Obama Just doesn't get it

[Bondai]

How can you be this stupid and be President...He warn's the SCOTUS? warns them against what? upholding the US Constitution? What a maroon...

Combative Obama warns Supreme Court on health law

Obama Warn's SCOTUS

[txradioguy]

He's daring them...almost threatening them not to find his mandate Constitutional.

Anyone here want to lay odds on whether when the mandate is sturuck down he doesn't try to fire the entire SCOTUS and replace the current 9 with 9 that will vote his way every time?

[docstew]

He's daring them...almost threatening them not to find his mandate Constitutional.

Anyone here want to lay odds on whether when the mandate is sturuck down he doesn't try to fire the entire SCOTUS and replace the current 9 with 9 that will vote his way every time?

It wouldn't surprise me if he did try. The DUmmies are already laying groundwork for attacking "the legitimacy of the USSC"

[txradioguy]

It wouldn't surprise me if he did try. The DUmmies are already laying groundwork for attacking "the legitimacy of the USSC"

Bu-bu-but wait!...I thought the Libs saw the SCOTUS as the end all be all deciding factor in anything.  fF the SCOTUS rules then it's law above repproach fight?  Their ruling is the Gold standard no?

[Flame]

Bu-bu-but wait!...I thought the Libs saw the SCOTUS as the end all be all deciding factor in anything.  fF the SCOTUS rules then it's law above repproach fight?  Their ruling is the Gold standard no?

That's ony if they agree with what the libs want.  Otherwise they are all conservative patsies.

[Rebel]

He's daring them...almost threatening them not to find his mandate Constitutional.

Anyone here want to lay odds on whether when the mandate is sturuck down he doesn't try to fire the entire SCOTUS and replace the current 9 with 9 that will vote his way every time?

On what constitutional grounds and why would they even listen to the jackass? They don't work for him.

[JohnnyReb]

He's daring them...almost threatening them not to find his mandate Constitutional.

Anyone here want to lay odds on whether when the mandate is sturuck down he doesn't try to fire the entire SCOTUS and replace the current 9 with 9 that will vote his way every time?

Well, he could do like FDR and just add more justices....liberal ones of course.

[txradioguy]

On what constitutional grounds and why would they even listen to the jackass? They don't work for him.

I know it sounds a little CT'ish.  But give his lack of regard for the Constitution already what's to stop him?

I mean FDR threatened to do it to pass New Deal legislation.

I understand they are a co-equal part of Government to the President...if this scenario were to (God forbid) come to fruition I could see him going on TV and announcing that by Executive Order he has dissolved the current Supreme Court and has sent to Congress the names of 9 new justices...and that he encourages their swift and unanimous approval to the bench.  Then finish up his brief TOTUS apporved message by saying something along the lines of "The health of this nation and it's people cannot be decided by the political whims of 9 unelected activist lawyers.  The law was democratically passed and I intend to see it fully implemented.  Which is why I've taken this extrodinary step.  Thank you."

[Maxiest]

I know it sounds a little CT'ish.  But give his lack of regard for the Constitution already what's to stop him?

I mean FDR threatened to do it to pass New Deal legislation.

I understand they are a co-equal part of Government to the President...if this scenario were to (God forbid) come to fruition I could see him going on TV and announcing that by Executive Order he has dissolved the current Supreme Court and has sent to Congress the names of 9 new justices...and that he encourages their swift and unanimous approval to the bench.  Then finish up his brief TOTUS apporved message by saying something along the lines of "The health of this nation and it's people cannot be decided by the political whims of 9 unelected activist lawyers.  The law was democratically passed and I intend to see it fully implemented.  Which is why I've taken this extrodinary step.  Thank you."

It would never happen.  Now, if he had and all Demorat Congress... maybe.

I was watching the clip of him last night bitching about the SCOTUS and judicial activism...  I was thinking to myself; are you ****ing kidding me?  Our side generally says something about it when a ruling is unconstitutional... but then it's not judicial activism to you as long as it's something in your agenda.  But when something that is clearly unconstitutional that you had passed into law is on the verge of being struck down then it's judicial activism?  OOOOKKKKAAAYYYY!

