Primitive Likes 'Em Young, Fresh, & Probably Breathing Chloroform

[USA4ME]

Doctor_J

How old must a female be so that finding her sexually attractive is
  
Not pedophilic?

Not creepy?

I am not talking about acting on it. that's a different story with many variables. Just feeling it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1114&pid=10037

Roman Polanski lives.

.

 

[Wineslob]

Creepy poster is creepy.

[JohnnyReb]

Muzzie wanting someone to OK his marrying a 6 year old.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

If you have to ask...

[GOP Congress]

OK, "Doctor", by the posts...

How old must a female be so that finding her sexually attractive is
 

Not pedophilic?

Asking this makes you a pedophile.

Not creepy?

Asking this makes you creepy.

I am not talking about acting on it. that's a different story with many variables. Just feeling it.

Stating that means that, yes, you WANT to act on it, and that you WANT to know that they are 12 years old (or younger), and that you would be ECSTATIC if they were...and don't get ME started on what you mean by "feeling it"...

I don't have to ask to know ONE thing... Doctor_J is a sick, creepy, pedophile, which is ACTUALLY the ONLY thing worse than being a DUmmie.

[GOBUCKS]

Thu Sep 12, 2013, 05:10 PM
Doctor_J (27,301 posts)

How old must a female be so that finding her sexually attractive is
Not pedophilic?

Not creepy?

Well, damn. I had to go back to the OP to find out that DUmmy Doctor_J has over twenty-seven thousand posts.

I was hoping that he might be a sock puppet for Creepy Steve in Bellevue or the Creepy Alcoholic Pitt up there in Rindge, NH.

They both have well-documented illegal attractions.

[I_B_Perky]

Doctor_J

How old must a female be so that finding her sexually attractive is
 
Not pedophilic?

Not creepy?

I am not talking about acting on it. that's a different story with many variables. Just feeling it.

I think I speak for a whole lot of people everywhere when I say this:  "Please off yourself in a most grotesque manner as soon as possible, pedo!"

[diesel driver]

I think I speak for a whole lot of people everywhere when I say this:  "Please off yourself in a most grotesque manner as soon as possible, pedo!"

Absolutely!

May his demise be as glorious as it would be painful and enduring.  (I'm thinking setting himself on fire would make for a very noticeable demise!)   

[Mr Mannn]

Hmmm. Post removed. Was it removed before or after we started discussing it here?

Of course the deviancy is acceptable at DU, you just don't talk about it openly. Its best use if to bash their enemies with it. When the socialists win, nothing will be denied the elites.

[BlueStateSaint]

Well, damn. I had to go back to the OP to find out that DUmmy Doctor_J has over twenty-seven thousand posts.

I was hoping that he might be a sock puppet for Creepy Steve in Bellevue or the Creepy Alcoholic Pitt up there in Rindge, NH.

They both have well-documented illegal attractions.

And the Pittstain lost a job over his.

[I_B_Perky]

Absolutely!

May his demise be as glorious as it would be painful and enduring.  (I'm thinking setting himself on fire would make for a very noticeable demise!)   

Especially if he would do it one limb at a time.   

Pedo's disgust me, DD. They are rabid predators that don't change. The stats on pedo stuff tell me they cannot be rehabbed so I say give the parents of the victim the choice of how the pedo dies.


Hell make it a lottery for that matter and let people choose the manner of death for 5 bucks a ticket.  Give the winning submission half the money and the victim's family the other half. Do it on national TV.

[DumbAss Tanker]

Actual paedophilia is the attraction to pre-sexual features or sexually-immature features of another person.  Noticing developed sexual features on someone who is not old enough to consent to sex is a lot of things, including an express ticket to jail for any act or word toward that end, with or without a beatdown, and (Depending on the age and other features of the person) still pretty likely creepy, but it isn't paedophilia.  It's a term that is heavily misused and means something pretty different than most people on the internet think.

[RobJohnson]

Interesting...

Doctor_J (27,308 posts)

33. Yeah, that seems like a decent rule of thumb.

Last edited Fri Sep 13, 2013, 07:46 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

I am old and monogamous and have been as such for decades (monogamous, not old). In fact I have dropped a couple of friends due to their cheating on their wives, who were also friends. I also knew a HS teacher/coach who was a serial dater of his former students. He would usually wait until they were 2 years removed from HS to date them (around 20-21). He was still doing this well into his 40's. I thought that was pretty, er, unseemly, and talked to each of my daughters about him when they were attending that HS. So it's not my style, but being somewhat of a keep-to-myself person (actually quite straight-laced in my own life - liberal when it comes to other's lives) I figured, well, it's his thing, and everyone is of the age of consent, so...?

