Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
EXCLUSIVE: EPA Ponders Expanded Regulatory Power In Name of 'Sustainable Development'By George RussellPublished December 19, 2011FoxNews.comReuters/FileThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency wants to change how it analyzes problems and makes decisions, in a way that would give it vastly expanded power to regulate businesses, communities and ecosystems in the name of “sustainable development,†the centerpiece of a global United Nations conference slated for Rio de Janeiro next June.The major focus of the EPA thinking is a weighty study the agency commissioned last year from the National Academies of Science. Published in August, the study, entitled “Sustainability and the U.S. EPA,†cost nearly $700,000 and involved a team of a dozen outside experts and about half as many National Academies staff.Its aim: how to integrate sustainability “as one of the key drivers within the regulatory responsibilities of EPA.†The panel who wrote the study declares part of its job to be “providing guidance to EPA on how it might implement its existing statutory authority to contribute more fully to a more sustainable-development trajectory for the United States.â€Or, in other words, how to use existing laws to new ends.According to the Academies, the sustainability study “both incorporates and goes beyond an approach based on assessing and managing the risks posed by pollutants that has largely shaped environmental policy since the 1980s.â€It is already known in EPA circles as the “Green Book,†and is frequently compared by insiders to the “Red Book,†a study on using risk management techniques to guide evaluation of carcinogenic chemicals that the agency touts as the basis of its overall approach to environmental issues for the past 30 years.At the time that the “Green Book†study was commissioned, in August, 2010, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson termed it “the next phase of environmental protection,†and asserted that it will be “fundamental to the future of the EPA.â€Jackson compared the new approach, it would articulate to “the difference between treating disease and pursuing wellness.†It was, she said, “a new opportunity to show how environmentally protective and sustainable we can be,†and would affect “every aspect†of EPA’s work.