Author Topic: Really Nancy???  (Read 1803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Really Nancy???
« on: February 18, 2013, 06:01:19 PM »
Quote

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 09:39 AM

Star Member proud2BlibKansan (95,787 posts)

View profile
"Struggling to make ends meet" on $174K a year?? Really Nancy??? [View all]
Nancy Pelosi begs us not to ruin her dignity by cutting her paycheck

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is speaking out against a cut in congressional pay because she says it will undermine the dignity of their positions. "I think we should respect the work we do," Pelosi said. "I think it's necessary for us to have the dignity of the job that we have rewarded." ("Dignity" is apparently a synonym for "fat paycheck.") Pelosi, whose husband, Paul, is a legit real-estate mogul, was quick to add that slicing her own paycheck wouldn’t "mean as much" as those senators who struggle to make ends meet on $174,000 per year. "We are obviously contemplating a sequester," Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer (D) said. "Obviously we are going to take a cut, like everybody else."



http://m.now.msn.com/nancy-pelosi-says-cutting-congress-pay-undermines-dignity-of-job
35
   
   

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2392954

Very large bonfire of quite conflicted primitives.

 :popcorn:
   

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2013, 06:04:31 PM »
Quote
181. Do you give regular TV interviews and meet with foreign dignitaries?

View profile

Last edited Mon Feb 18, 2013, 01:33 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Are you still paying back loans on a law degree from an Ivy League university?
Do you fly across the country several times a month?

The real point is that a CEO of a pretty middling company can make ten times as much as a congressperson. Why are we pissing about complaining about Nancy Pelosi's $174K when it's the multi-million dollar salaries on Wall Street and in insurance and pharmaceutical and defence firms that are sucking this country dry.

If she was really good at coaching baseball nobody would blink an eye at her earning $17 million a year, so how about a little perspective?

The difference is of course that she is being paid with public funds, but please do go on.   She does real live television interviews?  Oh goodness -- GIVE HER A RAISE!!


Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2013, 06:06:06 PM »
If anyone needs a pay cut it is the clowns who run our government.

Because of them our paychecks are smaller and what we have left is stretched more and more due to the non inflation, inflation that is going on.

I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline ColonelCarrots

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
  • Reputation: +168/-60
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2013, 06:06:46 PM »
Poor baby... I'm playing the world's smallest violin right now.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2013, 06:08:40 PM »
Quote
madville (943 posts)
19. It really isn't much considering the job

View profile
And the way they have to live. Two households, travel, clothing, etc.

They probably take home around $7,000-8,000 a month after federal tax, social security, Medicare, state income taxes, TSP, mandatory retirement contribution, healthcare premium, dental, life insurance premium, etc, etc.

I'm a federal employee, I make $48,000 a year and take home about $2400 a month after all the deductions and that's in Florida, no state income tax.

Poor dearest dears.  They put up with so much to serve us.   Those bastards want to cut their pay.   :bawl:

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2013, 06:11:58 PM »
Quote

Response to zeemike (Reply #163)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 01:36 PM

Egalitarian Thug (5,963 posts)
183. I'm beyond amazed that Americans just don't seem to care at all about the blatant

View profile
graft that has come to be, not just common, but SOP in DC. The entire legislature is made up of rich people who come to make themselves richer or middle class people who come to make themselves rich and all at taxpayer expense. And nobody's doing anything for the people who send them and pay the bills.

Dirty freeper troll!!  Do you have an Ivy League education to pay off at .... how old is Pelosi again?



Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2013, 06:29:40 PM »
Congressional pay should be means tested.  Any income from investments or other sources should be deducted from their pay.  That way it protects the ones who are not independently wealthy and went there to do a job.


Something like that anyway. 

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Really Nancy???
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2013, 06:39:44 PM »
The woman is worried about dignity??????......hell, she should be embarrassed all to hell, holding such a high office and she can't even read.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Maxiest

  • Chief Interruptor Officer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2471
  • Reputation: +155/-101
  • IT Guru - Social Media Wizard - Recovery Advocate
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2013, 06:45:10 PM »
My position that most of you won't agree with but we say that we want people from all walks of life and back grounds to be interested in service in Congress and the government.

But Congress truly pays too little for that to really happen. So instead, we get a significantly wealthier and less "normal" distribution of people in Congress because they have to be people that are financially well off enough to not "care" about the money.

I am not saying that I love Congress and think they are always great. But if you compare the level of responsibility and work to anything in the private sector they are truly underpaid.

Since they are underpaid monetarily, we end with a group of legislators that receive the majority of their pay in two ways:

1) Future wages: they garner support from outside groups with plans to one day become lobbyists and the like

2) Power: Many legislators love/enjoy the POWER and Attention their office brings them. Underpaying monetarily means that the people who are attracted to "service" get a significant amount of their compensation from feeding their desire for power.

