Author Topic: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"  (Read 8009 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Splashdown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6729
  • Reputation: +475/-100
  • Out of 9 lives, I spent 7
Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« on: October 27, 2009, 10:33:07 AM »
Quote
Gingrich calls GOP support for Hoffman a 'purge'
By Jordan Fabian - 10/27/09 09:47 AM ET
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) late Monday had some choice words for Republicans supporting Conservative Party party candidate Doug Hoffman (N.Y.), accusing them of conducting a "purge" of the GOP.

Many national Republican figures, such as Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.) and ex-Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska), have backed Hoffman over GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava in the 23rd district's special election this year. The district has been long-held by Republicans, but many conservatives have shied away from Scozzafava for her socially liberal positions and the local GOP's selection process that they say was not transparent.


...

Gingrich also attacked Hoffman for not having proper knowledge of local issues and living outside the 23rd district.


"So I say to my many conservative friends who suddenly decided whether they're from Minnesota, or Alaska, or Texas, they know more than the upstate New York Republicans? I don't think so," he added.


The Hill

Um, we NEED to purge Republicans who want to raise taxes and who are approved by Kos and ACORN.
Let nothing trouble you,
Let nothing frighten you. 
All things are passing;
God never changes.
Patience attains all that it strives for.
He who has God lacks nothing:
God alone suffices.
--St. Theresa of Avila



"No crushed ice; no peas." -- Undies

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2009, 10:38:29 AM »
While all this bickering and backstabbing goes on, the Democrats gleefully watch the bloodletting and further plan the demise of this country.

Maybe that is what is supposed to happen. Maybe this country is supposed to fall in the toilet like a hanging turd.

The Republican party is no longer what it says it was. In their effort to appeal to everyone, they appeal to only those who somehow can't swap spit with the Dems but wind up getting screwed by them anyway.

Where's the freakin' leadership?

Steele, you've got your head up your ass.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline bkg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Reputation: +4/-15
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2009, 10:41:04 AM »
Newt just lost all of my support.

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2009, 10:49:24 AM »
Has anyone suggested Newt be checked for bleeding on the brain?  It can happen to anybody and the only evident symptom can be subtle irrationality.  

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1278/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2009, 10:56:51 AM »
C'mon, Newt was as bad as any of them.  He talked a good game in 1994 with the Contract With America, but when he caved to Clinton's pressure during the fed shutdown, he showed his spine wasn't as much steel as Twinkies.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2009, 10:57:12 AM »
Has anyone suggested Newt be checked for bleeding on the brain?  It can happen to anybody and the only evident symptom can be subtle irrationality.  

It's either that or recurring gas.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Rebel

  • Stick a fork in us. We're done.
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16768
  • Reputation: +1239/-215
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2009, 10:59:44 AM »
This, "You need to support a person just because he has an R behind his or her name" is the reason the Republican party is full of RINOs. No one is keeping them in check. They vote for anyone with an R because people like Newt scare them to believe that if they don't, they'll essentially be giving the Dem the election.

I'm not a Republican, but damn that. I'd rather see a scorched Earth reboot than participate in moving this country further and further to the left. It's 1 step forward, 2 steps back as it stands now. If liberal Republicans want to be liberals, they need to join a damn liberal party. This is why I'm not a member of any party.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline Chump

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2009, 11:00:21 AM »
Hey Newt!  It is a purge, and a much-need and long overdue one at that!

I won't purport to know more about local politics than upstate New York conservatives, but...uh...you certainly are...

Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.   ~Robert A. Heinlein

...let the cannibal who snarls that the freedom of man's mind was needed to create an industrial civilization, but is not needed to maintain it, be given an arrowhead and bearskin, not a university chair of economics.
~Atlas Shrugged, Galt's speech

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2009, 11:07:12 AM »
C'mon, Newt was as bad as any of them.  He talked a good game in 1994 with the Contract With America, but when he caved to Clinton's pressure during the fed shutdown, he showed his spine wasn't as much steel as Twinkies.