I didn't anticipate the onslaught from the other group, and can't fathom what this has to do with MRA, but like I say I am pretty open-minded wrt what other do with their private lives.

Apparently I have opened myself up to accusations of perviness just by bring up the subject of May-December lust (or March-October). C'est la guerre

 

Response to Doctor_J (Reply #33)

Fri Sep 13, 2013, 07:57 PM

Star Member Warren DeMontague (48,289 posts)

34. Okay, so since you're here, you should understand that asking that question in ANY form

leaves the door open to accusations of creepiness.

I mean, the shitstorm was entirely predictable- right up to the combination of yowling outrage over remonstrations that people should have made to you but didn't, or didn't quickly enough, along with the flagrant just making shit up out of whole cloth and then pretending as if they were things people actually said in response... (an old favorite)

but that said, we have concepts like "consenting adults" for a reason, as much as some love to pretend that any adult who does stuff that pisses them off or they don't agree with, deserves to be treated like a child with no agency who can't possibly consent.

You would do well to make it extra clear in the future when you're asking these sorts of questions, that you're clearly talking about consenting adults and not trying to justify or make some sideways argument for child abuse.

 

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #34)

Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:28 PM

Star Member Doctor_J (27,308 posts)

35. Thanks

I was absolutely NOT making any argument, implied or otherwise, for child abuse. I was thinking more of the Seinfeld-Soshana situation - creepy? Lucky bastard? Good for him, not my thing? What about Michael & Catherine? Murphy Jones and Emma?

Sorry, members of HoF and Feminists. I was not condoning and would not condone or suggest pedophilia. I was mostly just wondering aloud on a pretty free-thinking site what are the bounds of acceptable/normal physical relationships. I am a lifelong feminist, husband of feminist, father of feminists. Apologies for the crude approach to what I intended to be a discussion point for seasoned, sane, healthy men. If you would like the OP deleted to clear out the stench, say the word and it will be gone

.
 

Response to Doctor_J (Reply #35)

Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:43 PM

Star Member Warren DeMontague (48,289 posts)

36. If you dont self delete, it will be a topic for probably 3+ months.

If you do self-delete it, you might be able to cut that down to two.

Piece of advice? If you do, make sure you copy the EXACT text of the OP into a reply first, so no one can later on try to act like it said something specific that it did not.


Not that anyone here would ever do such a thing

 

[Skul]

Pedo looking for justification at the DUmp.
Figures.

[Big Dog]

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #34)

Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:28 PM

Star Member Doctor_J (27,308 posts)

35. Thanks

I was absolutely NOT making any argument, implied or otherwise, for child abuse. I was thinking more of the Seinfeld-Soshana situation - creepy? Lucky bastard? Good for him, not my thing? What about Michael & Catherine? Murphy Jones and Emma?

Sorry, members of HoF and Feminists.

The DUmmy prostrates himself before the feministas and fem-men, but it's too late. The DUmp outrage is growing, like a yeast infection...

I was not condoning and would not condone or suggest pedophilia.

You just lost Will "If She's Old Enough to Walk to the Store, She's Old Enough to Get Bred" Pitt.

I was mostly just wondering aloud on a pretty free-thinking site what are the bounds of acceptable/normal physical relationships.

What? Are you talking about the DUmp?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
(pant, pant)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I am a lifelong feminist, husband of feminist, father of feminists.

This is for you, DUmmy:

Apologies for the crude approach to what I intended to be a discussion point for seasoned, sane, healthy men.

What? At the DUmp?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
(pant, pant)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

If you would like the OP deleted to clear out the stench, say the word and it will be gone

Foolish, foolish DUmmy. It's not gone. Like that sore on 'The Disappointer" that keeps coming back, you'll be seeing it again.

The Internet is forever.

[Vagabond]

[youtube=425,350]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvZgwtpPmLY[/youtube]

[Ralph Wiggum]

So, who is going to alert the authorities on this ass-clown?

[GOP Congress]

Let's bottom line this.

I was in the 82nd Airborne Divison in the late 70's through early 80's, at time when the military had the "longest" hair. It was normal for black guys to pack their 'fro, for instance, and even white guys heavily gelled their hair to **barely** legal length. Some even got haircuts three times a week because they didn't want to be over the limit.

Well, at least that was what it was like for "legs."

Our commanding general would have NONE of that crap. Airborne, rangers, and Special forces were a cut above, and the general made damn sure anyone who's hair broke regulation got an Article 15. NO "get that shit cut now" beforehand, you got nailed.

