We recommend Walker; his removal isn't justified

[beefeater]

Liberal/Lefty MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL endorses Walker!

Scott Walker's policies are controversial, but arguments over policies - no matter how sharp - aren't reason enough to end a governor's term.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker should have the opportunity to complete his term.

No governor in recent memory has been so controversial. No governor in America is so polarizing. Everyone has an opinion about Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin.

Here's ours: We see no reason to remove Walker from office. We recommend him in the June 5 recall election.

Walker's rematch with Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett was prompted by one issue: Walker's tough stance with the state's public-employee unions. It's inconceivable that the recall election would be occurring absent that. And a disagreement over a single policy is simply not enough to justify a vote against the governor.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/we-recommend-walker-his-removal-isnt-justified-l55ecb6-152111305.html

And another MOONBAT idea seems headed for the DUmp. That wailing you'll be hearing shortly is the democrat party.

Oh BTW EdHeads, suck it. Schultz will be apoplectic next week, he appears to have bet his whole career on removing the duly elected Governor.

[Kyle Ricky]

I wonder how the libtards are going to take this? They will say the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is right wing now.

[Ballygrl]

WOW! Does DU know?

[Revolution]

  When the MJS is speaking reasonably in the deep blue cesspool that is Milwaukee, you know the left has no chance.

Go Gov. Walker!

[BEG]

Ha 

[Lacarnut]

I commend the newspaper on it's wisdom and sense of fairness. Heck, if we applied the same standards to Obummer, he would be outta here, and wild eyed crazy Joe would be Prez. Perish the thought.

[Mr Mannn]

I'm getting used to leftists using propaganda, lies, even lawbreaking to win at all costs. To see a fair judgement coming from a lefty newspaper is dramatic. I hope its a trend, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

[NHSparky]

I wouldn't hold my breath, but it's nice to see that once in a while even the lefties can read the writing on the wall and call it for what it is rather than how they see it.

But then again, anyone here really expect the NYT to endorse Romney over Obama?

[marv]

It's just the MSJ's "...I was for it before I was against it..." explanation. They need to keep their pro-Walker subscribers, too.

Move along, there's nothing to see here.

[Kyle Ricky]

I commend the newspaper on it's wisdom and sense of fairness. Heck, if we applied the same standards to Obummer, he would be outta here, and wild eyed crazy Joe would be Prez. Perish the thought.

Crazy Joe is talking about running in 2016. That stupid fool won't make it past the primaries.

[Revolution]

You expect him to make the Primaries?!

[obumazombie]

When leftists act civilized, one should always be wary of ulterior motives. In this case the paper, by endorsing the Governor, could be trying to send the message to conservatives that the election is in the bag, and not all their votes will be needed.

[Revolution]

We're too smart to fall for that one. We certainly still need to get out and vote, but if we do? Yeah...it's in the bag.