I doubt you'll be happy here, and responding to you point by point would waste a lot more of my life than I want to spend on it, especially since your parentheticals and certain nuances indicate you just want to quibble and aren't actually interested in learning anything.
However....
The two concepts are not so much end states as they are fundamental philosophies.
The central idea of Conservatism is that things are working tolerably well under traditional forms and while they may need periodic tweaks or adjustments, or even major intervention to meet truly extraordinary events, the system is working tolerably well. Now, conceptions about what those traditions and founding ideas actually are, or what parts might need tweaking, vary considerably from person to person, so there is not necessarily a unifying single social issue that all Conservatives everywhere would nod and say, yep, that captures it.
The central idea of Liberalism is that traditional forms have failed dismally to accomplish what they are supposed to (and ideals of what they are supposed to accomplish are highly diffuse and variegated in the Liberal mind), and the only means to correct this is through massive social change in societal institutions (and what those changes should be is another wildly divergent field, ranging from prohibiting corporal punishment of children to killing off half the Earth's population to 'Save the planet').
Neither set is monolithically devoted to the programs, ideas, and objectives you ascribe to them.
And that's all I have to say about that.
