Freeper, I still don't understand what a WAR CRIME is or who should pass judgement on the perpetrators
Out of curiosity who and when did the winners in a war begin to judge the conduct of civilians or military of the opponent in any time of war.? OR the actions taken in self defence on the winners side.? OR the treatment the loosing side gave to their own people.?
I can see trying people that become traitors to ones country in war or any other time. However how can we give a Man/woman a weapon, point out a target give them orders to kill everyone, then court marshal the soldier for living a few alive'
Sounds like how Saul got into trouble with God way back then.
For 6 years (since we went to war in Iraq) the DUmmies have been accusing Bush, Cheney, Rove etc of war crimes. So when Obama is fighting the same wars that Bush was they should be considered war crimes by the DUmmies as well. But, since they are not that shows they didn't oppose the war they opposed Bush.
I think you are confused and thinking I am suggesting that what Obama is doing is war crimes I am not. I am pointing out how they changed their tune at DUmmyland.
And its court martial not marshal.