Author Topic: Experts' Eye 100% Unverifiable E-Vote System in 'Win' of SC's Mystery U.S. Senat (Read 1927 times)

sofa king · « **on:** June 13, 2010, 12:12:11 AM »

don't you just love the dummys.

this perfectly fine fellow, admittedly not the brightest bulb of the lot, but the winner in the sc democrat primary, is now the subject to their wrath. i have heard him talk. he sounds like a dummy to me, politically speaking.

but now the dummys are looking, again, for that evil that haunts all of their everyday existence...

when things don't go right for them? voter fraud. (which is actually pretty funny, because when things do go right? it's usually voter fraud on their part!)

anyhoo... i brought this one over because it is particularly boring in dummyland tonight...

Quote

BradBlog (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-11-10 05:04 PM
Original message

Experts' Eye 100% Unverifiable E-Vote System in 'Win' of SC's Mystery U.S. Senate Nominee

Source: BRAD BLOG

'Experts' Eye 100% Unverifiable E-Vote System in 'Win' of SC's Mystery U.S. Senate Nominee
'Staggering' disparities seen between Alvin Greene's Election Day touch-screen results and paper-based absentee vote
Will corporate MSM have courage to 'go there'?...

Nobody in the South Carolina Democratic Party had ever heard of Alvin Greene, the jobless candidate for the Democratic U.S. Senate nomination, before he reportedly defeated the well-known state legislator Vic Rawl last Tuesday. That, despite the jobless candidate's lack of actual campaigning, or even spending any noteworthy money on his campaign. And there remain questions at this hour, as to where he even came up with the $10,000 filing fee to get on the ballot in the first place. Greene's interview on MSNBC last night is one of the most bizarre ever seen on television (full video posted at end of article).

Unless something changes between now and November, however, Greene's inexplicable victory will pit him against the state's often-controversial, and far-Rightwing Republican incumbent Sen. Jim DeMint.

But where some have suggested Greene was a "plant" in the race, experts now examining the actual election result data from both SC's unverifiable Election Day touch-screen machines and its electronically counted paper-ballot absentee vote system are noting "curious" and even "staggering" disparities, suggesting what some Election Integrity experts describe at this hour as "clear signs of ELECTION FRAUD in South Carolina"...

FULL STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7890

Chris_ · « **Reply #1 on:** June 13, 2010, 12:36:48 AM »

I think the entire episode is hilariously funny. Either way it turns out, a Dem is a Dem is a Dem.

BlueStateSaint · « **Reply #2 on:** June 13, 2010, 04:56:29 AM »

So, let me get this straight--this DUchebag is citing his own story as proof of this?

JohnnyReb · « **Reply #3 on:** June 13, 2010, 07:10:31 AM »

Quote from: chris_ on June 13, 2010, 12:36:48 AM

I think the entire episode is hilariously funny. Either way it turns out, a Dem is a Dem is a Dem.

Yes it is....

It was a dem controlled election board that bought the machines.....and knowing S.C. Dem election stealing antics.....having it blow up in their face makes it funnier.

The article even mentions my home county. Greene got all the black vote plus a few white in a blue county of a red state...Greene, black, white, blue, red....now ain't that colorful.

They just can't bring themselves to believe that black churches instruct their members on who to vote for and that blacks "Block Vote" accordingly....just like back in the days of "Reconstruction" when southern legislatures were filled with the likes of Mr. Greene. by the carpetbaggers.

There were about 700,000 total votes cast in the Tuesday primary. About 450,000 in the republican primary and only about 250,000 in the democrat primary. Blacks make up over 60% of the democrat voters in SC....Mr. Greene got 59% of the dem vote. Apparently a few blacks have gotten off of Hillary's plantation.....maybe that's why the dem's are upset. They're not upset by such a poor candidate but that they're losing control of the "plantation".

ROCKURWORLD · « **Reply #4 on:** June 13, 2010, 08:06:03 AM »

You know black Americans will vote 90% of the time for the black candidate. The Dems have made them that way. It is sad but so true. Hell we had a black democrat running in my area that is a convicted felon and he got like 8000 actual votes int he county. He didn't win thank god but the fact that 8000 people actually voted for him is scary.

miskie · « **Reply #5 on:** June 13, 2010, 08:17:09 AM »

Sounds to me like a bunch of primitives are gettin' their racist on..

