The Conservative Cave

Trump supporters are now sending threatening letters to get people to vote for him

“We see you haven’t voted yet. Your voting record is public,” a recent mailer to Texas Republicans says. “Your neighbors are watching and will know if you miss this critical runoff election. We will notify President Trump if you don’t vote. You can’t afford to have that on your record.”

The mailer, which says it was sent by “The America First Conservatives Election Department,” showed up to voters leading up to the state’s May 28 primary election. Trump is likely to win the primary regardless – his opponents have all dropped out of the primary – but the mailer still strikes an ominous tone.

It adds, “We will contact you after the election to make sure you voted. Please don’t make us report you to President Trump! We are sending an official list of Republicans who fail to vote in the upcoming runoff to President Trump. Public records show that YOU HAVE NOT VOTED. President Trump will be VERY DISAPPOINTED.”

One redditor claims to have received this mailer, one rando alphabetsoup "news" site picks it up, along with more reddit comments, and it gets floated up the bowl to MSN.com. 

The gullibility of people is insane.  If these are real, if they are sent out by people who genuinely support Trump, so what?  What comes of it?  The May election in Texas is a run-off election for some candidates for the state congress.  All the verbage sounds like something the DUmp would come up with to "DU the poll" on a larger scale.  There are some crazy and stupid people out there that support Trump, but this seems beyond even most of them.  But it feeds the TDS, so the pill is swallowed without question by most. 

These idiots believe that inflation is falling because the percentage rate at which it's rising is "smaller". 

DUmmie caught a rerun of Beverly Hillbillies. 

Did Granny have her Rheumatiz Medicine in the other side pocket of her lift chair?

Listing, from the first through the eleventh of the GoogTube results I got is semantics? Let me try to put this simply:

I

just

Posted

the

facts.

No tricks, no twisting, just what I saw, in the top-down order the eleven videos were listed.

1. Yes.

2. No. That was the meaning of, "... my results were, in order ...".

3. Feel free, it won't be your first time, I'm sure. I've never felt the need to "BS" people, but to each his own.

Ah! Pulling the ol' semantics card to deny what was CLEARLY intended. And what I intended to demonstrate was the intervention by YouTube by using their "Developing News" shtick at the TOP OF THE PAGE to DIVERT the reader away from the search results.  ...You are moving ever closer to a serious chastisement again. Yes, I might be forced to publicly chastise you again, Sidney. I don't want to do it, Sidney. But if you force my hand I shall have to chastise you, Sidney. Son, I don't relish shooting a mosquito with an elephant gun, so why don't you just shuffle along? Don't remove the gangplank, Sidney - you may wanna get back onboard.