Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-01-10 08:28 PMOriginal messageDiebold Anyone care to discuss the other big stinky elephant in the room. I mean, besides Cliff Arnebeck, who has been tireless in fighting this abomination?
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-01-10 08:32 PMResponse to Original message1. It's ES&S now. Same crap - new owners. A single company now counts 80% of the votes... Not an audit in sight.What a country!
avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-01-10 08:34 PMResponse to Reply #12. I actually knew that but Diebold is the name most people recognize and there has been so little talk about it. Yeah, the Dems are as energized as they were in 2008 and yet, we will likely lose seats in places where the Dem turnout is huge. I think we need to talk about this and not just in the days before and after an election.
Half of the threads are predicting victory. Half are already blaming Diebold.There be a whole boatload of stupid loaded into a little space there.
And if you manage to win not another peep about Diebold will be heard until 2012.Well unless you guys use the same bullshit that the dems really won bigger than was shown.
So I take it the Diebold system worked flawlessly in 2008.
No, the Dems really won all 535 seats but Diebold changed the outcome.
I've always voted republican, why isn't that evil Diebold ATM machine at the bank giving me more money, after, you know, taking it from some deserving liberal?