Oh my.
No link, but most know anyway where this comes from.
nadinbrzezinski (115,894 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:03 PM
Apparently my personal view that a former LAPD chief lied
When he claimed he never met Dorner, never mind the photographic evidence to the contrary, is a hidable offense.... Yes, I asked brother buzz if he was "that sense". I have seen worst things stand, some directed at me. (For the record, DU'er is now in the non person list, to avoid any more incidents)
nadinbrzezinski This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide
143. That he never met the subject.
Then there is a photo of him with the Chief.
Are you that dense?
A Jury voted 4-2 to hide this post on Fri Feb 8, 2013, 10:42 AM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See Community Standards.)
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: One of your posts has been hidden by a DU Jury
At Fri Feb 8, 2013, 08:35 AM, an alert was sent on the following post:
That he never met the subject.
http://www.democraticunde...orum=1002&pid=2335986
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunde...boutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards[/url].)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
"Are you that dense" is a personal attack, totally out of place as a response to an unoffensive post.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri Feb 8, 2013, 08:42 AM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Agreed. Personal attack.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: kind of bullyish post. HIDE.
CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DECISION
You will no longer be able to participate in this discussion thread, and you will not be able to start a new discussion thread in this forum until 9:42 AM. This hidden post has been added to your <a href="/?com=profile&uid=127191&sub=trans">Transparency page[/url].[/i]
Yup, I will bring these stupid decisions from a broken system. Though I know the intent. The intent is to have me labelled as disruptor and a pizza, ppr delivery. That is the intent from a small crew of people who are untouchable.
But hey, the best part is this. From juror 6
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: kind of bullyish post. HIDE.
The irony, oh the irony.
Hmmm.
The iggy list is now the non-person list?
zappaman (7,221 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:06 PM
1. It was hidden for the insult
Sorry you can't see that.
Good hide.
The Magistrate (79,911 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:15 PM
4. Such Odd Things Make You Happy, Sir...
zappaman (7,221 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:17 PM
6. I expressed no emotion, sir.
Where in my words do you see an expression of happiness?
The Magistrate (79,911 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:26 PM
8. Everybody Knows Your Animosity To Ms. Brzezinski, Sir
Everybody knows you are no longer a host in General Discussion because you abused hosting powers to act on your animosity towards her.
Everybody knows you stalk her postings, and have done for a long time.
I have no particular fondness for the lady, nor any particular animosity towards her; I sometimes do not agree with her ,and sometimes I do, and sometimes things she says make me shake my head a little.
But your conduct towards her presents a repellent spectacle, and you ought to be ashamed of yourself for it, and at the very least have the decency to keep it private, and not put it out on public display.
zappaman (7,221 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:28 PM
10. Thanks for not being able to back up your claim, sir.
With all due respect, can you tell me what I'm feeling at this moment?
Have a pleasant day, sir!
morningfog (3,442 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:41 PM
30. It is all out there for everyone to see.
hrmjustin (6,048 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:28 PM
11. Well said!!!
MADem (82,619 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:30 PM
13. Two candidates for "forced ignore" perhaps?
The Magistrate (79,911 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:34 PM
15. That Tool, My Friend, Is No Longer Available....
I expect it would have been proposed back in our day.
So, for that matter, might a 'nasty-gram' on the subject of stalking, with termination a real possibility if ways were not mended.
<<<wonders why the magisterial primitive is being such a grouch.
Probably hasn't been dog-collared and whipped by the wife today.
MADem (82,619 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:38 PM
17. I know--maybe it should be dusted off and brought back by popular demand?
It seems like, post-election, there's more than the usual carping, sniping, griping, getting pissy, and taunting than there was prior to November.
The wheels of the juries grind slowly on DU3...it takes a lot longer for a person to get a reputation that puts them in danger of PPR.
When my teeth start getting set on edge, I trot out that HIDE THREAD thing--it seems to work well enough, though it takes a bit of discipline to use it!