Apparently Greene is in the wrong, for campaigning while black according to the Democrats.

JohnnyReb · « **Reply #6 on:** June 13, 2010, 08:27:52 AM »

Quote from: miskie on June 13, 2010, 08:17:09 AM

Sounds to me like a bunch of primitives are gettin' their racist on..

Apparently Greene is in the wrong, for campaigning while black according to the Democrats.

Mr. Greene is a prime example of the southern black voter and small town predominately black office holder ....elected due solely due to his blackness. The democrats are embarrassed that he escaped the plantation and got into the national limelight.......

Hollywierd can't write this stuff......

NHSparky · « **Reply #7 on:** June 13, 2010, 09:10:26 AM »

It would be stating the obvious, but one could give him a shirt which says, "Typical Obama Voter" and see how the DUmp monkeys would react.

Then again, this guy is no better or worse qualified than Obama.

JohnnyReb · « **Reply #8 on:** June 13, 2010, 09:22:58 AM »

Quote from: NHSparky on June 13, 2010, 09:10:26 AM

It would be stating the obvious, but one could give him a shirt which says, "Typical Obama Voter" and see how the DUmp monkeys would react.

Then again, this guy is no better or worse qualified than Obama.

It won't happen but it would be nice if this brought back the days of the literacy test....when you had to demonstrate at least some competency. Maybe we could take it back to the days when you had to own property before you were allowed to vote.....OR SINCE WE'RE WISHING....one would have to present a tax return showing where they had actually held a job and paid income taxes.

Never happen because the dem candidates would get only two votes...theirs and their mistress....or domestic partner.

NHSparky · « **Reply #9 on:** June 13, 2010, 09:41:19 AM »

I saw Clyburn on CNN this morning saying he's convinced that Greene is a plant.

Okay, let's assume you are in fact correct, Congressman. The GOP paid for his filing fee. Now what? Did they campaign for him? Tell others to vote for him?

This is one of those times where I'd LOVE for you to investigate. You look even stupider than the voters who voted for this asshole.

miskie · « **Reply #10 on:** June 13, 2010, 10:14:04 AM »

Plant or not, he won. Deal with it, Democrats.

JohnnyReb · « **Reply #11 on:** June 13, 2010, 10:37:18 AM »

Quote from: NHSparky on June 13, 2010, 09:41:19 AM

I saw Clyburn on CNN this morning saying he's convinced that Greene is a plant.

Okay, let's assume you are in fact correct, Congressman. The GOP paid for his filing fee. Now what? Did they campaign for him? Tell others to vote for him?

This is one of those times where I'd LOVE for you to investigate. You look even stupider than the voters who voted for this asshole.

He's a fine one to talk. His district was gerrymandered by the courts so he could win election.

We have schoolboards, towns and counties run by the likes of Mr. Greene....and some wonder why our schools score so low.....sheeesh, some people flat refuse to open their eyes.

zeitgeist · « **Reply #12 on:** June 13, 2010, 11:35:24 AM »

Quote from: JohnnyReb on June 13, 2010, 10:37:18 AM

He's a fine one to talk. His district was gerrymandered by the courts so he could win election.

We have schoolboards, towns and counties run by the likes of Mr. Greene....and some wonder why our schools score so low.....sheeesh, some people flat refuse to open their eyes.

Mmmm, Mmmmm, Mmmm, Johnny, please keep us posted on the local spin. Watched the Oberfuher video on the Brad blog link, man, this is just going to be like takin sweet tea in the afternoon heat.

Ballygrl · « **Reply #13 on:** June 13, 2010, 03:37:46 PM »

So can I assume I'm not the only 1 who finds the Dem candidate and the meltdown of the left

?

PatriotGame · « **Reply #14 on:** June 13, 2010, 04:45:10 PM »

WOW!!!111

Greene is a moonbat's moonbat.

BEHOLD!

A public school education "in action".

Ballygrl · « **Reply #15 on:** June 13, 2010, 05:03:32 PM »

Related thread over at DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8550446

Quote

mdmc (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-13-10 05:14 PM
Original message
Why would you want republicans voting in the democratic primary?

-Why look at diebold in S.C? Just look at the voters. Republicans are allowed to vote in the democratic party primary.
Why hack machines when you can just vote for the least electable candidate?
Why break the law when you can legally steal the election?
Why would you want republicans voting in the democratic primary?

