let Mitt "retroactively" retire from the crime.

Here's the link to the judge's Order
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_dismiss_haas_v_romney.pdf

This is a link to the docket (so you can see the timelines etc)
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_docket_summary_haas_v_romney.pdf

And this is a link to the particular case of U.S. v Hooton - that the judges cited
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_us_vhooton_1982.pdf



As the picture above (provided by artist D'Antuono who also sells Shirts of his "Too Big to Jail" pic - {HERE}) it is well accepted as axiomatic - that you simply beat City Hall (or those as powerful as).

Be that as it may, I find myself miffed; but undaunted in the quest for justice. Simply have too much evidence (including confessions) and no babbling, banter bull chit by those on bended knees before the lords of Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Willard Mitt Romney - will stop me.

They will - once a decent public servant comes forth - rue the day they lined themselves with iniquity!








Mitt has a big smile on his face now; but there will come a day when people will stop protecting him.

Supreme Court of the United States - Here We Come!




UPDATE - for those who care about the FACTS.


Here's (3AC Complaint for HAAS v ROMNEY Racketeering case) my 3rd Amended Complaint that Romney has fought so hard to prevent from becoming official. It is an improvement over my previous filings. It includes facts - sworn to under penalty of perjury - of the crimes committed. Justice is a commodity in America (unfortunately); and its hard to get justice - when they steal your entire life's work/savings.


But NOT impossible.

      
   

 

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Nov 20, 2014, 04:34 PM

MohRokTah (4,981 posts)
1. You are actually taking this to the SCOTUS?

Easy to predict the outcome.

Cert will be denied without comment.

Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 20, 2014, 04:43 PM

laserhaas (1,768 posts)
2. It was easy to predict that there are those among U.S. - who delight it Mitt getting away with it.

But that doesn't make it right!

Response to laserhaas (Reply #4)

Thu Nov 20, 2014, 06:22 PM

MohRokTah (4,981 posts)
6. IF you don't mind me asking, who is representing you? eom

Response to MohRokTah (Reply #6)

Thu Nov 20, 2014, 06:50 PM

laserhaas (1,768 posts)
7. No one! Had over a dozen attorneys; but each time I found more proof of crimes - they quit. 

Found Smoking Gun proofs that compelled the opposing parties to capitulate to their erroneous affidavits (concealing conflict of interests that debtor CEO was a partner of Creditor Committee counsel and Debtor's counsel was secretly working for Goldman Sachs). Every time I found another fraud - another attorney would refuse to inform the court and withdrew.

Then I found out the local firms (in Delaware) such as Bayard Firm;
had failed to disclose to me that they were also representing my opponents.
(in other matters).

Our chief justice approved contracts guaranteed legal fees of counsel - plus I gave them fees.

Bain Cap and GSachs gave them more!

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Nov 21, 2014, 10:54 AM

tritsofme (11,051 posts)
16. It's a shame you waste the time of so many people with this frivolity.

Truly delusional.

Response to tritsofme (Reply #16)

Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:18 AM

laserhaas (1,768 posts)
17. Do you think for one minute, your support for crooks

is misconstrued as anything else but the deceit it is?

I,m going to lay it all out;
and surprises are on the way.


Meanwhile, you may continue your delight in beating up on victims;

fir a little while longer.

Response to laserhaas (Reply #17)

Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:25 AM

Star Member cali (96,878 posts)
18. whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm a more than a little sick of this bogus dog shit

where someone says "you disagree with me thus you support the bad guys". Er, no. Not necessarily. I too think that your quest is more than a little quixotic- which is nicer than saying delusional. And it would be very, very hard to paint me as pro-corporate anything.

Too insane for the DUmp should tell a person something.

[HawkHogan]

This asshole is wasting my tax dollars.

[tanstaafl]

Just think, for a moment, how much nicer this world would be.

If laaserhaas had channeled his woebegone energies into something constructive. Maybe world hunger might have been eradicated, or peace might have broken out in the Middle East. Perhaps even Glowbull Warming might have been proven or disproven had laaserhaas applied that massive brain of his to real problems instead of listening to those voices in his head.

What a waste, on several levels. A waste of oxygen, waste of skin. And most importantly, a waste of the acres and acres of trees cut down, literally, to satisfy this maroon and his ill advised assault on Mitt Romney in the courts.

[DumbAss Tanker]

If laaserhaas had channeled his woebegone energies into something constructive. Maybe world hunger might have been eradicated, or peace might have broken out in the Middle East. Perhaps even Glowbull Warming might have been proven or disproven had laaserhaas applied that massive brain of his to real problems instead of listening to those voices in his head.

You may well be right, but my money is on "Nah, he just would've hosed that up royally, too."

 

[BlueStateSaint]

You may well be right, but my money is on "Nah, he just would've hosed that up royally, too."

 

He could probably **** up a wet dream . . .

[Dori]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025844789

Too insane for the DUmp should tell a person something.

