I'll have to check into it but I'm pretty certain that the Ranger Battalions do not have artillery assets so why would they need foward observers when every NCO and officer gets trained to do call for fire?
Regular infantry units get FO's attatched to them along with medics and other assets. The Rangers are mostly Infantry but I have never heard of them having other MOS in addition to that since they are no bigger then battalion size units. So I'm calling BS on David West as I see all of you others have too.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was a MOSfor it, butreally I don't see the need. We had FACs (pilots) and Naval Gunfire laisons, butany Cpl and many almost all LCpls in the marine Infantry could call and adjustat leastarty and mortars. Because Air and NG used different radios and freqs usually getting them involved relaying through a FAC NGL, or the Fire Support Coordination Center that has them would serve as intermediary and relay the mission. They listen in on most FS missions, or are supposed to, and can take over and redirect say, aircraft on station, to a lucrative target. You could call for mortars and end up finding youself recieving helo Gunships or fast movers, or heavy arty.
It was a FSCCthat refused fire for that event that dakotaMeyer got the MOH for. They also can abort misssions like they did that day. They are supposed to help, but with the nonsense ROEs that happened.
But if you go through RIP and getassigned to a ranger unit you are a ranger. Ranger School is for NCOs now pretty much.
But this Westguywent through bootand MOS training, Jump School, Rip, and did 4 months in Iraq. Then spent his second year getting himself discharged for his radical "Libertarian" attitude. They saw another Tim McVeigh in this guy, for sure.