DainBramaged (36,833 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:01 PM
19. I think I know of whom you speak
had the same problem, had to pull the plug
Has something to do with 'man"
Too bad no one's pulled the plug on the brain-damaged primitive's life-support.
pintobean (8,223 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:33 PM
27. If you had him on ignore, you wouldn't be able to see this sub-thread.
Taverner This message was hidden by Jury decision.
morningfog (3,442 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:41 PM
28. Do you have a program to alert you each time nadin posts? Such a strange obsession.
Of course, and we even have a "nadin alert" over here on the other side of the fence, to alert us that there's more funny stuff for us.
ScreamingMeemie (60,308 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:14 PM
2. I think it's for the "are you that dense", however, if someone had posted that to you, and the same jurors had voted on it, I begin to believe it would still be standing.
And there is where the jury system is broken.
The jury system seems to be working just fine, doing its job, and doing its job well.
nadinbrzezinski (115,894 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:21 PM
7. Which s the point I made.
View profile
A lot worst has been left standing. Hell, we have some of the non entities posting here. I beg off people don't talk to them...ignore them.
The objective is to pile as many hidden posts as possible...you see disruptor.
Good luck hiding just news or NWS statements.
I am about to do just that.
RZM (7,841 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:36 PM
16. Worse posts have stayed, but plenty of similar posts have also been hidden
Anything that's personal in any way runs the risk of being hidden. It doesn't mean you were right or wrong . . . that's just how it goes. It's a risk you take when you choose to participate in an argument with another poster.
I wouldn't worry about it. It's just one hidden post, which doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things
nadinbrzezinski (115,894 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:45 PM
18. Person is now on non person list
And good luck with hides on NWS product.
As I said, much, much, much worst has been said to me and others and left standing.
Some pigs are indeed more equal than others. I have felt this way, and shit like this, due to what has transpired over the years, sorry...
This is about an agenda...so will give them not one excuse. Reminds me of HS quite frankly...more and more.
muriel_volestrangler (63,646 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:48 PM
32. "non entity"? "non person"? You're looking quite nasty, nadin
You give the impression you think yourself better than an awful lot of DUers. You insult another DUer, for no reason, but asking "are you that dense?"; then you insult him further, by talking about your 'non person' list - is that how you see other DUers, as not even people?; and then you call people replying to your thread 'non entities'.
You are here, screaming for attention, begging for sympathy, displaying your imagined wounds to portray yourself as a martyr, and unable to accept that your post was hidden for the insult you made. Not content with that, you insult people who give you the attention you crave.
It's shoddy behaviour, nadin. You are making yourself look very bad.
pintobean (8,223 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:15 PM
3. The person you insulted was Brother Buzz not "Buzzclick".
Also, the quote from you're excerpt:
Bratton does not recall meeting Dorner, despite a widely publicized photo of the two shaking hands
If someone doesn't remember something, that doesn't mean he's lying.
zappaman (7,221 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:16 PM
5. to be fair...
that is not why the post was hidden.
Telling that the OP can't see why.
ScreamingMeemie (60,308 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:27 PM
9. It's becoming a little bit more telling to see you spending a lot of time posting not-so-nice responses in thread started by or about nadin.
I have no dog in this race, but that is what stands out most to me.
MADem (82,619 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:29 PM
12. You called someone DENSE. That's RUDE.
It had nothing to do with your "personal view," it had everything to do with your PERSONAL INSULT.
You aren't the victim -- you were the aggressor. Don't say mean things about people and you won't have any trouble.
Brickbat (13,721 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:32 PM
14. You buys your ticket, you takes your chances.
Taverner (52,104 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:26 PM
25. The Pro-LAPDers get away with ALL kinds of name calling
INsults, etc
But if we defend ourselves its a one way trip to ban land
It does not go both ways
<<<thinks the Taverner primitive is going only one way, down a dead-end street.
Taverner (52,104 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:25 PM
24. They are either LAPD Groupies or Trolls
One not better than the other
They gang up on me too
But **** them - they contribute nothing but bile and feces to the conversation
<<<will have to check to see if the Taverner primitive at some time had some "problems" with the Los Angeles Police Department, as it surely seems a personal vendetta on his part.
