Keep in mind the libs idea of "childishly defensive" is not admitting to be what they claim you are.
What the Laelth's of the world can't seem to grasp is that I find the words of those to whom his comrades listen (like Olbermann, Maddow, Malloy, etc...) to be hatefilled rhetoric that is being said to incite violence against those of who they disagree. So when Olbermann did "The Worst Person In The World" segment, who's to say that someone who agreed with him wouldn't hear that as a calling to rid the world of this "worst" person? And yet him and libs in general, completely ignore this, or act as though it isn't equivalent.
If he truly believes as he claims, then the responsible thing for him to have done would have been to call upon his lib opinion commentators to not say anything that might even have remotely caused someone to act out what they believed the commentator was asking. But did he? No.
You see, when Dear Leader said "they bring a knife, we bring a gun," or when Palin used crosshairs to ID targets for political office, did I take either of those as saying they wanted someone to go out and committ murder? No, I didn't. But then again, I'm normal and not a kook like Laelth. To make matters worse, he views one as being "violent rhetoric" and the other he doesn't even mention. If he wants Republicans to step up because they're the only one's who can tone down the rhetoric at this time, then he's overlooking the responsibility of the Democrats at this time to actually get the ball rolling by saying "When Dear Leader said "knife, gun," and B, and C, and D, etc..., we condemn him for this, and we call upon R's to do that with those who support them." But will he call on that?
.