[Rebel]

I know it sounds a little CT'ish.  But give his lack of regard for the Constitution already what's to stop him?

I mean FDR threatened to do it to pass New Deal legislation.

I understand they are a co-equal part of Government to the President...if this scenario were to (God forbid) come to fruition I could see him going on TV and announcing that by Executive Order he has dissolved the current Supreme Court and has sent to Congress the names of 9 new justices...and that he encourages their swift and unanimous approval to the bench.  Then finish up his brief TOTUS apporved message by saying something along the lines of "The health of this nation and it's people cannot be decided by the political whims of 9 unelected activist lawyers.  The law was democratically passed and I intend to see it fully implemented.  Which is why I've taken this extrodinary step.  Thank you."

To which the US Military should step up and detain his sorry ass for being a domestic enemy. One of their charges is to protect and defend the US Constitution and that would be a violation of the US Constitution. Not to mention they'd rule his EO as unconstitutional.

[CG6468]

To which the US Military should step up and detain his sorry ass for being a domestic enemy. One of their charges is to protect and defend the US Constitution and that would be a violation of the US Constitution. Not to mention they'd rule his EO as unconstitutional.

That's also part of the presidential oath.

"I, name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and I will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

No where does it say that he/she is supposed to change the Constitution to serve his/her purposes.

The chief pretender has violated his oath of office.

[Rebel]

That's also part of the presidential oath.

No where does it say that he/she is supposed to change the Constitution to serve his/her purposes.

The chief pretender has violated his oath of office.

He's derelict. I've said it many times.

[CG6468]

He's derelict. I've said it many times.

I know; so have I. But I'm just re-re-enforcing an opinion.

[wasp69]

I guess this kenyan jackass doesn't get the fact that insulting the USSC as a whole is just plain ****ing stupid.  Part and parcel for the smartest guy in the world, I guess...

[obumazombie]

I guess this kenyan jackass doesn't get the fact that insulting the USSC as a whole is just plain ****ing stupid.  Part and parcel for the smartest guy in the world, I guess...

I hope this one goes against him 9 to zero. Then we'll see who's illegitimate. Or as Rebel says, derelict.

[DLR Pyro]

For someone who claims to be a Constitutional scholar,it makes me question which Constitution he studied.  Certainly not ours.

[Zeus]

I hope this one goes against him 9 to zero. Then we'll see who's illegitimate. Or as Rebel says, derelict.

Nope it'll be a 4 - 4 split. Justices kennedy will be either the most respected and/or hated man in America

[DumbAss Tanker]

Being petulant about it isn't going to make him look good, and his claim that shooting down his overreaching law is "Judicial activism" is wildly off the mark.  There is zero chance that he would be able to screw with them in any direct way for revenge, though, since that would require legislation that would have absolutely no chance in the House and slim-to-none in the Senate.  Not all of the Dem Senators are the complete legislative whores he would need to pass this, though I exclude Reid and McCaskill from any such group with actual 'scruples' or 'principles.'

[Eupher]

Kagan is supposed to recuse herself, as she was Solicitor General and thus deeply involved in the jamming of Obamacare down our throats.

Yet the scrunt sat in the court during oral arguments.      

There's a political angle to this issue, in addition to the obvious one vis a vis SCOTUS and its constitutional duty to interpret the law.

It could well be that Barry and his Chicago thugs already see the handwriting on the wall (Obamacare will be struck down in toto) and thus intend to remove this legislation as an election talking point -- except, of course, to point out that Romney championed Obamacare at the federal level, even though Romney now says he'll repeal it. 

In other words, this goat**** legislation will be removed from the political spectrum leaving bin Laden's corpse, Barry's lies about increased drilling for oil, and just recently, some kind of bullshit crackdown on illegals that are known serious criminals (leaving the illegals that are presumably less serious criminals (since, after all, they're illegal) completely alone) as sidebar issues that make Barry look more presidential.