Quote

ProgressiveVictory (144 posts) Sun Jun-13-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good question. I wouldn't. I wouldn't wanna vote for any repuke either. That would ruin my day!

Quote

SoCalNative (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-13-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's an open primary, meaning
anyone can vote for anybody. Doesn't matter how you're registered.

Quote

mdmc (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-13-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. right
since there is no republican primary, republicans voted for the weaker democrat. What benefit is there to an "open" primary?

I think it's hilarious that it's possible that some Republicans decided to vote for a Democrat. Looks like this was the total turnout in South Carolina:

Of the 620,073 ballots cast 422,931 were registered as Republicans. 196,600 were Democrats.

BTW, even though I think it's funny in this case, I do have an issue with States allowing things like crossover voting in a Primary. I think if you're a registered Republican then you should only be able to vote for a Republican, if you're a registered Democrat you should only be able to vote for a Democrat, if you're an Independent then you shouldn't be able to vote in a Primary.

miskie · « **Reply #16 on:** June 13, 2010, 05:35:08 PM »

The Democrats were so pleased with themselves and their 'Republican for a day' campaign where they did the same damn thing - vote in primaries for Republicans to weaken the ticket...

Here are a couple of DUmp threads..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8039629&mesg_id=8039629

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x468731

http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5171723

etc etc etc..

Ballygrl · « **Reply #17 on:** June 13, 2010, 05:49:48 PM »

Quote from: miskie on June 13, 2010, 05:35:08 PM

The Democrats were so pleased with themselves and their 'Republican for a day' campaign where they did the same damn thing - vote in primaries for Republicans to weaken the ticket...

Here are a couple of DUmp threads..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8039629&mesg_id=8039629

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x468731

http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5171723

etc etc etc..

Oh my, so they're being hypocrits then?

Chris_ · « **Reply #18 on:** June 13, 2010, 05:55:41 PM »

I found a few more, some from 2006 and 2008.

Vote in the Republican primary on January 15
HOLD YOUR NOSE AND VOTE IN REPUKE PRIMARIES!
Have any of you considered "protest" voting on the Republican primary ballot instead?
OK Dems, change your registration to Republican.
14,500 Democrats Change Party Affiliation To Vote In RI GOP Primary

DefiantSix · « **Reply #19 on:** June 13, 2010, 07:03:47 PM »

Quote

Experts' Eye 100% Unverifiable E-Vote blah blah blah...

I wonder if these are the same "Experts" who pull unemployment and economic predictions out of their collective assholes and then announce on national news how surprised they are when they're wrong. Again.

BlueStateSaint · « **Reply #20 on:** June 14, 2010, 04:33:14 AM »

Quote from: DefiantSix on June 13, 2010, 07:03:47 PM

I wonder if these are the same "Experts" who pull unemployment and economic predictions out of their collective assholes and then announce on national news how surprised they are when they're wrong. Again.

D6, I'm shocked that you'd even have to ask!

DefiantSix · « **Reply #21 on:** June 14, 2010, 08:48:17 AM »

Quote from: BlueStateSaint on June 14, 2010, 04:33:14 AM

D6, I'm shocked that you'd even have to ask!

It's theoretically possible that there is more than one collection of moronic "Experts" exists to keep the DUmbasses supplied in perpetually incorrect WAGs about how the universe's laws govern, isn't it?

Isn't it?

(Must. Not. Violate. VRWC OPSEC.)

Ralph Wiggum · « **Reply #22 on:** June 14, 2010, 08:54:02 AM »

Quote from: BlueStateSaint on June 13, 2010, 04:56:29 AM

So, let me get this straight--this DUchebag is citing his own story as proof of this?

I thought that was amusing too.

My take on the whole issue with this dude in South Carolina.....Thank you Karl Rove, you magnificent bastard!

Karin · « **Reply #23 on:** June 14, 2010, 03:56:49 PM »

Quote from: NHSparky on June 13, 2010, 09:41:19 AM

This is one of those times where I'd LOVE for you to investigate. You look even stupider than the voters who voted for this asshole.

I think they did/have been quietly investigating, and their findings are embarrassing or something.

News:

Author Topic: Experts' Eye 100% Unverifiable E-Vote System in 'Win' of SC's Mystery U.S. Senat (Read 1927 times)