DEMOCRATS SHOULD NOT OWN GUNS... HERE IS PROOF...

[Linda]

I got invited to join a new facebook page DAD Disarm ALL Democrats  by William Looman, remember the guy who said  'Not Hiring Until Obama Is Gone'


https://www.facebook.com/pages/DAD-Disarm-ALL-Democrats/580653048661517

I thought some of you guys might be interested in checking it out too.

Below is from there ABOUT page:



DEMOCRATS SHOULD NOT OWN GUNS... HERE IS PROOF...


Description
DEMOCRATS SHOULD NOT OWN GUNS... HERE IS PROOF...

In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the
United States.
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the
United States who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President
of the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan.
In 1984 James Hubert a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986 Patrick Sherrill a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 15 people
in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 10 people at a
GMAC office.
In 1991 George Hennard a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 5
coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 8 people at a
church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a
failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003 Douglas Williams a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people
at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho shot and killed 32
people in Virginia Tech.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people in a school.
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
No NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservatives are involved.
SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
Basic Info
Joined Facebook   09/16/2013

[DefiantSix]

Umm...

In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the
United States...

Unless my history teacher was seriously drunk that day, wasn't Abraham Lincoln shot in 1865???

[Dori]

No wonder they are so anti-gun.  They don't trust themselves or people in their own party.

On that, I have to agree with them.

[Linda]

Umm...

Unless my history teacher was seriously drunk that day, wasn't Abraham Lincoln shot in 1865???

You are right it was 1865....

[Ptarmigan]

Reagan was assassinated in 1981, while Sandy Hook happened in 2012.

[Eupher]

Reagan was assassinated in 1981, while Sandy Hook happened in 2012.

Uh...Reagan underwent an assassination attempt in 1981, but John Hinckley failed to complete his mission.

[Ptarmigan]

Uh...Reagan underwent an assassination attempt in 1981, but John Hinckley failed to complete his mission.

Sorry for the wording. John Hinckley was found insane when he was not. Tried to impress Jodie Foster.

[obumazombie]

Umm...

Unless my history teacher was seriously drunk that day, wasn't Abraham Lincoln shot in 1865???

This makes me wonder where all the survivors were buried.

[DefiantSix]

This makes me wonder where all the survivors were buried.

Actually, the number and magnitude of factual errors in this list makes me wonder if it wasn't put out like this deliberately, to be casually reviewed and passed along by conservatives and thereby destroy our individual credibility at the grass roots level.

Remember folks; the Devil will tell you 9 truths - or 99 or however many it takes - in order to get one lie past you. (Yes, lurking DUmbshits; I just referred to you and your regime as agents of the Devil himself. Suck it long and hard. )

[Linda]

I went back and posted this on the page but have gotten no response from them...

"I posted your link on a conservative political forum with the info on your ABOUT page....you might want to recheck some of the dates you have listed there...Lincoln's shooting and Reagans attempted assination for two...It was pointed out to me that they were wrong."


Maybe they will eventually fix the errors or not, I don't know....

[BlueStateSaint]

Linda, whether or not the errors are fixed is immaterial, IMO.  The premise is the same--Democratics should not be allowed to own firearms.

[biersmythe]

Yep you could tell me that the sky is red...no matter if the fact is true or not, demonrats should not have guns. They do not use their heads for thought they just go by "feelings" THAT is what makes them dangerous.  So on that note NO GUNS FOR DUmmys!!! 

[Linda]

You will get no argument from me on that point.

[Freeper]

Leftists can barely be trusted with the dull end of a crayon.

[DefiantSix]

Linda, whether or not the errors are fixed is immaterial, IMO.  The premise is the same--Democratics should not be allowed to own firearms.

The premise IS correct - I agree with you on that score. But attempting to use these as written can only damage our credibility on the debate floor when it's needed most of all.  

The opposition lies; big lies, little lies, shithouse rumors to "studied statistics" and every flavor of bullshit in between are the opposition's stock in trade. They will have no hesitation in seizing on relatively minor factual errors and crowing them from the rooftops as proof that we are either untrustworthy, ignorant of readily available history, or both. The fact that we aren't the originators of this particular compilation will not be mentioned at all by them, and will be glossed over quickly whenever anybody else does bring it up.

We're in a war for our very way of life, and information is the ammunition we fight with. Make sure of your shot before you let it fly - for God's sake - is all I'm saying.

[biersmythe]

The premise IS correct - I agree with you on that score. But attempting to use these as written can only damage our credibility on the debate floor when it's needed most of all.  

The opposition lies; big lies, little lies, shithouse rumors to "studied statistics" and every flavor of bullshit in between are the opposition's stock in trade. They will have no hesitation in seizing on relatively minor factual errors and crowing them from the rooftops as proof that we are either untrustworthy, ignorant of readily available history, or both. The fact that we aren't the originators of this particular compilation will not be mentioned at all by them, and will be glossed over quickly whenever anybody else does bring it up.

We're in a war for our very way of life, and information is the ammunition we fight with. Make sure of your shot before you let it fly - for God's sake - is all I'm saying.

I am in agreement with you my friend do not let my humor send you astray. The media is prime example of this fact everyday. Obummer says something stupid (well if he is talking) and they shove it under the rug.... but if one repube as much as stutters he is crucified.

[obumazombie]

I am in agreement with you my friend do not let my humor send you astray. The media is prime example of this fact everyday. Obummer says something stupid (well if he is talking) and they shove it under the rug.... but if one repube as much as stutters he is crucified.

Highly Concentrated Truth in your assessment.