The lies and spin enacted by Sandra Fluke has had a serious effect on women, who now appear to be waffling and are heading back to the Obama camp (women, after all, were central in electing Obama to begin with), according to Bret Baier's program on Fox yesterday.

So all of these things (the lies and spin, principally) will serve Barry well as the average voter is too stupid to recognize how he's being swindled.

 

[obumazombie]

The lib use of the word scruples has been expanded to screwpeoples.

[Rebel]

Kagan is supposed to recuse herself, as she was Solicitor General and thus deeply involved in the jamming of Obamacare down our throats.

Yet the scrunt sat in the court during oral arguments.  

...and, it would appear, she may be giving Obama information on the court's decision, something that wasn't supposed to come out till June.  


Add that bitch to "the worst" list. Worst Treasury Sec'y. Worse AG. Worst ****ing USSC appointee. Worst labor sec'y. Worst DHS Sec'y. Worst, hell, I don't think there's merit in ANY of his ****ing czars or appointees. I guess that's what we get when we have THE WORST f'n PRESIDENT in history in office.

BTW, if that female Bush nominated wasn't "qualified", per the moonbats, how in the HELL is that never-been-a-judge bitch qualified?

[Eupher]

...and, it would appear, she may be giving Obama information on the court's decision, something that wasn't supposed to come out till June.  


Add that bitch to "the worst" list. Worst Treasury Sec'y. Worse AG. Worst ****ing USSC appointee. Worst labor sec'y. Worst DHS Sec'y. Worst, hell, I don't think there's merit in ANY of his ****ing czars or appointees. I guess that's what we get when we have THE WORST f'n PRESIDENT in history in office.

BTW, if that female Bush nominated wasn't "qualified", per the moonbats, how in the HELL is that never-been-a-judge bitch qualified?

You're thinking of Harriet Miers, who was GWB's White House counsel. It wasn't one of his best selections, but Harriet would be a John Marshall stacked up to any of Barry's appointees.

[Karin]

RE his ridiculous use of the word "unprecedented."  I was reading an article about New Deal-era Supreme Court activities.  I don't remember what POS was placed before the court, something to do with business.  The Court struck it down, and one of the justices called one of FDR's lackies into his office.  He said, "You go back and tell your boss that this business of trying to centralize everything stops here and stops now."  FDR was enraged, and that's when he tried to pack the court.  After he kicked the bucket came the term limit.

I was dumbfounded by this today.  I don't believe we've ever had a president who thought of himself as King of the World and Emperor of All.  I anticipate some great and scathing commentary in the days ahead, by better writers and thinkers than myself.  I hope there's a stinging backlash.  

[Chris_]

I don't remember what POS was placed before the court, something to do with business.  The Court struck it down, and one of the justices called one of FDR's lackies into his office.  He said, "You go back and tell your boss that this business of trying to centralize everything stops here and stops now."  FDR was enraged, and that's when he tried to pack the court.  After he kicked the bucket came the term limit.

It was the National Recovery Administration.

On 27 May 1935, in the court case of Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, the Supreme Court held the mandatory codes section of NIRA unconstitutional, because it attempted to regulate commerce that was not interstate in character, and that the codes represented an unacceptable delegation of power from the legislature to the executive. Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in invalidating the industrial "codes of fair competition" which the NIRA enabled the President to issue. The Court held that the codes violated the United States Constitution's separation of powers as an impermissible delegation of legislative power to the executive branch. The Court also held that the NIRA provisions were in excess of congressional power under the Commerce Clause.

Specifically, the Court invalidated regulations of the poultry industry promulgated under the authority of the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, including price and wage fixing, as well as requirements regarding a whole shipment of chickens, including unhealthy ones, which has led to the case becoming known as "the sick chicken case." The ruling was one of a series which overturned some New Deal legislation between January 1935 and January 1936, and which ultimately caused Roosevelt to attempt to pack the Court with judges that were in favor of the New Deal.

Wikipedia

[Ballygrl]

I guess you guys weren't listening to Rush? he was playing clips of Obama, and Obama made this comment:

"When the Court over......upholds healthcare"

Freudian slip? he was going to say overturn then he caught himself.