OK, long story. The bottom line: "If you think you are close to needing a haircut, you NEED a haircut." That was the clear-cut line, the boundary, no ambiguity, clearly black/white with no room for wiggleness.

If I were Doctor J, I'd make DAMN sure I knew who my friends were and checked the Internet very closely. Doug Bulna only lost his job. This is worse.

Same for Doctor_J. If you have to "wonder" or "ask" if someone is old enough, 1) Mentally, your wires are screwed up (well, they were already screwed up for the DUmp, but I digress), and 2. YOU ARE A ****ING PEDO. No ifs, ands, or buts.

This is one of those things in life that can NOT be "debated" or "bring enlightenment to." Frankly, anyone under 30 looks like a freakin' junior high school kid (way before "middle" school became in vogue), but that's just me. Mostly it's because most kids under 30, unless they are military, ER, LE, firefighter, or a married parent, have no real clue to life.

And to wonder about what age to get a woodie over a kid, well, that makes you a pedo, even if you "deny" it all the time.

[diesel driver]

Especially if he would do it one limb at a time.   

Pedo's disgust me, DD. They are rabid predators that don't change. The stats on pedo stuff tell me they cannot be rehabbed so I say give the parents of the victim the choice of how the pedo dies.


Hell make it a lottery for that matter and let people choose the manner of death for 5 bucks a ticket.  Give the winning submission half the money and the victim's family the other half. Do it on national TV.

I have a cousin with the VSP (Virginia State Police) who works in their Sexual Offender Registry division, keeping track of these deviants.

He and every trooper I speak to tells me that department is SEVERELY overworked!

As a mailman, I deliver many of the tracking letters to "customers", and most are just what you would expect them to be or look like.  A lot of our female carriers call in "sick" when these letters show up.

I'd just as soon douse them in diesel fuel and push them into an active volcano.   

[Revolution]

That thread that was brought here disgusts me to no end. Anyone who is even having fleeting thoughts about children should be put to death in the most painful way possible! Sick freaks.

[RobJohnson]

That thread that was brought here disgusts me to no end. Anyone who is even having fleeting thoughts about children should be put to death in the most painful way possible! Sick freaks.

Most people on DU are sick, just in different ways. Some worse then others, as this guy proved.

[vesta111]

Most people on DU are sick, just in different ways. Some worse then others, as this guy proved.

Sounds to me that this dude may have all ready acted on impulse and trying to justify his actions. 

What on earth would any married  man have in common with a female  under 10 years his age if it was not just sex ??  Asking about age of consent is a good tip off, This man is not asking about a woman over the age of 18.

Then there is the fact he mentions having a wife and daughters, so why ask these questions of others and not his own family ?     This man must be attracted to a female so young he is worried about getting caught.     

Following this line of reasoning, it could get much darker as we know from the news with the teenager kidnapped by a family friend last month.   

I hope DU keeps him talking with no disgust at him.   More he reveals about himself the easier to catch him as CC caught Doug who was just an idiot-----This guy sounds dangerous.

[BannedFromDU]

Sounds to me that this dude may have all ready acted on impulse and trying to justify his actions. 

     It's probably worse than that - he's probably done it far more than once. He IS right about one thing: DU IS home to all manner of sexual deviants and those who forgive their behavior. Anyone remember the thread about whether they have sex with kids in the room?

     Notice that the advice the OP got was more aligned with not getting busted than with the underlying mental illness. DU is a freakish crapstorm of addicts, weirdos, deviants, and perverts, so that guy is right at home.

     And he should be wallduded, Cali'd, and Bulna'd. Badly.

[Big Dog]

Sounds to me that this dude may have all ready acted on impulse and trying to justify his actions. 

What on earth would any married  man have in common with a female  under 10 years his age if it was not just sex ??  Asking about age of consent is a good tip off, This man is not asking about a woman over the age of 18.

Then there is the fact he mentions having a wife and daughters, so why ask these questions of others and not his own family ?     This man must be attracted to a female so young he is worried about getting caught.     

Following this line of reasoning, it could get much darker as we know from the news with the teenager kidnapped by a family friend last month.   

I hope DU keeps him talking with no disgust at him.   More he reveals about himself the easier to catch him as CC caught Doug who was just an idiot-----This guy sounds dangerous.

I think you nailed it, vesta. High five.

[Freeper]

I seem to recall recently they were debating that the age of 18 is only an arbitrary number. I forget whether the context was for sexual activity or not, but knowing the DUmmies it probably was.