« on: March 06, 2010, 11:04:17 PM »
The harsh verdict on the state of the NHS, after a spending splurge under Labour between 2000 and 2008, raises worrying questions about the future quality of the health service as budgets are squeezed.
One report, based on the advice of almost 200 top managers and doctors, says hospitals ignored basic hygiene to cram in patients to meet waiting-time targets.
It says “several interviewees†cited the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells [NHS Trust in Kent where 269 deaths during 2005-6 were caused by infection with Clostridium difficile bacteria].
There were subsequent failings at health trusts in Basildon in Essex, and Mid Staffordshire. Filthy wards and nurse shortages led to up to 1,200 deaths at Stafford hospital.
One heading in the report says: “The patient doesn’t seem to be in the picture.†It adds: “We were struck by the virtual absence of mention of patients and families ... whether we were discussing aims and ambition for improvement, measurement of progress or any other topic relevant to quality.
“Most targets and standards appear to be defined in professional, organisational and political terms, not in terms of patients’ experience of care.â€
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article7052606.eceNope. Nothing wrong with government-run healthcare. Not a thing. Carry on, nothing to see here.
Logged
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.