I agree.  Newt was never a prize.  But it seems he is more irrational now.  He's "statements" don't just go against the grain - the are downright odd.  Even for him.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1707/-151
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2009, 11:08:18 AM »
C'mon, Newt was as bad as any of them.  He talked a good game in 1994 with the Contract With America, but when he caved to Clinton's pressure during the fed shutdown, he showed his spine wasn't as much steel as Twinkies.

He grossly overplayed his hand then, and his judgment hasn't imporved since.  He is intellectually smart, but has a record for poor political judgment, because he also thinks he is very intellectually smart and it makes him an arrogant bloviator.  And I'm pretty sure my opinion of his smarts is not nearly as high as his own opinion of his smarts.

Really he was sort of a GOP counterpart to San Fran Nan, reflecting the peculiarities of the House...you really only have to understand your own district and keep getting re-elected long enough to become so senior that you have committee appointments that bring home the bacon, after that your further re-election is assured until you decide to retire.  At some point you will be so senior that if your party ever gets into power again, you will be a leading candidate for Speaker.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Ree

  • It's Ree...
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1963
  • Reputation: +110/-42
  • 100+ pounds lighter.. Ain't I hot
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2009, 11:12:37 AM »
Newt got that old-timers disease?







I think this just shows how outaa touch with "real people" the Repubs are....
In Tennessee. I came down here to get warm,froze my arse off since I got here..
Just my luck... ;-P

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2009, 11:24:47 AM »
This discussion about Newt, San Fran Nan, and the Speaker of the House gig reminds me of Gerald Ford.

All he ever wanted to be was Speaker. And he became president due to Nixon's downfall, the only president not to have been elected to that office.

Say whatcha want about Gerry Ford - he wasn't as klutzy as the media made him out to be, and he wasn't an idiot, either. Or a whacko.

He took a stand that cost him being elected in his own right - pardoning Nixon of any illegalities he might've had committed.

While doing so was political suicide, the fact he did it and did so gracefully, after suitable contemplation, speaks well of him, I think.

When did the Speaker gig turn ugly? Tip O'Neill? Maybe - he and Reagan went round and round, though they were buddies in real life, IIRC. Jim Wright? Yeah, there's an ethics scandal right there.

Tom Foley? Again, if I recall, he lost his Speaker gig when he lost his representative election. How dumb is that?

Maybe Ford was the last, real, Speaker-who-never-was.  :clueless:
« Last Edit: October 27, 2009, 11:26:22 AM by Eupher »
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
  • Reputation: +2233/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2009, 12:24:11 PM »
Purging is medically indicated when ingesting poison.

Break-out the activated charcoal powder and stomach pump. It won't be pleasant but it may be the only way to save our lives.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline ColonialMarine0431

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
  • Reputation: +167/-18
  • DEUS VULT
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2009, 01:10:37 PM »
Purge. Putsch. Coup. Whatever Newt wants to call it is fine with me. And it's LONG overdue.

I'll See Your Jihad and Raise You One Crusade

Offline Chump

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2009, 01:21:00 PM »
Purge. Putsch. Coup. Whatever Newt wants to call it is fine with me. And it's LONG overdue.



I'm gonna need to find that one.

I'm not a bumper sticker kinda guy, but I'll put that on the ol' truck for sure.
Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.   ~Robert A. Heinlein

...let the cannibal who snarls that the freedom of man's mind was needed to create an industrial civilization, but is not needed to maintain it, be given an arrowhead and bearskin, not a university chair of economics.
~Atlas Shrugged, Galt's speech

Offline ColonialMarine0431

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
  • Reputation: +167/-18
  • DEUS VULT
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #15 on: October 27, 2009, 01:30:57 PM »
Chump, I came across that on a blog http://blogs.rep-am.com/worth_reading/?tag=government-spending but I haven't seen any for sale yet.
I'll See Your Jihad and Raise You One Crusade

Offline Lacarnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4154
  • Reputation: +316/-315
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #16 on: October 27, 2009, 03:30:05 PM »
Purging Repubs and Democrats is exactly what we need. Sooner the better or this country will not be fit to live in.