Both of these "pay" options result in bad outcomes for the American people.
"The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither; the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both."

"Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program."

"We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork."

-Milton Friedman

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10935
  • Reputation: +535/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2013, 07:05:30 PM »
The woman is worried about dignity??????......hell, she should be embarrassed all to hell, holding such a high office and she can't even read.

The way she looks, she should be ashamed to be seen in public.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2515
  • Reputation: +308/-54
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2013, 07:14:53 PM »
My position that most of you won't agree with but we say that we want people from all walks of life and back grounds to be interested in service in Congress and the government.


Good Lord Almighty! I've never said such a ridiculous thing.  That's how we end up with socialists clowns like Nancy Pelosi and Shelia Lee.

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14587
  • Reputation: +2285/-76
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2013, 07:21:49 PM »
What I'm reading there is "Don't pick on Democrats, pick on Republicans."  Had Boehner said what she did the ridicule from the primitives would have received 100% participation.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23610
  • Reputation: +928/-225
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2013, 07:22:40 PM »
Nancy Pelosi is a millionaire. No? I seem to recall that she is one of the richest Congress member.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10935
  • Reputation: +535/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2013, 07:22:52 PM »
Good Lord Almighty! I've never said such a ridiculous thing.  That's how we end up with socialists clowns like Nancy Pelosi and Shelia Lee.

Nothings stopping Shelia Jackson Lee from running far a political office. I mean, after all, she's a freed slave and can forge her own path.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2013, 07:38:01 PM »
My position that most of you won't agree with but we say that we want people from all walks of life and back grounds to be interested in service in Congress and the government.

But Congress truly pays too little for that to really happen. So instead, we get a significantly wealthier and less "normal" distribution of people in Congress because they have to be people that are financially well off enough to not "care" about the money.

I am not saying that I love Congress and think they are always great. But if you compare the level of responsibility and work to anything in the private sector they are truly underpaid.

Since they are underpaid monetarily, we end with a group of legislators that receive the majority of their pay in two ways:

1) Future wages: they garner support from outside groups with plans to one day become lobbyists and the like

2) Power: Many legislators love/enjoy the POWER and Attention their office brings them. Underpaying monetarily means that the people who are attracted to "service" get a significant amount of their compensation from feeding their desire for power.

Both of these "pay" options result in bad outcomes for the American people.

I think they should get minimum wage or even better a monthly salary that matches the salaries of the enlisted men and women. They start off at E-1 pay and can work their way up with each term up to E-9. To solve the having two house issue we set up barracks in DC and they stay in bunks, they get a chow hall and buses to run them back and forth. They get vouchers to fly in coach seating to go home and to come to DC for each session. I would also limit sessions to one a year and everything else they want to do they can use SKYPE.



I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +281/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2013, 08:51:46 PM »
I think they should get minimum wage or even better a monthly salary that matches the salaries of the enlisted men and women. They start off at E-1 pay and can work their way up with each term up to E-9. To solve the having two house issue we set up barracks in DC and they stay in bunks, they get a chow hall and buses to run them back and forth. They get vouchers to fly in coach seating to go home and to come to DC for each session. I would also limit sessions to one a year and everything else they want to do they can use SKYPE.





I've said something along those lines before. I think in my plan the pay was tied to O-3 pay. Since Congress sets the pay charts, there would also have to be some mechanism to prevent them from bumping that payscale up.

Offline Maxiest

  • Chief Interruptor Officer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2471
  • Reputation: +155/-101
  • IT Guru - Social Media Wizard - Recovery Advocate
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2013, 09:03:45 PM »
Good Lord Almighty! I've never said such a ridiculous thing.  That's how we end up with socialists clowns like Nancy Pelosi and Shelia Lee.

Really?  We are going to end up with them regardless... 
"The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither; the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both."

"Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program."

"We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork."

-Milton Friedman

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2013, 09:08:29 PM »
I think they should get minimum wage or even better a monthly salary that matches the salaries of the enlisted men and women. They start off at E-1 pay and can work their way up with each term up to E-9. To solve the having two house issue we set up barracks in DC and they stay in bunks, they get a chow hall and buses to run them back and forth. They get vouchers to fly in coach seating to go home and to come to DC for each session. I would also limit sessions to one a year and everything else they want to do they can use SKYPE.





Just as long as I get to run the fat little useless b*stards through PT every morning.
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Online DefiantSix

  • Set Condition One throughout the ship
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17477
  • Reputation: +1729/-189
  • Captain, IKV Defiant
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2013, 09:36:51 PM »
Congressional pay should be means tested.  Any income from investments or other sources should be deducted from their pay.  That way it protects the ones who are not independently wealthy and went there to do a job.


