I'm not sure if this goes here, or in the Election 2008 forum, but because I'm using a headline more appropriate to the story than the official headline, I'll put it here.
If it belongs somewhere else, feel free to move this.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081212/D950R4O80.htmlThe official headline is "Ill. contenders for Senate seat walking fine line," and the story deals with the predicaments peculiar to each of the Democrats who had hoped to be named to replace 0bama.
There's lots and lots of complications for everybody.
But then out of the blue pops this, when the article describes the candidates available to Patrick Quinn, the current lieutenant governor (and not especially enamored of the current governor); Quinn of course is a Democrat:
.....Part of the difficulty for potential appointees is that Quinn hasn't formed many close alliances in Springfield, so there are few favors to cash in, Mooney said.
"Quinn is a populist, good-government guy," Mooney said. "I think he would base it on whatever criteria he has, but it wouldn't be so much a lobbying situation."
Mooney doesn't believe Quinn would appoint any of the candidates Blagojevich was considering. Instead, he suggested Quinn might make a clean break by appointing someone outside the current political establishment like former Gov. Jim Edgar, a Republican with an unblemished reputation.....
Of course, for that to happen, depends upon a whole lot of things, and one assumes the current Democrat-controlled Illinois state legislature would rather enact a special election for the seat, if it looks as if the new governor's going to appoint a Republican.
But it's an interesting possibility, maybe a 5-in-100 shot.