http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1342791sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 08:28 AM
Original message
More Say They Are Worse Off Than Under Bush
A new Bloomberg Poll finds that by a 44% to 34% margin Americans say they believe they are worse off than when President Obama took office.
Two-thirds say they believe the country is on the wrong track overall.
Nonetheless, the public "remains ambivalent about the Republican Party's economic stewardship. Asked to rate Obama's vision for the economy against that of the Republicans, poll respondents favor the president's by 40% to 37%, though that is a deterioration from a 12-percentage-point advantage Obama maintained three months ago."
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/06/22/more_say_t...
Just to let you know, this will not change in time for the 12 elections.
deutsey (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I really wish Obama had done something early on to show him as a clear alternative to Bush
He lost "the audacity of hope" almost as soon as he was elected.
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. You mean like the 800B stimulus?
I understand that most of that money is unspent. obama is planning to use it for his reelection.
deutsey (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. No I mean something much larger and more aggressive
Like economists whose opinions I agree with were calling for.
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. And clearly he had the votes in Congress for such a thing, right?
The stimulus was already the largest in history. It would have been great if it was bigger. But then there is that silly little Congress, those votes that need to exists ... and if you recall, even then, we did not have 60 Dems to pass it (the GOP was blocking the seating of Franken).
And then you have the 5-6 bluedogs.
So Obama was able to get the largest stimulus every passed through ... but he's a bad guy because it wasn't bigger.
Those economists you agree with ... any of them have the numbers on where the votes for their plans would come from? I mean these are folks that are good at math right? They should be able to count to 60 and NAME the Senators that would have voted for their plans.
They can claim that it should have been bigger, but I have yet to see one put forward the names of the 60 Senators that would support their plan. And there is a reason for that. They couldn't get 60.
Your own party screwed you. LOL.
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure it's only temporary, but the company I work for cut back
to 32 hour weeks about 2 months ago. This is the first time hours have been cut since I started working here 17 years ago.
Next comes 24 hours and no bennies.
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Remember how Reagan won?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loBe0WXtts8
“Are you better off than you were four years ago?â€
And the "I can't see the forest for the trees" post.
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Jun-22-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. On average, they are Updated at 5:02 PM
Even with W's ****ups and constant whittling away at our economic base and filling of bubbles, we held up better during the first 6 years of W than we have during the first 2 1/2 of Obama. Of course, Bushco eventually was too much for our economy to take, and it cracked and popped.
Much will depend on if people can remember who started the current depression. I am not hopeful.
And if Obama winds, and we still are mired in this in 2016, The repubs could run Bachmann and win. Because Obama and the democrats will own the depression by that time.
And what was the major change that happened during the last two years of GW's presidency? Here's a clue. She used a broom to get back home to San Fran on week-ends.