The point is: taking melting glaciers, hoisting them in the air and yelling, "See! See! Mankind is doing this! Now hand over your economy and your laws!" is no longer viable. You need to lok at something other than glaciers to frighten us with your little bogey man stories.
Straight up, guy... Why do you keep arguing that an article which contains a claim that volcanoes are contributing to, not causing, glacial melting somehow disproves the claim that mankind is the primary cause of climate change? I just don't understand your reasoning.
Now go find us evidence of anthropogenic global warming that does not involve melting glaciers.
You haven't provided a shred of evidence to prove the idea that glacial melting is entirely the result of natural processes so don't ask me to accept that idea as the premise for further discussion.
The fact that volcanoes and other natural forces are contributing to global warming does not disprove the idea that human activities are the primary cause or a significant cause of global warming. I don't know how to put it more simply than that.
The article mentioned the oceans. Why not try to tell us why the oceans are getting warmer (or as was alluded to earlier: perhaps they're returning to normal temperatures after a cool-down cycle)?
I haven't discussed the cause of rising ocean temperatures because my goal in this thread is to disabuse you of the notion that the article this thread is about contains evidence that mankind is not the cause of global warming or for that matter glacial melting.