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #17 on: October 27, 2009, 07:18:36 PM »
Hey Newt...  A full purge is exactly what real conservatives need to do with the GOP.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Duke Nukum

  • Assistant Chair of the Committee on Neighborhood Services
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8015
  • Reputation: +561/-202
  • O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #18 on: October 27, 2009, 07:30:26 PM »
Newt just lost all of my support.
He lost mine a long time ago.

He's like one of these tragi-comic anti-heroes who is in love with his own intellect but his intellect is unfaithful to him and leads him to be unfaithful to everyone around him, wives, constituents, fans, etc.

From marital infidelity to "green conservatism" to sitting on a couch with "Stretch" Pelosi to this thing in New York.  It is one pratfall after the next with only those he is responsible to taking the hit.
“A man who has been through bitter experiences and travelled far enjoys even his sufferings after a time”
― Homer, The Odyssey

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #19 on: October 27, 2009, 08:13:53 PM »
This, "You need to support a person just because he has an R behind his or her name" is the reason the Republican party is full of RINOs. No one is keeping them in check. They vote for anyone with an R because people like Newt scare them to believe that if they don't, they'll essentially be giving the Dem the election.

I'm not a Republican, but damn that. I'd rather see a scorched Earth reboot than participate in moving this country further and further to the left. It's 1 step forward, 2 steps back as it stands now. If liberal Republicans want to be liberals, they need to join a damn liberal party. This is why I'm not a member of any party.

IMHO these are probably bandwagon riders who switched to R during the Reagan Revolution to ensure they kept getting elected...but never gave up their Lib underpinnings.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline RightCoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3438
  • Reputation: +185/-24
  • Semper Fi means more than most will ever know
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #20 on: October 27, 2009, 08:41:17 PM »
Newt is more concerned with his books and his tv face-time then he is with winning conservative seats.
nine eleven is a car
nine one one is an emergency service
September 11, 2001 was an attack
Never Forget, or Minimize.

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2009, 08:57:10 PM »
IMHO these are probably bandwagon riders who switched to R during the Reagan Revolution to ensure they kept getting elected...but never gave up their Lib underpinnings.

I won't argue against that.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #22 on: October 27, 2009, 11:05:23 PM »
IMHO these are probably bandwagon riders who switched to R during the Reagan Revolution to ensure they kept getting elected...but never gave up their Lib underpinnings.

Hell, we don't even have to go back as far as Reagan.  Just in the the aftermath of the 1994 liberal slapdown, we saw a couple of senators and a whole piss pot full of "moderate demonrat" congress critters change their registered affiliation in order to stay on the power band wagon.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #23 on: October 27, 2009, 11:15:44 PM »
I would like to see Palin as a catalyst for a third party, and I think she might be the person to pull it off.  Look at the effect she's had on Hoffman's campaign; he's now leading the other two candidates by double digits and the DNCC is sending out emails pleading for money.

I suppose a shift in the Republican Party may be too much to ask.  I could accept Steele's endorsement of Scozzafava... it is his job to support Republicans and not independent candidates.  The  moderate don't like Palin and the post-campaign trash talk from McCain's staffers makes that obvious enough.  I'm ready to wash my hands of the GOP... I have no use for them.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2009, 11:17:27 PM by Chris »
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Gingrich: Support for Hoffman a "Purge"
« Reply #24 on: October 28, 2009, 07:05:50 AM »
I could accept Steele's endorsement of Scozzafava... it is his job to support Republicans and not independent candidates.

A problem I have is that the GOP is spending money on attacking Hoffman.