Author Topic: Chaos in the white house  (Read 3953 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2010, 06:18:09 PM »
Ooooh!!!! Bookmarked!!!! :-)

the white house mole, not the guy being interviewed, but the guy that he is talking to, has got to be rahm emanuel.  ratting out an administration to make yourself look better is SOP for him.  plus, he is a clintonite, and the clintons are still seething with indignation because hillary was deprived of the oval office because of this upstart.

 

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2010, 07:35:18 PM »
yeah I tend to think it's Rahm too W.E.

Juicy!!!!
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2010, 07:37:28 PM »
Even if true, the majority of Americans will never see or hear about it. The Obamaphiles won't care.
That is very true. They just want their free money and pony too!

Offline SoCalLady

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 4
  • Reputation: +4/-0
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2010, 09:50:13 PM »
I didn't read the whole thing. . . but it was quite interesting.   I told you guys I was an MD, but I didn't tell you my speciality and it is. . .  Psychiatry!

There is no way Obama has schizophrenia.  Sorry, just not possible.

Now, he could have a severe depression.  Very severely depressed people can get psychotic as part of the depression.  The thing is, it's really pretty treatable.  You have to add an antipsychotic med to the anti-depressant, but the new ones are have really low side effects and are quite effective.  It would really only take, at worst, a few months for the guy to get better.  Maybe not 100%, but better.  So why would you remove him from office as opposed to treating him?  I just don't see this working. . . if anyone is really trying for this it's going to fail. 

I rarely look at any video with Obama in it (gives me depression) but I'll see if I can find some of him where he's not on the teleprompter and try to see if I see any signs of depression in his speech or body language.

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2010, 10:42:42 PM »
I didn't read the whole thing. . . but it was quite interesting.   I told you guys I was an MD, but I didn't tell you my speciality and it is. . .  Psychiatry!

There is no way Obama has schizophrenia.  Sorry, just not possible.

Now, he could have a severe depression.  Very severely depressed people can get psychotic as part of the depression.  The thing is, it's really pretty treatable.  You have to add an antipsychotic med to the anti-depressant, but the new ones are have really low side effects and are quite effective.  It would really only take, at worst, a few months for the guy to get better.  Maybe not 100%, but better.  So why would you remove him from office as opposed to treating him?  I just don't see this working. . . if anyone is really trying for this it's going to fail. 

I rarely look at any video with Obama in it (gives me depression) but I'll see if I can find some of him where he's not on the teleprompter and try to see if I see any signs of depression in his speech or body language.

I have a ton of friends in the "dispense zoloft" industry.

I think that your whole brand of science is crap.

Offline SoCalLady

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 4
  • Reputation: +4/-0
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2010, 11:02:02 PM »

I think that your whole brand of science is crap.

That's nice.  And your point is. . . . ?

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2010, 11:13:07 PM »
I think that your whole brand of science is crap.

That's nice.  And your point is. . . . ?

perhaps we went awry at "your brand of science.  but perhaps not.

do you wish to prove that your "brand" of alleged science actually
adheres to the scientific method?

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +362/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2010, 11:43:33 PM »
I don't believe in "psychiatry", either. It's akin to Glow-Bull Warming....
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline LC EFA

  • Hickus Australianus
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4527
  • Reputation: +414/-33
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #33 on: October 30, 2010, 03:00:31 AM »
Quote
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

Source

Translation -

If (Obama's Cronies) should all get together and declare (Obama) unable to discharge the duties of the office then (Biden) is assigned Acting President.

After then

If (Obama) tells (obama's Cronies) that he's actually fit to perform his duties (obama) resumes his duties unless (obama's cronies) disagree. ONLY should that happen does congress get to decide and only with a 2/3rds majority.

Likely outcome in the present tense even if Obama's cronies can be persuaded to turn coat - you get Biden, or have I erred in my interpretation here ?.

Is Biden really any improvement ?

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #34 on: October 30, 2010, 03:05:46 AM »
You have to add an antipsychotic med to the anti-depressant, ....then suck a bong...drink a little liquor... have a cup of coffee and a cigarette....pop an upper....a downer....a pain pill or 2....and WAA-LAA all better and normal again.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #35 on: October 30, 2010, 04:11:09 PM »
Now, he could have a severe depression.  Very severely depressed people can get psychotic as part of the depression.  The thing is, it's really pretty treatable.  You have to add an antipsychotic med to the anti-depressant, but the new ones are have really low side effects and are quite effective.  It would really only take, at worst, a few months for the guy to get better.  Maybe not 100%, but better.  So why would you remove him from office as opposed to treating him?  I just don't see this working. . . if anyone is really trying for this it's going to fail
W.T.F?!?! Treat him? I want him to stop occupying the White House and vote a REAL leader in there. Treat him, really?! :fuelfire:

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #36 on: October 30, 2010, 04:20:01 PM »
the white house mole, not the guy being interviewed, but the guy that he is talking to, has got to be rahm emanuel.  ratting out an administration to make yourself look better is SOP for him.  plus, he is a clintonite, and the clintons are still seething with indignation because hillary was deprived of the oval office because of this upstart.

 

Yeah, a little too much blather about the short-fused "campaign". He didn't say for the mayorship of Chicago, but that's gotta be what it is. My money's on Rahm.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline 5412

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2062
  • Reputation: +220/-78
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #37 on: October 30, 2010, 08:32:03 PM »
Translation -

If (Obama's Cronies) should all get together and declare (Obama) unable to discharge the duties of the office then (Biden) is assigned Acting President.

After then

If (Obama) tells (obama's Cronies) that he's actually fit to perform his duties (obama) resumes his duties unless (obama's cronies) disagree. ONLY should that happen does congress get to decide and only with a 2/3rds majority.

Likely outcome in the present tense even if Obama's cronies can be persuaded to turn coat - you get Biden, or have I erred in my interpretation here ?.

Is Biden really any improvement ?


Hi,

I lived through the Nixon and Agnew resignations.  Now mind you it was a different world back then but a crisis was indeed avoided.  Congress got together and Gerald Ford became acting president because congress realized he had the moral authority to lead. 

Putting Pelosi, (who is likely the most unpopular politician on the planet), or Biden who is likely right behind her, in the white house would cause one hell of a crisis.  Somehow a leader would have to emerge.........  Christ, what am I saying.  While Hillary might want the job if BO got bounced before his term is over, Bill Clinton could actually get the job to steward until the next election. 

While the Constitution says one thing, there still is an issue with moral authority to lead.  BO had it when he got elected and it is now totally gone, just look at the polls. 

If I were to guess, this crap will start hitting the fan in 2011 and they will drag it out until folks say it is only a few more months, just leave BO there as a lame duck idiot which he is already anyway.

regards,
5412

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #38 on: October 30, 2010, 08:36:50 PM »
he was a chicago machine politico.  and he kissed ass for years as he tried to climb the ladder.  there is no way there isn't anything there.