That's for sure.....He is the living example of insanity.

[wasp69]

Response to laserhaas (Reply #17)

Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:25 AM

Star Member cali (96,878 posts)
18. whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm a more than a little sick of this bogus dog shit

where someone says "you disagree with me thus you support the bad guys".

If that is the case, you might want to consider logging off of DU, Eva...

[JohnnyReb]

I'm torn between tinfoil or lead as the cure for this DUmmies problems.

[FlippyDoo]

laserhaas (1,768 posts)

BREAKING: 9th Circuit (Bogusly) Dismisses HAAS v ROMNEY Racketeering Case
It ain't easy taking down big sleazies. Especially when the United States Government's employees, who swore an oath to protect the Constitution of the United States, believe such is secondary to brown nosing Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney organized crimes. Even judges can't deal with the facts and avoid them at all costs.



A ruling, without details, is simply arbitrariness, in a capricious manner, stating - THEY be big and you be too small; hence No chance at all!

Too bad lazyhoss. That be retardant.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

SidDithers (34,299 posts)

28. Kick...nt

Sid

[Zathras]

Heh, when the 9th Circuit Court, the most liberal and overturned in the land, tells you to take a hike, you know the person behind the case is an absolute loser.

[Ptarmigan]

This asshole is wasting my tax dollars.

He is a waste of oxygen.

[Karin]

indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial

Translation:   

He includes a "kitteh" picture in his OP.  Was that part of the legal argument?

Scuba and Malaise are actually encouraging him to "keep fighting."   

[tanstaafl]

Translation:   

He includes a "kitteh" picture in his OP.  Was that part of the legal argument?

Scuba and Malaise are actually encouraging him to "keep fighting."   

They encourage the Loserhaas to keep 'fighting!' so as to keep his Loser-Like focus off topics that may otherwise embarrass the DUmmies.

_{Which would take some doing.}

[Mr Mannn]

So. When the USSC denies a hearing to his 9th circus appeal...will we hear all about it?
Or will Laserbrain slink quietly off into the dark...and get a real job?

[landofconfusion80]

So. When the USSC denies a hearing to his 9th circus appeal...will we hear all about it?
Or will Laserbrain slink quietly off into the dark...and get a real job?

Ha! you're funny....

[freedumb2003b]

Did you read the complaint (3AC)?

It starts with "Plaintiff Steven Hass" (More commonly known as "laser")

I 100% guarantee the judge, after having a pretty good laugh, stopped reading there.

Who in the heck adds their internet name to a formal pleading???

No one that wants to be taken seriously.

This yahoo thinks he is too clever for the room.  Even when he is alone he isn't that!

[tanstaafl]

Did you read the complaint (3AC)?

It starts with "Plaintiff Steven Hass" (More commonly known as "laser")

I 100% guarantee the judge, after having a pretty good laugh, stopped reading there.

Who in the heck adds their internet name to a formal pleading???

No one that wants to be taken seriously.

This yahoo thinks he is too clever for the room.  Even when he is alone he isn't that!

I understand he represents himself.

I wonder which is more true. He who represent himself has a ffol for a client. Or, he who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer.

[I_B_Perky]

I'm torn between tinfoil or lead as the cure for this DUmmies problems.

I vote lead.

[diesel driver]

Heh, when the 9th Circuit Court, the most liberal and overturned in the land, tells you to take a hike, you know the person behind the case is an absolute loser.

That was my thought as the well.  If you're too stupid for the 9th Circuit Court, you're just TOO stupid!

    

[USA4ME]

malaise

11. Still glad you tried

msanthrope

13. Me, too. I'm so glad our federal courts have the time for this. Not my habeas for someone actually in jail....but for a furniture mover.

How stupid do you have to be to have Ms. Piggy representing you? She and that idiot Kyle Gothmog fighting over who can eat the most donuts should be the only time either are allowed out of their rubber rooms.

.

[Big Dog]

Translation:   

He includes a "kitteh" picture in his OP.  Was that part of the legal argument?

Scuba and Malaise are actually encouraging him to "keep fighting."   

A certain mole  sends The Laser regular PMs, encouraging him to "speak truth to power" and "keep up the good fight".

DU Moles: Spreading fertilizer where the turdblossoms are most likely to bloom, since January 20, 2001!

[txradioguy]

Heh, when the 9th Circuit Court, the most liberal and overturned in the land, tells you to take a hike, you know the person behind the case is an absolute loser.

I'd add that if DU is telling you you're nuts...you should reconsider your position as well.

[ChuckJ]

Response to tritsofme (Reply #16)

Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:18 AM

laserhaas (1,768 posts)
17. Do you think for one minute, your support for crooks

is misconstrued as anything else but the deceit it is?

I,m going to lay it all out;
and surprises are on the way.


Meanwhile, you may continue your delight in beating up on victims;

fir a little while longer.

I wonder if he uses commas and apostrophes interchangeably in his court documents. And if he talks about Christmas trees.