Something like that anyway. 

Even simpler: Congress-shits hereafter (in the universe where I was emperor for a day) would be paid whatever was leftover from that year's tax revenues AFTER all necessary expenditures are covered. If the yearly tax revenues leave $535 million over and above necessary expenditures, then each worthless Congress-shit would take home $1 million. If, after the country's business had been attended to, there was only $535 left in the coffers, well, then sorry; you get to take a dollar home as your pay for being a Congress-shit this year (better luck next year). If, however, the Congress-shits pull their usual number, and run a deficit, then they get the joy of either (a) going back over the budget, and finding which "necessary expenditures" aren't quite as necessary as they first thought; or (b) the whole damnable lot of them are personally on the hook for the deficit amount, payable in full before any of them leave the capitol for any reason.
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government in not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

Offline Jasonw560

  • Is a Juke Box
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2032
  • Reputation: +143/-42
  • PhD from Sarcastic State
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2013, 09:38:22 PM »
They should do what Texas does.

Ours meets every 2 years, makes an average of (I think) 20K for their time in session.

They pay for hotels on their own dime, and many of them fly/drive home on the weekends.

With all the technology, why can't they have committee meetings and such via SKYPE, as Freeper suggested, or conference calls?

Their main offices should be right smack dab in the middle of the district they represent if they're Reps, and in the poorest shithole in the state if they are Senators.

Want protection? Pay for it yourself. Limo? Your own money. Fancy hotel room in New York? Your dime.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
-Aristotle

"Metaphors needn't be explained to educated people"-Ted
Nugent

"Life ain't fair. Get over it or wear a helmet" -diesel driver

Offline IassaFTots

  • In WTF-istan, I am considered a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13972
  • Reputation: +768/-274
  • Oh well, I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway.
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2013, 08:11:57 AM »
The way she looks, she should be ashamed to be seen in public.

Not coffee, but grits.  GRITS!  All over my keyboard.  Damn you Tucker!   :argh:

 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

R.I.P. LC and Crockspot.  Miss you guys.

The infinite is possible at zombocom.  www.zombo.com

"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." ~ Martin Luther King
 
“Political Correctness is about turning a blind eye to painful reality because your comfortable feelings are more important to you than saving lives and providing quality of life to people who work their ass off to be productive and are a benefit to this great American Dream"  ~Ted Nugent

Offline Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2515
  • Reputation: +308/-54
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2013, 08:17:00 AM »
Nothings stopping Shelia Jackson Lee from running far a political office. I mean, after all, she's a freed slave and can forge her own path.

When "diversity" is the goal, logic, common sense, reality, and even America herself is thrown out the proverbial window.

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9126
  • Reputation: +605/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2013, 08:46:33 AM »
Even simpler: Congress-shits hereafter (in the universe where I was emperor for a day) would be paid whatever was leftover from that year's tax revenues AFTER all necessary expenditures are covered. If the yearly tax revenues leave $535 million over and above necessary expenditures, then each worthless Congress-shit would take home $1 million. If, after the country's business had been attended to, there was only $535 left in the coffers, well, then sorry; you get to take a dollar home as your pay for being a Congress-shit this year (better luck next year). If, however, the Congress-shits pull their usual number, and run a deficit, then they get the joy of either (a) going back over the budget, and finding which "necessary expenditures" aren't quite as necessary as they first thought; or (b) the whole damnable lot of them are personally on the hook for the deficit amount, payable in full before any of them leave the capitol for any reason.

The only problem I see with this is the congress-shits raising taxes every year so they get a paycheck + a nice "bonus".

Of course, they will be "exempt" from any said tax hikes, just like now.

I think they should be paid from their STATE treasuries whatever stipend the state legislature deem "appropriate" for their service.
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.

Online DefiantSix

  • Set Condition One throughout the ship
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17477
  • Reputation: +1729/-189
  • Captain, IKV Defiant
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2013, 09:16:56 AM »
The only problem I see with this is the congress-shits raising taxes every year so they get a paycheck + a nice "bonus".

Of course, they will be "exempt" from any said tax hikes, just like now.

I think they should be paid from their STATE treasuries whatever stipend the state legislature deem "appropriate" for their service.

Oooh, I like that...  :devious:
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government in not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: Really Nancy???
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2013, 09:22:50 AM »
The only problem I see with this is the congress-shits raising taxes every year so they get a paycheck + a nice "bonus".

Of course, they will be "exempt" from any said tax hikes, just like now.

I think they should be paid from their STATE treasuries whatever stipend the state legislature deem "appropriate" for their service.

^5 to you, this is the best idea I have seen in years.     Citizens will be more likely to become choosy about their Representatives if they know their taxes could go up if they choose wrong and down if they choose a person that deserves a raise.