The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on December 04, 2019, 02:28:50 PM
-
kentuck (94,602 posts)
Turley is weak.
He is suggesting that there can be no "Obstruction of Justice" unless it is against the Supreme Court.
Since the Supreme Court is not given the duty of oversight of the Executive Branch, it would be a dereliction of duty for the Congress to forfeit their Constitutional duties to the Supreme Court, it seems to me?
It is the sole responsibility of Congress to impeach and to file charges against the President. It is up to the Senate to rule on it.
I do not believe Turley is making very valid arguments.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212751101
Nobody cares what you think.
-
No, he didn't. Turley said the POTUS has the right to use the courts as any other citizen which, as Trump has done, means he can go to the judiciary to stop Congressional subpoenas. If the courts rule against him, and he refused to comply with those rulings, then that would be obstruction. But, that hasn't happened.
The bluegrass primitive has major mental issues.
.
-
kentuck (94,602 posts)
Turley is weak.
No he isn't. Otherwise you wouldn't have bothered saying it. You're scared he's not weak. You're scared he has natural TV-charisma. You're scared of his traditional Democrat stridency which fatally contrasts to how far whacko-left you progs have dragged the Party.
-
Turley is weak? You're weak!
https://youtu.be/mikCQoDG2Ls
-
This "witness"' crack should have DUpipo wiggly-giggly in delight, https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2019/12/04/dem-witness-presidential-power-trump-can-name-son-barron-cant-make-baron/ .
-
kentuck (94,602 posts)
Turley is weak.
He is suggesting that there can be no "Obstruction of Justice" unless it is against the Supreme Court.
Since the Supreme Court is not given the duty of oversight of the Executive Branch, it would be a dereliction of duty for the Congress to forfeit their Constitutional duties to the Supreme Court, it seems to me?
It is the sole responsibility of Congress to impeach and to file charges against the President. It is up to the Senate to rule on it.
I do not believe Turley is making very valid arguments.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212751101
Wrong Kentuck! Try again!
-
No Kentuck.
He made some very valid, coherent statements. Among other things, he basically said, "What you're accusing him of, you've done." It's what everyone is thinking.
-
No Kentuck.
He made some very valid, coherent statements. Among other things, he basically said, "What you're accusing him of, you've done." It's what everyone is thinking.
When I glanced at the shallow end of the societal pool today, the DUmmies were trying to get #fireturley trending.
Isn't it delightful to watch the left start eating their own? Between Turley and poor widdle Kammie, the left is giving itself a serious rectal exam in the past 24 hours. May it be horrifically painful, liberals.
-
>kentuck (94,602 posts) Turley is weak.
Weak like your kinfolk that try to extradite your ingrown penis from its shell just so you can emit your bile?
-
Turley is weak.
And schiff is a pedophile. And the rest of you are hate filed losers who can't give into the fact you lost. :bird: :bird: :bird: :loser: :loser: :loser: :loser:
-
And schiff is a pedophile. And the rest of you are hate filed losers who can't give into the fact you lost. :bird: :bird: :bird: :loser: :loser: :loser: :loser:
Schiff’s day is coming . . . If I had to guess, about Labor Day.