Omaha Steve
1. Perhaps we will hear from those that approve of this bill?
Fs, people that live on a street named after a President, OR maybe somebody smarter than me might find a list of those groups that endorse LB 239.
Fs? There he goes with his stupid veiled threats again.
Little stevee wants someone "smarter than me" to provide a list of those who support. I'll do him one better. I'm infinately more intelligent than he can ever hope to be, so I'll explain to him about the main reason the groups he listed are against the bill becoming law and why it's illogical.
They claim that voter ID is racist. That's the basis of their complaints.
What little stevee needs to do is answer this.
Today railroads and hotels, along with almost all providers of public accommodations in almost all circumstances, are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race. So what happens when you ride on Amtrak, the government-subsidized railroad? You hear an announcement over the PA system advising you to be prepared to show your identification if the conductor asks to see it.
Likewise, these days there is a good chance you will be asked for identification when you check into a hotel. You need ID to board an airplane or to drive a car. Recently I visited a doctor whose office is in a hospital. Just to enter the premises, I needed to present ID to a security guard.
If black people have trouble producing identification, how come nobody ever claims that these requirements are discriminatory?
Another important aspect of civil rights is equal employment opportunity. Under the 1986 immigration law, when you are hired for a job, you are required to provide your employer with documents proving both your identity and your citizenship or legal residency. How come nobody ever claims these requirements discriminate against blacks?
It is possible that the ID requirements for planes, trains, automobiles, hotels, hospitals and jobs have justifications so compelling as to justify discrimination. It is also possible that, by contrast, preventing election fraud is not a sufficiently compelling justification. The point here is that no one has ever had to make the former argument, because nobody claims ID requirements are discriminatory against blacks except when it comes to voting.
.
